切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (04) : 151 -154. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2016.04.003

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合胃底折叠术联合胆囊切除术的疗效分析
李义亮1, 张成1, 克力木·阿不都热依木1,(), 苏福增1, 王志1, 李慧灵1, 杜智1, 祝志开1, 李松1   
  1. 1. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创外科、疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-08 出版日期:2016-11-15
  • 通信作者: 克力木·阿不都热依木

Analysis the efficacy of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and fundoplication and cholecystectomy treatment of hiatal hernia combined with gastroesophageal reflux disease and gallstone

Yiliang Li1, Cheng Zhang1, Abudureyimu Kelimu·1,(), Fuzeng Su1, Zhi Wang1, Huiling Li1, Zhi Du1, Zhikai Zhu1, Song Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery & Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Xinjiang UygurAutonomous Region People′s Hospital, Urumuqi830001, China
  • Received:2016-10-08 Published:2016-11-15
  • Corresponding author: Abudureyimu Kelimu·
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Kelimu·Abudureyimu, Email:
引用本文:

李义亮, 张成, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 苏福增, 王志, 李慧灵, 杜智, 祝志开, 李松. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合胃底折叠术联合胆囊切除术的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2016, 03(04): 151-154.

Yiliang Li, Cheng Zhang, Abudureyimu Kelimu·, Fuzeng Su, Zhi Wang, Huiling Li, Zhi Du, Zhikai Zhu, Song Li. Analysis the efficacy of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and fundoplication and cholecystectomy treatment of hiatal hernia combined with gastroesophageal reflux disease and gallstone[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2016, 03(04): 151-154.

目的

探讨腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合胃底折叠术联合胆囊切除术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病合并胆囊结石患者的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院2012年8月至2016年8月,收治的27例行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合胃底折叠术联合胆囊切除术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病合并胆囊结石患者的临床资料,其中单纯食管裂孔疝修补患者22例,生物补片修补患者2例,强生PHY补片修补患者1例,巴德补片修补患者1例,泰科食管裂孔疝专用防粘连补片修补患者1例。统计上述患者术前及术后6个月的24 h食管pH、食管测压、GERD-Q量表评分及术后并发症等,回顾性分析腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合胃底折叠术联合胆囊切除术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病合并胆囊结石的临床疗效。

结果

本组患者无围手术期死亡,术后无严重并发症发生,术后患者反流症状均较术前明显改善,反流时间(1.40±2.10)h、反流次数(29.83±19.71)次、酸反流时间百分比(6.47±8.79)%、及DeMeester评分(7.28±7.38)分、GERD-Q量表评分(7.18±1.33)分较术前分别为(2.04±1.91)h、(120.40±82.72)次、(9.90±9.27)%、(28.23±42.16)分、(10.91±2.02)分明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后LES压力中的静息呼吸最小值为(7.24±6.86)mmHg,静息呼吸平均值为(12.91±6.89)mmHg,较术前分别为(0.70±6.15)mmHg、(7.33±7.72)mmHg明显提高,残余压平均值为(8.16±3.82)mmHg,最大值为(16.10±12.05)mmHg,较术前分别为(4.36±4.77)mmHg、(7.49±5.15)mmHg明显提高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后松弛率(58.50±25.47)%]较术前[(62.27±27.55)%明显降低,但术后无效吞咽百分比(11.25±21.04)%较术前(6.36±10.26)%略有增加,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访中位数10个月,随访过程中无复发。

结论

腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合胃底折叠术联合胆囊切除术可有效抑制反流症状,提高LES压力,解决患者病痛,疗效确切,值得临床推广。

Objective

To researchthe efficacy of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and fundoplication and cholecystectomy treatment of hiatal hernia combined with gastroesophageal reflux disease and gallstone.

Methods

27 patients′information ofhiatal hernia combined with gastroesophageal reflux disease and gallstone that underwentlaparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and fundoplication and cholecystectomy in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People′s Hospital from August 2012 to August 2016.22 cases were adopted pure hiatal hernia suture, 2 cases used biological patch repair, 1 case used Johnson PHY patch repair, 1 case used Bade patch repair, 1 case used Tyco hiatal hernia dedicated anti-blocking patch repair.Analyzed and detected24 hours esophageal pH, esophageal manometry, GERD Q score and postoperative complications before surgery and 6 months postoperativeof these patients′.Retrospective analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and fundoplication and cholecystectomy treatment of hiatal hernia combined with gastroesophageal reflux disease and gallstone.

Results

There was no perioperative deaths and serious complications during perioperative.The reflux symptoms were significantly improved postoperative.In reflux time(1.40±2.10), the number of reflux(29.83±19.71), acid reflux time percentage(6.47±8.79)and DeMeester score(7.28±7.38)were lower than the preoperative(2.04±1.91), (120.40±82.72), (9.90±9.27), (28.23±42.16), respectively, GERD Q scale score(7.18±1.33)was significantly lower than preoperative(10.91±2.02), the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). LES pressure with minimum resting breathing was (7.24±6.86), mean resting breathing was (12.91±6.89), which were significantly increased than preoperative (0.70±6.15), (97.33±7.72), respectively, residual pressure with average was(8.16±3.82), maximum was(16.10±12.05), weresignificantly increased than preoperative(4.36±4.77), (7.49±5.15), respectively, relaxation rate(58.50±25.47)%was significantly reduced than preoperative (62.27±27.55)%, but swallowing invalid (11.25±21.04)was increased than preoperative (6.36±10.26), the difference was no significant(P>0.05). The median follow-up time was10 months, with no recurrence during follow-up.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and fundoplication can effectively inhibit reflux symptoms, increase LES pressure, which worthy of promotion, in patients with pain resolved and effective, worthy of promotion.

