切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 139 -143. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2025.04.002

论著

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术联合锐性His角重建术对肥胖患者术后胃食管反流的影响
木拉提·吐尔逊(), 张辅江, 闫勋   
  1. 841000 库尔勒,巴州人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-05 出版日期:2025-11-15
  • 通信作者: 木拉提·吐尔逊

Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with sharp his angle reconstruction on postoperative gastroesophageal reflux in obese patients

Tuerxun Mulati(), Fujiang Zhang, Xun Yan   

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Bazhou People’s Hospital, Bazhou 841000, China
  • Received:2025-03-05 Published:2025-11-15
  • Corresponding author: Tuerxun Mulati
引用本文:

木拉提·吐尔逊, 张辅江, 闫勋. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术联合锐性His角重建术对肥胖患者术后胃食管反流的影响[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2025, 12(04): 139-143.

Tuerxun Mulati, Fujiang Zhang, Xun Yan. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with sharp his angle reconstruction on postoperative gastroesophageal reflux in obese patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2025, 12(04): 139-143.

目的

探讨腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)联合术中锐性His角重建术(LSG-His)对肥胖患者术后胃食管反流病(GERD)的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2021年1月至2023年12月于巴州人民医院接受手术的58例肥胖患者的临床资料,根据手术方式将患者分为LSG组33例和LSG-His组25例。采用单因素分析(独立样本t检验、χ2检验)比较2组患者的围手术期指标(手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间)、术后并发症、术后12个月减重效果及GERD发生率的差异,并采用多因素Logistic回归分析GERD发生的独立影响因素。

结果

LSG-His组术后GERD发生率为24.0%(6/25),低于LSG组的44.0%(14/33),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=4.211,P=0.048)。LSG-His组术后住院时间短于LSG组[(4.1±0.5)d vs (4.6±0.7)d,t=2.350,P=0.032]。2组术后12个月多余体质量减少百分比[(47.2%±6.3%) vs (46.8±6.1)%]及总体并发症发生率(16.00% vs 27.27%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。多因素回归分析显示手术方式是GERD发生的独立影响因素(OR=0.414,95%CI:0.175~0.982,P=0.046)。

结论

LSG-His术式可在不影响减重效果的前提下,有效降低肥胖患者术后GERD的发生风险,且未增加手术风险。

Objective

To investigate the preventive effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) combined with intraoperative sharp His angle reconstruction (LSG-His) on postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in obese patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of 58 obese patients who underwent surgery at Bazhou People’s Hospital from January 2021 to December 2023. Patients were divided into LSG group (n=33) and LSG-His group (n=25) according to the surgical procedure. Univariate analysis (independent sample t-test, χ2 test) was used to compare perioperative indicators (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay), postoperative complications, weight loss outcomes at 12 months postoperatively, and incidence of GERD between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent influencing factors for GERD.

Results

The incidence of postoperative GERD in the LSG-His group was 24.0% (6/25), which was significantly lower than that in the LSG group (44.0%, 14/33; χ2=4.211, P=0.048). The LSG-His group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay than the LSG group [(4.1±0.5) days vs (4.6±0.7) days, t=2.350, P=0.032]. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of percentage of excess weight loss at 12 months postoperatively [(47.2%±6.3%) vs (46.8%±6.1%)] or overall complication rate (16.00% vs 27.27%; P>0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that surgical procedure was an independent predictor of GERD (OR=0.414, 95%CI: 0.175–0.982, P=0.046).

Conclusion

The LSG-His procedure effectively reduces the risk of postoperative GERD in obese patients without compromising weight loss outcomes or increasing surgical risks.

