切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 01 ›› Issue (01) : 36 -38. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2014.01.010

所属专题: 总编推荐 文献

论著

GerdQ量表在胃食管反流病诊断中的应用
王志1, 张成1, 王俭1, 克力木·阿不都热依木1,(), 李慧玲1, 尹兴瑞1, 苏福增1   
  1. 1. 830000 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创外科、疝与腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-02 出版日期:2014-11-15
  • 通信作者: 克力木·阿不都热依木
  • 基金资助:
    乌鲁木齐市科学技术计划资助项目(No. G131320003)

Value of GerdQ for diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Zhi Wang1, Cheng Zhang1, Jian Wang1, Abudureyimu Kelimu·1,(), Huiling Li1, Xingrui Yin1, Fuzeng Su1   

  1. 1. Department of Minimally invasive, Hernia And Abdominal Wall Surgery, The People′s Hospital of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumchi 830001, China
  • Received:2014-11-02 Published:2014-11-15
  • Corresponding author: Abudureyimu Kelimu·
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Kelimu·Abudureyimu, Email:
引用本文:

王志, 张成, 王俭, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 李慧玲, 尹兴瑞, 苏福增. GerdQ量表在胃食管反流病诊断中的应用[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2014, 01(01): 36-38.

Zhi Wang, Cheng Zhang, Jian Wang, Abudureyimu Kelimu·, Huiling Li, Xingrui Yin, Fuzeng Su. Value of GerdQ for diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2014, 01(01): 36-38.

目的

探讨胃食管反流病量表(GerdQ)应用于诊断胃食管反流病(GERD)的价值。

方法

对2013年6月至2014年10月在新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院就诊收住并存在反流相关症状的疑似胃食管反流病的1 000例患者进行问卷调查,按照烧心、反流、上腹痛、恶心、睡眠障碍、是否服用OTC药物等6项症状的发作频率进行评分。采用上消化道内镜检查及食管24 h pH监测作为GERD诊断的标准,并与GerdQ分值进行比较,最后计算出诊断GERD的临界值,进而分析GerdQ量表在GERD中的诊断价值。

结果

GERD组的GerdQ积分主要集中于7~12分,非GERD组主要集中于6分以下,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。以GerdQ分值8为临界值,Youden指数最大(0.51),ROC曲线下的面积0.765,其敏感度为81.32%,特异性为70.21%,阳性预测值83.24%,阴性预测值61.53%。

结论

GerdQ量表简单、易行,可作为临床上筛查诊断GERD的有效方法。

Objective

To explore the validation of the gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaires (GerdQ) for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Methods

A total of 1 000 patients who existed of reflux symptoms were surveyed of in The People′s Hospital of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from June 2013 to October 2014, which was used to investigate reflux - related symptoms including heartburn, reflux, epigastric pain, nausea, sleep disturbance, and additional medicine (over the counter medication). The results of their upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and 24-hour esophageal pH-impedance monitoring were compared with GerdQ score to determine the diagnostic cut- off score for GERD and analyze the validation of the GerdQ for the diagnosis of GERD.

Results

GerdQ scores of GERD group focused primarily on 7-12 points, GerdQ scores of control group focused primarily on the following six points, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Taking 8 as GerdQ cut- off score for GERD, we got the maximal Youden index (0.51), in which the area under ROC was 0.765, with a sensitivity of 81.32% and specificity of 70.21%, the true positive diagnostic rate 83.24%, while true negative diagnostic rate 61.53%.

Conclusion

GerdQ is simple, easy, effective method, it can be used as the preliminary clinical diagnosis of GERD.

表1 胃食管反流病量表(分)
图1 胃食管反流病量表诊断受试者工作特征曲线
1
Philip O, Lauren B, Marcelo F. Guidenlines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2013, 108: 308-328.
2
De Vault KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for the Diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 1999, 94(6): 1434-1442.
3
Wang R, Yan X, Ma XQ, et al. Burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Shanghai, China[J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2009, 41(2): 110-115.
4
Jones R, Junghard O, Dent J, et al. Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in primary care[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2009, 30(10): 1030-1038.
5
Della Casa D, Missale G, Cestari R. GerdQ: tool for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in primary care. Recenti Prog Med, 2010, 101(3): 115-117.
6
Dent J, Vakil N, Jones R, et al. A managementst rategy for GERD base on the gastroesephageal reflux disease questionnaire(GerdQ). Gut, 2007, 56 suppl 111: A75.
7
中国胃食管反流病研究协作组.反流性疾病问卷在胃食管反流病诊断中的价值.中华消化杂志,2003,23(11):651-654.
8
Bösner S, Haasenritter J, Becker A, et al. Heartburn or angina? Differentiating gastrointestinal disease in primary care patients presenting with chest pain: a cross sectional diagnostic study[J]. Int Arch Med, 2009, 2: 40.
[1] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[2] 蒋佳纯, 王晓冰, 陈培荣, 许世豪. 血清学指标联合常规超声及超声造影评分诊断原发性干燥综合征的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 622-630.
[3] 谭巧, 苏小涵, 侯令密, 黎君彦, 邓世山. 乳腺髓样癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 366-368.
[4] 杨小菁, 姜瑞瑞, 石玉香, 王静静, 李长天. 乳腺孤立性纤维性肿瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 375-377.
[5] 冯雪园, 韩萌萌, 马宁. 乳腺原发上皮样血管内皮瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 378-380.
[6] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[7] 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 大数据及人工智能对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断及风险预测[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 549-552.
[8] 许丁伟, 马江云, 李新成, 黄洁. Alagille综合征疑诊为先天性胆道闭锁一例并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 681-687.
[9] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[10] 赵立力, 王魁向, 张小冲, 李志远. 血沉与C-反应蛋白比值在假体周围感染中的诊断价值分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 351-355.
[11] 吴凤芸, 滕鑫, 刘连娟. 高帧频超声造影与增强磁共振对不同直径原发性高分化肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 404-408.
[12] 孙欣欣, 刘军, 陈超伍, 孙超. 超声内镜引导细针穿刺抽吸术在胰腺占位性病变中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 418-421.
[13] 袁媛, 赵良平, 刘智慧, 张丽萍, 谭丽梅, 閤梦琴. 子宫内膜癌组织中miR-25-3p、PTEN的表达及与病理参数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1016-1020.
[14] 李田, 徐洪, 刘和亮. 尘肺病的相关研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 900-905.
[15] 周婷, 孙培培, 张二明, 安欣华, 向平超. 北京市石景山区40岁及以上居民慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断现状调查[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 790-797.
阅读次数
全文


摘要