切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (01) : 22 -26. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2015.01.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

肺保护性通气策略对腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝合并GERD患者肺功能的影响研究
吴新华1, 谭杰1, 徐桂萍1,(), 李赞林2, 克力木·阿不都热依木2   
  1. 1. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院麻醉科
    2. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院腹腔镜腹壁疝外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-20 出版日期:2018-02-15
  • 通信作者: 徐桂萍

Effect of protective pulmonary ventilation on laparoscopic lung function in patients with esophageal hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux disease

Xinhua Wu1, Jie Tan1, Guiping Xu1,(), Zanlin Li2, Abdureyimu Kelimu2   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Abdominal Wall Hernia Surgery, People′s Hospital, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous region, Urumqi 2830001, China
    2. Minimally Laparoscopy, Abdominal Wall Hernia Surgery, People′s Hospital, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous region, Urumqi 2830001, China
  • Received:2017-12-20 Published:2018-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Guiping Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Guiping, Email:
引用本文:

吴新华, 谭杰, 徐桂萍, 李赞林, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 肺保护性通气策略对腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝合并GERD患者肺功能的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2018, 05(01): 22-26.

Xinhua Wu, Jie Tan, Guiping Xu, Zanlin Li, Abdureyimu Kelimu. Effect of protective pulmonary ventilation on laparoscopic lung function in patients with esophageal hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux disease[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2018, 05(01): 22-26.

目的

探讨采用肺保护性通气策略对腹腔镜下治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流患者(GERD)呼吸功能的影响。

方法

前瞻性选取2014年4月至2017年10月,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院行择期腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术与胃底折叠术的80例患者作为研究对象,按照入院先后顺序分为对照组和观察组。对照组采用传统容量控制通气模式,按患者体重将潮气量设置为10 ml/kg,呼吸频率设置为12次/min;观察组采用肺保护性通气策略,按患者体重将潮气量设置为6 ml/kg,呼吸频率设置为16次/min,并给予5 cm H2O呼气末正压通气。分别在气腹前(T0)、气腹后2 h(T1)、气腹后4 h(T2)记录2组患者1次平均动脉压(MAP)、中心静脉压(CVP)。在T0、T1、T2、手术后24 h(T3)记录2组患者的肺顺应性(C)、心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR),并抽取血气,计算氧合指数(OI)。

结果

在观察组和对照组中均发现,T1和T2组比T0组的MAP、CVP和C高,差异具有统计学意义(均P<0.05);相对T0组,T1和T2组的HR、RR和OI指标均处于较高水平(均P<0.05)。另外,在同一时间段内,观察组在T0、T1、T2和T3时间HR、RR和OI指标均高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(均P<0.05),但MAP和CVP并未差异(均P>0.05)。

结论

与传统容量控制通气模式相比,采用肺保护性通气策略可以改善腹腔镜下治疗食管裂孔疝合并GERD患者的呼吸功能。

Objective

To investigate the effect of laparoscopic ventilation on respiratory function in patients with esophageal hiatal hernia and GERD under laparoscopy.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted in Department of Anesthesiology, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous region including 80 cases of patients who had undergone laparoscopic esophageal hiatal hernia repair from April 2014 to October 2017 were selected and divided into control group and observation group.In the control group, the traditional capacity control ventilation mode was adopted and the tidal volume was set at 10 ml/kg according to the patient with weight.Breathing rate is set to 12 times per minute.In the observation group, the lung ventilation strategy was adopted.The tidal volume was set to 6 ml/kg according to the patient with weight and 5 cm H2O positive end-pressure ventilation.The mean arterial pressure(MAP)and central venous pressure(CVP)of the two groups were recorded before pneumoperitoneum(T0), 2 h after pneumoperitoneum(T1)and 4 h after pneumoperitoneum(T2)respectively.Lung compliance(C), heart rate(HR)and respiratory rate(RR)were recorded at T0, T1, T2 and 24 hours after surgery(T3). Blood gas was drawn and oxygenation index(OI)was calculated.

Results

Higher levels of MAP, CVP and C were found among T1 and T2 than T0, both in the control and observation group(all P<0.05), so the same as HR, RR and OI.In addition, higher level of C was found in the observation group than the control group at T0, T1 and T2, respectively(all P<0.05), but not for MAP and CVP.