图1 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)联合His角重建示意图,图a示常规LSG,图b示His角重建
图2 consort流程图
表1 2组接受减重手术的肥胖患者基线资料比较
表2 2组接受减重手术的肥胖患者围手术期指标比较(±s
表3 2组接受减重手术的肥胖患者术后并发症比较[例(%)]
表4 接受减重手术的肥胖患者术后胃食管反流发生的多因素Logistic回归分析
1
赵敏, 吴刚, 孙丽. 肥胖症患者减重术后胃食管反流病的长期随访研究 [J]. 中华胃食管反流杂志, 2023, 15(1): 45-51.
2
朱利勇, 高祥, 李鹏洲, 等. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术规范化操作要点 [J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2024, 23(8):1044-1048.
3
Lee WJ, Almulaifi A, Tsou JJ, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity: current state and future directions [J]. J Obes, 2021, 2021: 9952416.
4
王银萍, 季峰, 张永乐. 胃食管反流病患者胃食管连接部形态与24 h食管pH-阻抗监测结果、胃镜结果的相关性研究 [J]. 中国实用医刊, 2022, 49(6): 26-29.
5
李明, 王芳, 陈强. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中His角重建对胃食管反流的预防作用 [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2021, 24(6): 512-517.
6
曹可, 石旭寅, 金莹, 等. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合锐性His角重建术治疗肥胖症的短期疗效 [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2024, 27(10): 1050-1055.
7
Chen L, Wang Y, Zhang H, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with anti-reflux modifications: A multicenter cohort study [J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(4): 2890-2898.
8
Quero G, Fiorillo C, Dallemagne B, et al. The Causes of Gastroesophageal Reflux after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Quantitative Assessment of the Structure and Function of the Esophagogastric Junction by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and High-Resolution Manometry [J]. Obes Surg, 2020, 30(6): 2108-2117.
9
Cao K, Shi XY, Jin Y, et al. Short-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with reconstruction of the acute His angle on postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2024, 27(10): 1050-1055.
10
Salminen P, Grönroos S, Helmiö M, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss, comorbidities, and reflux at 10 years in adult patients with obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA Surg, 2022, 157(8): 656-666.
11
张华, 刘伟, 周涛. 改良腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的临床疗效及抗反流机制研究[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2022, 21(4): 332-338.
12
孙武青, 郭震, 郝少龙, 等. LSG中保留胃窦部及His角完整性对术后胃食管反流病的影响 [J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(2): 95-99.
[1] 康星, 俞杭, 单晓东, 孙喜太, 褚薛慧. 单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术围手术期血液管理措施的比较研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 18-21.
[2] 陈斌雄, 谢铭. 袖状胃切除术与胃旁路术对肥胖合并T2DM的治疗效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 461-466.
[3] 乔晞. 肥胖相关性肾脏疾病的治疗[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 300-300.
[4] 朱风尚, 熊光苏, 韩峻峰. 重视减重多模式组合和个体化治疗[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 561-564.
[5] 张峥祥, 高龙, 李文. 柴胡疏肝散对胃食管反流病患者的效果及细胞因子、肠道菌群水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 590-593.
[6] 郝立婷, 马金鑫, 刘耀龙. 超声结合血清胃泌素17、胃蛋白酶对胃食管反流病的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(04): 376-380.
[7] 唐欣然, 王翊钊, 刘明言, 马连君. 经口内镜下贲门缩窄术治疗胃食管反流病的有效性及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2025, 12(04): 246-251.
[8] 杨磊, 熊见武, 沈宗文, 陈熊熊, 李滢旭. 腹腔镜胃袖状切除术后门静脉-肠系膜静脉血栓形成1例报道[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2026, 12(01): 72-77.
[9] 陈熊熊, 熊见武, 沈宗文, 杨磊, 李滢旭. 减重手术围术期利拉鲁肽致术中反流及胃内容物残留1例[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2026, 12(01): 78-83.
[10] 丁子洋, 徐红艳. 基于个案管理的减重手术术后依从性提升及疗效优化管理策略研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2026, 12(01): 44-49.
[11] 王昊杰, 习璞, 申晓军. 《人工智能在代谢减重外科中的现状和未来前景的国际专家共识》解读:基于28项共识声明的证据分析[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(04): 257-262.
[12] 韩晓东, 彭刚, 王晨, 班旭彦, 许听, 刘伟杰, 张弘玮. 单孔与多孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的短期效果比较:减重、心理状态及切口美观度分析[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(04): 263-269.
[13] 康星, 俞杭, 单晓东, 孙喜太, 褚薛慧. 单吻合口袖状胃空肠吻合术与单吻合口胃旁路术治疗肥胖症的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(04): 270-275.
[14] 许朱琳, 刘璐, 朱锦舟, 刘晓琳. 减重代谢手术从外科到内镜治疗的革新与进展[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(04): 303-310.
[15] 毛洁芹, 蒲雨馨, 柯志刚, 童卫东. 减重手术对结直肠癌发病风险的影响及其作用机制[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(04): 318-324.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?