切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 149 -154. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2025.04.004

教育培训

腹腔镜"四步法"在住院医师与进修医师规范化培训中的应用效果
李海云, 赵敏娴, 杨慧琪()   
  1. 100043 北京朝阳医院普外中心疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-27 出版日期:2025-11-15
  • 通信作者: 杨慧琪

Study on the application effect of the "four-step method" of laparoscopy in the standardized training of resident physicians and visiting physicians

Haiyun Li, Minxian Zhao, Huiqi Yang()   

  1. Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chao Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100043, China
  • Received:2025-11-27 Published:2025-11-15
  • Corresponding author: Huiqi Yang
引用本文:

李海云, 赵敏娴, 杨慧琪. 腹腔镜"四步法"在住院医师与进修医师规范化培训中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2025, 12(04): 149-154.

Haiyun Li, Minxian Zhao, Huiqi Yang. Study on the application effect of the "four-step method" of laparoscopy in the standardized training of resident physicians and visiting physicians[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2025, 12(04): 149-154.

目的

探讨联合Up To Date循证系统的四步法腹腔镜培训对住院医师和进修医师规范化培训的应用效果,并分析阶梯式技能训练与循证决策支持之间的协同效应。

方法

采用前瞻性随机对照设计,纳入首都医科大学第三临床医学院12名未受训医师(住院医师与进修医师1∶1匹配),随机分为研究组与对照组,研究组采用联合Up To Date医学循证系统的"理论-模拟-模型-临床"四步法阶梯式腹腔镜培训模式,对照组采用传统"师带徒"模式进行培训。采用独立样本t检验或χ2检验比较2组学员理论考核、客观结构化技术技能评估(OSATS)操作评分、临床决策能力及并发症处理效率的差异,比较研究组内住院医师与进修医师操作流畅性的差异,评估不同培训模式的效果。

结果

研究组理论考核得分、OSATS总分及紧急事件决策正确率均高于对照组[(92.4±3.1)分vs (85.7±4.2)分;(28.6±2.3)分vs (25.1±3.0)分;89.5% vs 73.2%],差异具有统计学意义(t=5.12,P<0.001;t=3.87,P=0.001;χ2=5.82,P=0.016)。研究组中,住院医师的操作流畅性提升幅度高于进修医师(Δ3.8±0.9分vs Δ1.2±0.7分,t=3.42,P=0.003)。

结论

联合Up To Date循证系统的腹腔镜四步法培训模式可显著提升不同层级医师的腹腔镜综合诊疗能力,尤其对低年资住院医师的基础操作能力提升效果明显。

Objective

To investigate the synergistic effect of the "Four-Step" laparoscopic training method combined with the Up To Date evidence-based system in the standardized training for resident physicians and visiting physicians, and analyze the synergistic effect between stepped skill training and evidence-based decision-making support.

Methods

A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted, involving 12 untrained physicians (with a 1:1 ratio of residents to fellows) from the Third Clinical Medical College of Capital Medical University. Participants were randomly assigned to either the experimental group or the control group. The study group received the staged "four-step" laparoscopic training integrated with the Up To Date evidence-based medical system, while the control group underwent traditional apprenticeship-style training. Independent-samples t-test or Chi-square test was used to compare the differences in theoretical assessment scores, Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) operation scores, clinical decision-making ability and complication management efficiency between the two groups of trainees, so as to evaluate the effects of different training modes.

Results

The study group demonstrated significantly better performance than the control group in perioperative theoretical scores, total OSATS scores, and correct decision rate in emergency scenarios (92.4±3.1 vs 85.7±4.2, 28.6±2.3 vs 25.1, 89.5% vs 73.2%), and the differences were statistically significant (t=5.12, P<0.001; t=3.87, P=0.001; χ2=5.82, P=0.016). Within the study group, residents showed a greater improvement in operational fluency compared to fellows (Δ3.8±0.9 vs Δ1.2±0.7, t=3.42, P=0.003).

Conclusion

The "Four-Step" method significantly combined with the Up To Date evidence-based system enhances comprehensive laparoscopic skills among multi-level physicians, with particularly notable improvement in basic operational skills for junior physicians.

