切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 01 ›› Issue (01) : 36 -38. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2014.01.010

所属专题: 总编推荐 文献

论著

GerdQ量表在胃食管反流病诊断中的应用
王志1, 张成1, 王俭1, 克力木·阿不都热依木1,(), 李慧玲1, 尹兴瑞1, 苏福增1   
  1. 1. 830000 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创外科、疝与腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-02 出版日期:2014-11-15
  • 通信作者: 克力木·阿不都热依木
  • 基金资助:
    乌鲁木齐市科学技术计划资助项目(No. G131320003)

Value of GerdQ for diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Zhi Wang1, Cheng Zhang1, Jian Wang1, Abudureyimu Kelimu·1,(), Huiling Li1, Xingrui Yin1, Fuzeng Su1   

  1. 1. Department of Minimally invasive, Hernia And Abdominal Wall Surgery, The People′s Hospital of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumchi 830001, China
  • Received:2014-11-02 Published:2014-11-15
  • Corresponding author: Abudureyimu Kelimu·
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Kelimu·Abudureyimu, Email:
引用本文:

王志, 张成, 王俭, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 李慧玲, 尹兴瑞, 苏福增. GerdQ量表在胃食管反流病诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2014, 01(01): 36-38.

Zhi Wang, Cheng Zhang, Jian Wang, Abudureyimu Kelimu·, Huiling Li, Xingrui Yin, Fuzeng Su. Value of GerdQ for diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2014, 01(01): 36-38.

目的

探讨胃食管反流病量表(GerdQ)应用于诊断胃食管反流病(GERD)的价值。

方法

对2013年6月至2014年10月在新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院就诊收住并存在反流相关症状的疑似胃食管反流病的1 000例患者进行问卷调查,按照烧心、反流、上腹痛、恶心、睡眠障碍、是否服用OTC药物等6项症状的发作频率进行评分。采用上消化道内镜检查及食管24 h pH监测作为GERD诊断的标准,并与GerdQ分值进行比较,最后计算出诊断GERD的临界值,进而分析GerdQ量表在GERD中的诊断价值。

结果

GERD组的GerdQ积分主要集中于7~12分,非GERD组主要集中于6分以下,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。以GerdQ分值8为临界值,Youden指数最大(0.51),ROC曲线下的面积0.765,其敏感度为81.32%,特异性为70.21%,阳性预测值83.24%,阴性预测值61.53%。

结论

GerdQ量表简单、易行,可作为临床上筛查诊断GERD的有效方法。

Objective

To explore the validation of the gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaires (GerdQ) for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Methods

A total of 1 000 patients who existed of reflux symptoms were surveyed of in The People′s Hospital of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from June 2013 to October 2014, which was used to investigate reflux - related symptoms including heartburn, reflux, epigastric pain, nausea, sleep disturbance, and additional medicine (over the counter medication). The results of their upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and 24-hour esophageal pH-impedance monitoring were compared with GerdQ score to determine the diagnostic cut- off score for GERD and analyze the validation of the GerdQ for the diagnosis of GERD.

Results

GerdQ scores of GERD group focused primarily on 7-12 points, GerdQ scores of control group focused primarily on the following six points, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Taking 8 as GerdQ cut- off score for GERD, we got the maximal Youden index (0.51), in which the area under ROC was 0.765, with a sensitivity of 81.32% and specificity of 70.21%, the true positive diagnostic rate 83.24%, while true negative diagnostic rate 61.53%.

Conclusion

GerdQ is simple, easy, effective method, it can be used as the preliminary clinical diagnosis of GERD.

表1 胃食管反流病量表(分)
图1 胃食管反流病量表诊断受试者工作特征曲线
1
Philip O, Lauren B, Marcelo F. Guidenlines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2013, 108: 308-328.
2
De Vault KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for the Diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 1999, 94(6): 1434-1442.
3
Wang R, Yan X, Ma XQ, et al. Burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Shanghai, China[J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2009, 41(2): 110-115.
4
Jones R, Junghard O, Dent J, et al. Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in primary care[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2009, 30(10): 1030-1038.
5
Della Casa D, Missale G, Cestari R. GerdQ: tool for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in primary care. Recenti Prog Med, 2010, 101(3): 115-117.
6
Dent J, Vakil N, Jones R, et al. A managementst rategy for GERD base on the gastroesephageal reflux disease questionnaire(GerdQ). Gut, 2007, 56 suppl 111: A75.
7
中国胃食管反流病研究协作组.反流性疾病问卷在胃食管反流病诊断中的价值.中华消化杂志,2003,23(11):651-654.
8
Bösner S, Haasenritter J, Becker A, et al. Heartburn or angina? Differentiating gastrointestinal disease in primary care patients presenting with chest pain: a cross sectional diagnostic study[J]. Int Arch Med, 2009, 2: 40.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 唐金侨, 叶宇佳, 王港, 赵彬, 马艳宁. 医学影像学检查方法在颞下颌关节紊乱病中临床应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 406-411.
[3] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[4] 白浪, 张雪玉, 白铁成, 贺爱军. 腹腔镜近端胃切除术中圆锥形重叠吻合成形术对Siewert Ⅱ型AEG患者胃食管反流、营养状态的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 679-682.
[5] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[6] 熊鹰, 林敬莱, 白奇, 郭剑明, 王烁. 肾癌自动化病理诊断:AI离临床还有多远?[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 535-540.
[7] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[8] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[9] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[10] 王秋生. 胆道良性疾病诊疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 779-782.
[11] 李浩, 陈棋帅, 费发珠, 张宁伟, 李元东, 王硕晨, 任宾. 慢性肝病肝纤维化无创诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 863-867.
[12] 谭瑞义. 小细胞骨肉瘤诊断及治疗研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 781-784.
[13] 王子阳, 王宏宾, 刘晓旌. 血清标志物对甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 677-681.
[14] 陈慧, 邹祖鹏, 周田田, 张艺丹, 张海萍. 皮肤镜对头皮红斑性皮肤病辅助鉴别诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 692-698.
[15] 胡云鹤, 周玉焯, 付瑞瑛, 于凡, 李爱东. CHS-DRG付费制度下GB1分组住院费用影响因素分析与管理策略探讨[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 568-574.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?