切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (02) : 90 -95. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2023.02.006

论著

质子泵抑制剂治疗期间焦虑对胃食管反流病疗效的影响
文明, 熊英, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木()   
  1. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院心血管内科
    830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创、疝与腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-28 出版日期:2023-05-15
  • 通信作者: 克力木·阿不都热依木

Effect of anxiety during proton pump inhibitor treatment on curative effect of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Ming Wen, Ying Xiong   

  1. Department of Cardiovascular, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Autonomous Region, Urumqi 83001, China
    Department of Minimally Invasive, Hernia and Abdominal Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Autonomous Region, Urumqi 83001, China
  • Received:2022-11-28 Published:2023-05-15
引用本文:

文明, 熊英, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 质子泵抑制剂治疗期间焦虑对胃食管反流病疗效的影响[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 90-95.

Ming Wen, Ying Xiong. Effect of anxiety during proton pump inhibitor treatment on curative effect of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2023, 10(02): 90-95.

目的

探讨质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗期间焦虑对胃食管反流病(GERD)疗效的影响。

方法

本研究为前瞻性队列研究。收集2018年1月至2021年12月新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院经胃镜明确诊断为GERD并需接受PPI治疗的患者503例。主要终点事件为经质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗有效,随访时间4周,通过门诊、电话、医院病历资料等方式进行随访,对纳入的患者进行密切随访,统计终点事件发生情况、以及各项指标的检测情况。按照患者是否焦虑分为2组,其中焦虑组患者179例,无焦虑组患者49例。绘制Kaplan-Meier生存曲线明确不同焦虑状态下经PPI治疗后有效率的差异,并运用单因素Cox回归模型及多因素Cox回归模型分别明确焦虑与有效率的联系,与此同时运用趋势性检验,明确不同程度焦虑对有效率影响的异同。

结果

本研究最终纳入GERD患者425例。4周随访结束后,425例GERD患者中297例(69.88%)患者经PPI治疗有效,128例(30.12%)患者无效;其中在246例合并焦虑患者中,有160例(65.04%)患者经PPI治疗有效,86例(34.96%)患者无效。179例未合并焦虑的患者中有137例(76.54%)患者经治疗有效,有42例(23.46%)患者无效;未合并焦虑的患者具有更高缓解率。单因素及多因素Cox回归分析,结果提示无论是单因素分析(HR=1.05,95%CI: 1.02~1.07; P<0.05)还是多因素分析(HR=1.05,95%CI: 1.02~1.07; P<0.05),焦虑均为降低PPI疗效的危险因素;进行趋势性检验发现,随着焦虑程度的增加,PPI治疗后的有效率明显下降(P for trend<0.05)。

结论

焦虑是难治性胃食管反流病的一个危险因素。焦虑状态降低了PPIs对GERD症状的治疗效果。因此,需要注意检测具有GERD症状的患者的焦虑状态,以适当地治疗患者并优化治疗结果。

Objective

To explore the effect of anxiety during proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment on the curative effect of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Methods

This study was a prospective cohort study. From January 2018 to December 2021, 503 patients who were diagnosed as GERD by gastroscopy and needed PPI treatment were collected. The main end point was effective treatment with proton pump inhibitor (PPI), and the follow-up time was 4 weeks. The patients were followed up by outpatient service, telephone and hospital medical records, and the occurrence of end point events and the detection of various indicators were counted. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they were anxious or not, including 179 patients in anxiety group and 49 patients in non-anxiety group. Draw Kaplan-Meier survival curve to clarify the difference of effective rate after PPI treatment in different anxiety States, and use single-factor Cox regression model and multi-factor Cox regression model to clarify the relationship between anxiety and effective rate respectively, and at the same time use trend test to clarify the similarities and differences of different levels of anxiety on effective rate.

Results

425 patients with GERD were finally included in this study. After 4-week follow-up, among 425 patients with GERD, 297 (69.88%) were effective after PPI treatment, and 128 (30.12%) were ineffective. Among 246 patients with anxiety, 160 patients (65.04%) were effective after PPI treatment, and 86 patients (34.96%) were ineffective. Among 179 patients without anxiety, 137 (76.54%) were effective after treatment, and 42 (23.46%) were ineffective. Patients without anxiety have a higher remission rate. The results of univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that no matter univariate analysis (HR=1.05,95%CI: 1.02-1.07; P<0.05) or multivariate analysis (HR=1.05,95%CI: 1.02-1.07; P<0.05), anxiety is a risk factor for reducing the curative effect of PPI; The trend test showed that with the increase of anxiety, the effective rate after PPI treatment decreased significantly (P for trend<0.05).

Conclusion

Anxiety is a risk factor for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. Anxiety reduces the therapeutic effect of PPIs on GERD symptoms. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to detect the anxiety state of patients with GERD symptoms in order to treat patients appropriately and optimize the treatment results.