表1 Up To Date循证系统四步法整合教学模式培训框架
表2 客观结构化技术技能评估操作评分标准
表3 2组住院医师和进修医师基线特征比较(±s
表4 2组住院医师和进修医师技能考核结果比较
1
刘斌, 黄雨桦, 杨珵璨, 等. 腹腔镜模拟培训在外科住院医师规范化培训中的应用 [J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2023, 28(7): 547-549, 560.
2
Zhou S, Wang X, Zhao C, et al. Laparoscopic vs open colorectal cancer surgery in elderly patients: short- and long-term outcomes and predictors for overall and disease-free survival [J]. BMC Surg, 2019, 19(1): 137.
3
Assali S, Mourany J, Jones B, et al. Technical approach to laparoscopic examination of the small bowel in gallstone ileus [J]. Case Rep Surg, 2020, 2020: 8852804.
4
Bao M, Cai W, Zhu S, et al. Carbon dioxide embolism with severe hypotension as an initial symptom during laparoscopy: a case report [J]. J Int Med Res, 2021, 49(4): 3000605211004765.
5
Li J, Xiong Y, Yang G, et al. Complete laparoscopic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: technical aspects and long-term results from a single center [J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2021, 16(1): 62-75.
6
庞涛, 陈玮, 丁鸿, 等. 面向规培生的腹腔镜基本技能培训体系的应用研究 [J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2023, 28(10): 779-783.
7
Krüger B, Hegele M, Rieger M. The multisensory nature of human action imagery [J]. Psychol Res, 2024, 88(6): 1870-1882.
8
Sarıkaya AF, Tarım K, Köseoğlu E, et al. The contribution of personalized video feedback to robotic partial nephrectomy training in realistic 3D tumor kidney models: design, production and implementation [J]. Front Surg, 2025, 12: 1615817.
9
胡奇达, 阙日升, 梁廷波. 多模式新媒体辅助CBL教学法在腹腔镜胆囊切除术规范化培训中的应用 [J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2023(7): 125-127.
10
张妲, 周广鑫, 肖黎. UpToDate临床顾问在疑难病诊断中的应用 [J]. 医学与哲学, 2024, 45(18): 73-76.
11
Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents [J]. Br J Surg, 1997, 84(2): 273-278.
12
Somashekhar SP, Deshpande AY, Ashwin KR, et al. Comparative evaluation of the short-term treatment outcomes between open, laparoscopic- and robotic-assisted surgical approaches for rectal cancer treatment [J]. Indian J Surg Oncol, 2020, 11(4): 649-652.
13
Fu VX, Oomens P, Kleinrensink VEE, et al. The effect of preferred music on mental workload and laparoscopic surgical performance in a simulated setting (OPTIMISE): a randomized controlled crossover study [J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(9): 5051-5061.
14
Desir A, Marques C, Farah E, et al. Validity and reliability evidence support task-specific metrics for laparoscopic fundoplication [J]. Surg Endosc, 2024, 38(4): 2219-2230.
15
Lohre R, Bois AJ, Pollock JW, et al. Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality on orthopedic surgical skills and knowledge acquisition among senior surgical residents: a randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA Network Open, 2020, 3(12): e2031217.
[1] 彭兵. 联合血管切除重建的腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术实践与探索[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(1): 23-23.
[2] 张锰钢, 刘悦泽, 张太平. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的关键技术和质量控制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 210-214.
[3] 杨永君, 王槐志. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术主要并发症及处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 215-218.
[4] 付丽坤, 崔红梅, 高福来, 乔红, 冯钟煦. 腹腔镜下胆总管探查“T”管引流术与经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术治疗继发性胆总管结石的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 226-230.
[5] 赵方, 陈廷昊, 陈泳松, 王健宇, 刘希. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术在高龄患者中的安全性及有效性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 231-234.
[6] 王学军, 唐水斌, 艾武. LCBDE与ERCP+EST分别联合LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 235-238.
[7] 李伟, 张伟, 崔啸晨, 张涛涛, 王海超. 腹腔镜精准肝蒂解剖法切除术与常规切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 244-247.
[8] 辛林璞, 杨敏, 杜峻峰. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后常见并发症防治与管理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 248-251.
[9] 赵军抗, 张前进, 庄惠杰. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术保留左结肠动脉的疗效及对预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 257-260.
[10] 魏利敏, 金鲜珍, 刘萍, 王光辉. 两种微创术式治疗低位直肠癌的学习曲线与近期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 261-266.
[11] 孔宪诚, 沙粒, 杜磊, 张浩. 逆蠕动与顺蠕动腔内回肠-结肠吻合术在TLRC中的临床对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 267-270.
[12] 马冬冬, 赵强, 赵冠儒. 双镜联合胆总管切开取石一期缝合治疗胆总管结石的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 275-278.
[13] 刘志烨, 谢启帆, 叶楚津, 谢海标, 韦琨, 钟方千俞, 蒲小勇. 后入路联合外侧入路在机器人辅助膀胱癌根治术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 261-266.
[14] 何子勤, 李俊涛, 张翼飞, 肖楚天, 赵阳杰, 钟文文, 叶雷, 邱剑光, 王德娟. 机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜肾盂成形术在小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 279-284.
[15] 国际肝胆胰协会中国分会. Laennec间隙引导肝胆外科手术专家共识(2026版)[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 281-289.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?