切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (02) : 90 -95. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2023.02.006

论著

质子泵抑制剂治疗期间焦虑对胃食管反流病疗效的影响
文明, 熊英, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木()   
  1. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院心血管内科
    830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创、疝与腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-28 出版日期:2023-05-15
  • 通信作者: 克力木·阿不都热依木

Effect of anxiety during proton pump inhibitor treatment on curative effect of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Ming Wen, Ying Xiong   

  1. Department of Cardiovascular, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Autonomous Region, Urumqi 83001, China
    Department of Minimally Invasive, Hernia and Abdominal Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Autonomous Region, Urumqi 83001, China
  • Received:2022-11-28 Published:2023-05-15
引用本文:

文明, 熊英, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 质子泵抑制剂治疗期间焦虑对胃食管反流病疗效的影响[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 90-95.

Ming Wen, Ying Xiong. Effect of anxiety during proton pump inhibitor treatment on curative effect of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2023, 10(02): 90-95.

目的

探讨质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗期间焦虑对胃食管反流病(GERD)疗效的影响。

方法

本研究为前瞻性队列研究。收集2018年1月至2021年12月新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院经胃镜明确诊断为GERD并需接受PPI治疗的患者503例。主要终点事件为经质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗有效,随访时间4周,通过门诊、电话、医院病历资料等方式进行随访,对纳入的患者进行密切随访,统计终点事件发生情况、以及各项指标的检测情况。按照患者是否焦虑分为2组,其中焦虑组患者179例,无焦虑组患者49例。绘制Kaplan-Meier生存曲线明确不同焦虑状态下经PPI治疗后有效率的差异,并运用单因素Cox回归模型及多因素Cox回归模型分别明确焦虑与有效率的联系,与此同时运用趋势性检验,明确不同程度焦虑对有效率影响的异同。

结果

本研究最终纳入GERD患者425例。4周随访结束后,425例GERD患者中297例(69.88%)患者经PPI治疗有效,128例(30.12%)患者无效;其中在246例合并焦虑患者中,有160例(65.04%)患者经PPI治疗有效,86例(34.96%)患者无效。179例未合并焦虑的患者中有137例(76.54%)患者经治疗有效,有42例(23.46%)患者无效;未合并焦虑的患者具有更高缓解率。单因素及多因素Cox回归分析,结果提示无论是单因素分析(HR=1.05,95%CI: 1.02~1.07; P<0.05)还是多因素分析(HR=1.05,95%CI: 1.02~1.07; P<0.05),焦虑均为降低PPI疗效的危险因素;进行趋势性检验发现,随着焦虑程度的增加,PPI治疗后的有效率明显下降(P for trend<0.05)。

结论

焦虑是难治性胃食管反流病的一个危险因素。焦虑状态降低了PPIs对GERD症状的治疗效果。因此,需要注意检测具有GERD症状的患者的焦虑状态,以适当地治疗患者并优化治疗结果。

Objective

To explore the effect of anxiety during proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment on the curative effect of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Methods

This study was a prospective cohort study. From January 2018 to December 2021, 503 patients who were diagnosed as GERD by gastroscopy and needed PPI treatment were collected. The main end point was effective treatment with proton pump inhibitor (PPI), and the follow-up time was 4 weeks. The patients were followed up by outpatient service, telephone and hospital medical records, and the occurrence of end point events and the detection of various indicators were counted. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they were anxious or not, including 179 patients in anxiety group and 49 patients in non-anxiety group. Draw Kaplan-Meier survival curve to clarify the difference of effective rate after PPI treatment in different anxiety States, and use single-factor Cox regression model and multi-factor Cox regression model to clarify the relationship between anxiety and effective rate respectively, and at the same time use trend test to clarify the similarities and differences of different levels of anxiety on effective rate.

Results

425 patients with GERD were finally included in this study. After 4-week follow-up, among 425 patients with GERD, 297 (69.88%) were effective after PPI treatment, and 128 (30.12%) were ineffective. Among 246 patients with anxiety, 160 patients (65.04%) were effective after PPI treatment, and 86 patients (34.96%) were ineffective. Among 179 patients without anxiety, 137 (76.54%) were effective after treatment, and 42 (23.46%) were ineffective. Patients without anxiety have a higher remission rate. The results of univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that no matter univariate analysis (HR=1.05,95%CI: 1.02-1.07; P<0.05) or multivariate analysis (HR=1.05,95%CI: 1.02-1.07; P<0.05), anxiety is a risk factor for reducing the curative effect of PPI; The trend test showed that with the increase of anxiety, the effective rate after PPI treatment decreased significantly (P for trend<0.05).