Conclusion

Compared with the traditional volume control ventilation mode, pulmonary protective ventilation strategy can improve respiratory function of patients with laparoscopic treatment of esophageal hiatal hernia and GERD.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较(±s)
表2 2组患者MAP、CVP、C的比较(±s)
表3 2组患者HR、RR、OI的比较
[1]
Hanada Y, Hoshino S, Hoshikawa Y, et al.Endoscopic diagnosis of hiatus hernia under deep inspiration is not consistent with esophageal manometric diagnosis[J].J Gastroenterol, 2017(15): 1-6.
[2]
Senyk J, Arborelius M, Lilja B, et al.Respiratory function in esophageal hiatus hernia.I.Spirometry, gas distribution, and arterial blood gases[J].Respiration, 1975, 32(2): 93-102.
[3]
Sonny A, Sessler DI, You J, et al.The response to Trendelenburg position is minimally affected by underlying hemodynamic conditions in patients with aortic stenosis[J].J Anesth, 2017, 31(5): 692-702.
[4]
Shemesh D, Raikhinstein Y, Orkin D, et al.Anesthesia for vascular access surgery[J].J Vasc Access, 2014, 15 Suppl 7: S38-44.
[5]
Gajic O, Frutos-Vivar F, Esteban A, et al.Ventilator settings as a risk factor for acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients[J].Intensive Care Medicine, 2005, 31(7): 922-926.
[6]
Bouadma L, Dreyfuss D, Ricard JD, et al.Mechanical ventilation and hemorrhagic shock-resuscitation interact to increase inflammatory cytokine release in rats[J].Critical Care Medicine, 2007, 35(11): 2601-2606.
[7]
Gattinoni L, Protti A, Caironi P, et al.Ventilator-induced lung injury: the anatomical and physiological framework[J].Critical Care Medicine, 2010, 38(10 Suppl): S539-548.
[8]
Khuri SF, Henderson WG, DePalma RG, et al.Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications[J].Ann Surg, 2005, 242(3): 326-341;discussion 341-323.
[9]
Tao T, Bo L, Chen F, et al.Effect of protective ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials[J].BMJ Open, 2014, 4(6): e005208.
[10]
Kimura S, Stoicea N, Rosero Britton BR, et al.Preventing Ventilator-Associated Lung Injury: A Perioperative Perspective[J].Front Med(Lausanne), 2016, 3: 25.
[11]
Futier E, Constantin JM, Jaber S.Protective lung ventilation in operating room: a systematic review[J].Minerva Anestesiologica, 2014, 80(6): 726-735.
[12]
Ball L, Dameri M, Pelosi P.Modes of mechanical ventilation for the operating room[J].Best Practice Research: Clinical Anaesthesiology, 2015, 29(3): 285-299.
[13]
Hemmes SN, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, et al.High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during general anaesthesia for open abdominal surgery(PROVHILO trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet, 2014, 384(9942): 495-503.
[14]
Santa Cruz R, Rojas JI, Nervi R, et al.High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure(PEEP)levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013(6): Cd009098.
[15]
Futier E, Constantin JM, Pelosi P, et al.Noninvasive ventilation and alveolar recruitment maneuver improve respiratory function during and after intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized controlled study[J].Anesthesiology, 2011, 114(6): 1354-1363.
[16]
Hedenstierna G.Oxygen and anesthesia: what lung do we deliver to the post-operative ward?[J].Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2012, 56(6): 675-685.
[17]
Serpa Neto A, Cardoso SO, Manetta JA, et al.Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis[J].JAMA, 2012, 308(16): 1651-1659.
[18]
Guay J, Ochroch EA.Intraoperative use of low volume ventilation to decrease postoperative mortality, mechanical ventilation, lengths of stay and lung injury in patients without acute lung injury[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015(12): Cd011151.
[19]
Thompson JS, Baxter BT, Allison JG, et al.Temporal patterns of postoperative complications[J].Archives Surg, 2003, 138(6): 596-602;discussion 602-593.
[1] 杨茂宪, 沈鹏, 王倩倩, 吴旺, 沈永帅, 蒋禛, 徐龙生, 朱建刚, 刘倍倍. 吡啶甲酸镁联合地塞米松对急性呼吸窘迫综合征大鼠的治疗作用研究[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 196-203.
[2] 吴越廷, 周林雨涵, 胡钦, 许华燕, 黄敏, 陈晓勇, 张萌, 李中会, 茹凉, 王秋, 蔡晓唐. 皮质类固醇治疗非卧床杜氏肌营养不良症患儿肺功能与运动功能的纵向研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 292-301.
[3] 阙宏亮, 邓君鹏, 李权, 曾腾跃, 沈华, 谢建军. 俯卧位经后腹腔肾上腺腹腔镜手术的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 188-192.
[4] 郭璟琪, 魏明言, 刘芳, 李冬凌, 关金平, 李立华. 乙酰半胱氨酸治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 768-772.
[5] 杨莎莎, 张毛为, 孙宜田, 刘亚南, 位娟, 魏建, 陈碧. 结缔组织疾病相关间质性肺病并发小气道功能障碍临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 738-743.
[6] 沈琪乐, 赵勤华, 宫素岗, 刘锦铭, 王岚, 邱宏玲. COPD 稳定期患者血清CC16 蛋白表达与肺功能、肺气肿表型的关系分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 690-695.
[7] 刘雯, 赵明栋, 夏伟, 潘以雄. 不同剂量比阿培南治疗重症肺炎的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 789-792.
[8] 张璇, 高杨, 房雅君, 姚艳玲. 保护性机械通气在肺癌胸腔镜肺段切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 563-567.
[9] 陈冬丽, 邓迎丽, 毕婧. α-干扰素治疗急性呼吸道病毒感染对Th1/Th2平衡及肺功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 590-594.
[10] 王微, 丁霖, 陈茜, 呼延欣, 闫蓓. 综合治疗对慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效及转归影响分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 621-624.
[11] 周璇, 谢莉, 邹娟. 尼达尼布对特发性肺纤维化肺功能、肺纤维化程度及PDGF、PGE2、TGF-β1的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 368-372.
[12] 袁广琴, 朱珠, 林云霞. 胸腺肽联合无创正压通气救治AECOPD并发Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 438-441.
[13] 罗孝平, 封敏, 黄川, 唐茜, 蒋艳, 胡莉丽. 渐进式抗阻训练干预在非小细胞肺癌中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 472-474.
[14] 陈先志, 许磊, 冯其柱, 王琦. 布地奈德联合复方异丙托溴铵雾化吸入在老年患者腹腔镜围手术期中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 531-536.
[15] 闫维, 张二明, 张克, 安欣华, 向平超. 北京市石景山区40岁及以上居民早期慢性阻塞性肺疾病异质性及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 533-540.
阅读次数
全文


摘要