表1 术前、术后食管24 h pH值监测的比较(±s)
表2 术前、术后食管测压结果(±s)
1
Mello M, Gyawali CP.Esophageal manometry in gastroesophageal reflux disease[J].Gastroenterol Clin North Am,2014,43(1):69-87.
2
林运,张成,克力木,等.胃食管反流病是否会引发心房纤颤[J/CD].中华胃食管反流病电子杂志,2015(1):51-53.
3
季锋,汪忠镐,李震,等.高分辨率食管测压法在食管裂孔疝诊断中的意义[J].中华普通外科杂志,2013,18(6):427-430.
4
克力木,张成,牛伟亚.腹腔镜下Toupet胃底折叠术治疗食道裂孔疝临床应用[J].国际外科学杂志,2009,36(9):594-597.
5
张成,克力木,牛伟亚,等.腹腔镜下胃底Nissen折叠术式治疗的食道裂孔疝临床应用[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2010,4(1):53-56.
6
张成,克力木,李义亮,等.氩离子凝固术联合腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术加胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并Barrett食管的疗效观察[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2015,18(11):1084-1087.
7
张成,李俊生,克力木,等.2013年美国胃肠内镜外科医师协会食管裂孔疝诊疗指南解读(一)[J/CD].中华胃食管反流病电子杂志,2015,2(3):129-130.
8
克力木,阿力木江·麦斯依提,张成,等.腹腔镜手术治疗胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝650例临床分析[J].中国实用外科杂志,2014,34(5):416-418.
9
克力木,张成,汪忠镐.胃食管反流病与食管裂孔疝外科临床研究现状与争议[J/CD].中华胃食管反流病电子杂志,2014(1):4-6.
10
杨玉兵,王耿泽,张海洋.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝[J].中国普通外科杂志,2014,23(12):1730-1732.
11
郑朝旭,袁凯涛,陈流华,等.腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病安全性的Meta分析[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献:电子版,2009,3(5):434-437.
12
Hoshino M, Omura N, Yano F,et al.Backflow prevention mechanism of laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication using high-resolution manometry[J].Surg Endosc,2016,30(7):2703-2710.
13
杜航向,谭戈文,杨治力,等.腹腔镜Nissen与Toupet胃底折叠术式治疗胃食管反流病疗效比较的Meta分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2012,15(8):814-818.
14
Broeders JA, Roks DJ, Ahmed Ali U,et al.Laparoscopic anterior 180-degree versus nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease:systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials[J].Ann Surg,2013,257(5):850-859.
[1] 王雅楠, 刘丹, 曹正浓, 贾慧敏. 儿童迟发性先天性膈疝患儿的临床诊治特点分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 410-419.
[2] 白浪, 张雪玉, 白铁成, 贺爱军. 腹腔镜近端胃切除术中圆锥形重叠吻合成形术对Siewert Ⅱ型AEG患者胃食管反流、营养状态的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 679-682.
[3] 陈燕. LCBDE和ERCP+EST治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 385-388.
[4] 李海云, 赵敏娴, 申英末, 杨慧琪. 胃底折叠术预防食管裂孔疝术后并发症的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 485-490.
[5] 玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.
[6] 任传富, 杨志, 徐恩, 何梓芸, 罗板鑫, 陈新, 夏雪峰. 腹腔镜疝修补术联合胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病40 例临床分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 507-511.
[7] 李义亮, 苏拉依曼·牙库甫, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合Nissen 胃底折叠术短期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 512-517.
[8] 杜晨阳, 王勇, 段鑫, 柯文杰, 石念, 武英翔, 罗文. 腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术后吞咽困难的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 523-527.
[9] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[10] 胡志伟, 吴继敏, 汪忠镐, 张美光. 胃食管反流病食管外症状抗反流手术适应证及术前评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 241-246.
[11] 胡志伟, 吴继敏, 邓昌荣, 战秀岚, 纪涛, 王峰, 田书瑞, 陈冬, 张玉, 刘健男, 宋庆. 抗反流黏膜套扎治疗顽固性胃食管反流病[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 227-233.
[12] 唐小久, 胡曼, 许必君, 肖亚. 肥胖合并胃食管反流病患者严重程度与其焦虑抑郁及营养状态的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 360-364.
[13] 王立辉, 杜海涛, 万军, 陈倩倩. 动态反流监测在食管-咽喉反流性疾病诊断中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 268-272.
[14] 张静, 白亦冰, 来要良, 刘永, 和媛媛, 苏敏. 不同体位对胃食管反流病患者食管高分辨率测压的影响[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 115-120.
[15] 张靖, 柏君, 陈玉盟, 张鹏, 侯芳芳, 王军芳, 孙静, 赵士博, 杨喆, 张玥, 张瑞芳, 朱宏斌. 抗反流黏膜消融术治疗胃食管反流病患者的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 121-125.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?