Conclusion

Anxiety is a risk factor for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. Anxiety reduces the therapeutic effect of PPIs on GERD symptoms. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to detect the anxiety state of patients with GERD symptoms in order to treat patients appropriately and optimize the treatment results.

表1 2组基线资料比较
图1 焦虑对总有效率影响的生存分析
图2 单因素分析各项指标对全因死亡率的影响 注:GAD-7为广泛性焦虑障碍量表;SBP为收缩压;BMI为体质量指数
图3 多因素分析各项指标对再住院率的影响 注:GAD-7为广泛性焦虑障碍量表;SBP为收缩压;BMI为体质量指数
1
Manben, Haruma K, Kamada T, et al. Changes of upper gastrointestinal symptoms and endoscopic findings in Japan over 25 years [J]. Internal Medicine, 2011, 50(13): 1357-63.
2
Nakada K, Matsuhashi N, Iwakiri K, et al. Development and validation of a simple and multifaceted instrument,GERD-TEST,for the clinical evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux and dyspeptic symptoms [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2017, 28): 13.
3
Choi J M, Yang J I, Kang S J, et al. Association between anxiety and depression and gastroesophageal reflux disease: results from a large cross-sectional study [J]. Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility, 2018, 24(4): 593-602.
4
Okauyama M, Takaishi O, Nakahara K, et al. Associations among gastroesophageal reflux disease, psychological stress, and sleep disturbances in Japanese adults [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2017, 52(1): 44-9.
5
Yang X J, Jiang H M, Hou X H, et al. Anxiety and depression in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and their effect on quality of life [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015, 21(14): 4302-9.
6
Vakil N, Van ZAanten S V, Kahrilas P, et al. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus [J]. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2006, 101(8): 1125-40.
7
Hongo M. Minimal changes in reflux esophagitis: red ones and white ones [J]. Journal of Gastroenterology, 2006, 41(2): 95-9.
8
Heading R C, Monnikes H, Tholen A, et al. Prediction of response to PPI therapy and factors influencing treatment outcome in patients with GORD: a prospective pragmatic trial using pantoprazole [J]. Bmc Gastroenterology, 2011, 11
9
Niu X P, Han Z, Liu S F, et al. Risk factors for proton pump inhibitor refractoriness in Chinese patients with non-erosive reflux disease [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, (20): 6.
10
Niu X P, Han Z, Liu S F,Treatment of functional dyspepsia with antianxiety or antidepressive agents: systematic review [J]. Journal of Gastroenterology, 2005, 40(11): 1036-42.
11
Abell T L, Cutts T F, Cooper T. Effect of cisapride therapy for severe dyspepsia on gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1993, 28(s195): 60-4.
12
Nakada K, Oshio A, Matshuashi N, et al. Causal effect of anxiety and depression status on the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease and functional dyspepsia during proton pump inhibitor therapy [J]. Esophagus, 1-8.
13
Johnston B T. Stress and heartburn [J]. J Psychosom Res, 2005, 59(6): 425-6.
14
Farre R, DE VOS R, Geboes K, et al. Critical role of stress in increased oesophageal mucosa permeability and dilated intercellular spaces [J]. Gut, 2007, 56(9): 1191-7.
15
Kamolz T, Velanovich V. Psychological and emotional aspects of gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. Dis Esophagus, 2002, 15(3): 199-203.
[1] 张华, 孙宇, 乡世健, 李樱媚, 王小群. 循环肿瘤细胞预测晚期胃肠癌患者化疗药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 422-425.
[2] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[3] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[4] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[5] 汪毅, 许思哲, 任章霞. 胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 542-545.
[6] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[7] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[8] 邰清亮, 施波, 侍新宇, 陈国梁, 陈俊杰, 武冠廷, 王索, 孙金兵, 顾闻, 叶建新, 何宋兵. 腹腔镜次全结肠切除术治疗顽固性慢传输型便秘的疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 478-483.
[9] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[10] 高显奎, 赵太云, 陆兴俊, 张洪领, 房修罗, 闫碧春, 王胤, 王永翠, 刘苗苗, 冉若男. 内镜电凝止血与组织胶注射治疗上消化道溃疡伴出血的疗效观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 452-455.
[11] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[12] 张景旭, 李德舫, 由上可, 张玉田. 贝伐珠单抗与安罗替尼联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期直肠癌的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 289-293.
[13] 杨镠, 秦岚群, 耿茜, 李栋庆, 戚春建, 蒋华. 可溶性免疫检查点对胃癌患者免疫治疗疗效和预后的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 305-311.
[14] 盛静, 梅勇, 夏佩, 王晓林. 乌苯美司联合伊立替康二线治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 317-321.
[15] 李莹倩, 李华山. 基于真实世界的完全性直肠脱垂治疗方式评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 700-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要