表1 2组基线资料比较
图1 焦虑对总有效率影响的生存分析
图2 单因素分析各项指标对全因死亡率的影响 注:GAD-7为广泛性焦虑障碍量表;SBP为收缩压;BMI为体质量指数
图3 多因素分析各项指标对再住院率的影响 注:GAD-7为广泛性焦虑障碍量表;SBP为收缩压;BMI为体质量指数
1
Manben, Haruma K, Kamada T, et al. Changes of upper gastrointestinal symptoms and endoscopic findings in Japan over 25 years [J]. Internal Medicine, 2011, 50(13): 1357-63.
2
Nakada K, Matsuhashi N, Iwakiri K, et al. Development and validation of a simple and multifaceted instrument,GERD-TEST,for the clinical evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux and dyspeptic symptoms [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2017, 28): 13.
3
Choi J M, Yang J I, Kang S J, et al. Association between anxiety and depression and gastroesophageal reflux disease: results from a large cross-sectional study [J]. Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility, 2018, 24(4): 593-602.
4
Okauyama M, Takaishi O, Nakahara K, et al. Associations among gastroesophageal reflux disease, psychological stress, and sleep disturbances in Japanese adults [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2017, 52(1): 44-9.
5
Yang X J, Jiang H M, Hou X H, et al. Anxiety and depression in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and their effect on quality of life [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015, 21(14): 4302-9.
6
Vakil N, Van ZAanten S V, Kahrilas P, et al. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus [J]. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2006, 101(8): 1125-40.
7
Hongo M. Minimal changes in reflux esophagitis: red ones and white ones [J]. Journal of Gastroenterology, 2006, 41(2): 95-9.
8
Heading R C, Monnikes H, Tholen A, et al. Prediction of response to PPI therapy and factors influencing treatment outcome in patients with GORD: a prospective pragmatic trial using pantoprazole [J]. Bmc Gastroenterology, 2011, 11
9
Niu X P, Han Z, Liu S F, et al. Risk factors for proton pump inhibitor refractoriness in Chinese patients with non-erosive reflux disease [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, (20): 6.
10
Niu X P, Han Z, Liu S F,Treatment of functional dyspepsia with antianxiety or antidepressive agents: systematic review [J]. Journal of Gastroenterology, 2005, 40(11): 1036-42.
11
Abell T L, Cutts T F, Cooper T. Effect of cisapride therapy for severe dyspepsia on gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1993, 28(s195): 60-4.
12
Nakada K, Oshio A, Matshuashi N, et al. Causal effect of anxiety and depression status on the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease and functional dyspepsia during proton pump inhibitor therapy [J]. Esophagus, 1-8.
13
Johnston B T. Stress and heartburn [J]. J Psychosom Res, 2005, 59(6): 425-6.
14
Farre R, DE VOS R, Geboes K, et al. Critical role of stress in increased oesophageal mucosa permeability and dilated intercellular spaces [J]. Gut, 2007, 56(9): 1191-7.
15
Kamolz T, Velanovich V. Psychological and emotional aspects of gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. Dis Esophagus, 2002, 15(3): 199-203.
[1] 张启龙, 柳亿, 卢会丽, 罗慧, 李成林, 王菁, 王辉. 奥妥珠单抗治疗磷脂酶A2受体相关膜性肾病的疗效与安全性:单中心回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 379-384.
[2] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[3] 聂生军, 王钰, 王毅, 鲜小庆, 马生成. 复方倍他米松局部注射联合光动力疗法治疗小型瘢痕疙瘩的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 404-410.
[4] 高金红, 陈玉梅, 郭韵. 基于King互动达标理论的心理疏导在腹腔镜肝癌切除术患者的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 517-520.
[5] 王亚岚, 倪婧, 余世庆, 陶银花, 张荣. 尼达尼布抗纤维化治疗特发性肺纤维化的耐受性和疗效预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 750-755.
[6] 詹济玮, 蔡柳春, 温琼娜, 郭石生, 温春妹, 温鹤明. 布地格福联合噻托溴铵治疗AECOPD 的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 823-826.
[7] 魏孔源, 仵正, 王铮, 黎韡. 机器人胰腺中段切除后远端胰腺消化道不同重建方式初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 295-300.
[8] 梁艳娉, 列诗韵, 王艺穗, 吴晓瑛, 林颖. 基于内镜操作细节记录系统构建胃底静脉曲张内镜下组织胶注射术的标准化管理方案[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 705-709.
[9] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[10] 王玲, 樊文彬, 倪嘉淳, 蔡增进. 功能性便秘与焦虑抑郁共病的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 411-416.
[11] 史彬, 司远. 益气和络方联合缬沙坦治疗气阴两虚兼血瘀证IgA 肾病的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 306-312.
[12] 韩俊岭, 王刚, 马厉英, 连颖, 徐慧. 维生素D 联合匹维溴铵治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征患者疗效及对肠道屏障功能指标的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 560-564.
[13] 阳跃, 庹晓晔, 崔子豪, 欧阳四民, 林海阳, 胡景宇, 胡银, 李涛, 赵景峰, 郝岱峰, 冯光. 改良“阅读者”皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮的疗效[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 751-755.
[14] 王丽娜, 吕书霞, 李亚男. 脑卒中偏瘫患者健康焦虑元认知与疾病接受度、恐惧疾病进展的相关性[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 434-440.
[15] 克地尔牙·马合木提, 胡波, 杨琼, 闫素, 胡岚卿, 高沛沛, 姚恩生. 依达拉奉右莰醇对急性脑梗死后认知功能障碍的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 459-466.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?