切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (03) : 193 -196. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2020.03.012

所属专题: 文献

护理园地

精细化护理干预在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术护理配合中的作用
杨晓雪1, 蒋媛2,()   
  1. 1. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院中心手术室
    2. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创、疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-15 出版日期:2020-08-15
  • 通信作者: 蒋媛

Role of fine nursing intervention in nursing cooperation of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair

Xiaoxue Yang1, Yuan Jiang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Central Operating Room, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumuqi 830001, China
    2. Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery、Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumuqi 830001, China
  • Received:2020-03-15 Published:2020-08-15
  • Corresponding author: Yuan Jiang
引用本文:

杨晓雪, 蒋媛. 精细化护理干预在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术护理配合中的作用[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2020, 07(03): 193-196.

Xiaoxue Yang, Yuan Jiang. Role of fine nursing intervention in nursing cooperation of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2020, 07(03): 193-196.

目的

探讨精细化护理在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补手术中的作用。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2019年12月,于新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院手术室行腹腔镜食管裂孔山修补术的300例患者的病例资料。将2018年1月至12月的150例腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术患者作为对照组,2019年1月至12月的150例作为实验组,对实验组的手术护理配合采取精细化护理,对照组采用常规管理方法,比较实施前后两组患者术中相关并发症的发生情况、手术室工作效率、患者满意度、医师满意度。计量资料用均数±标准差(

xˉ
±s)表示,采用t检验,计数资料用百分率(%)表示,采用χ2检验。

结果

实验组术中压力性损伤、低体温、深静脉血栓等并发症发生率低于对照组,两者比较的差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.147,4.253,4.124;P<0.05)。实验组患者在周转时间、准备物品时间、手术用时上均缩短,两者比较的差异有统计学意义(F=69.437,48.394;P<0.05)。两组患者满意度的差异具有统计学意义(χ2=4.353,P<0.05)。两组患者术后对医师满意度的差异具有统计学意义(χ2=0.605,P<0.05)。

结论

精细化护理干预在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的应用具有明显的效果,此方法值得推广。

Objective

To explore the role of fine nursing in laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia. Methods the clinical data of 300 patients who underwent laparoscopic esophageal hiatus repair in the operating room of people's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from January 2018 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.

Methods

150 cases of patients with laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair from January to December 2018 were selected as the control group, and 150 cases from January to December 2019 were selected as the experimental group. The operation nursing cooperation of the experimental group was treated with fine nursing, while the control group was treated with conventional management methods. The occurrence of intraoperative complications, operating room efficiency, patient satisfaction and physician satisfaction of the two groups before and after the implementation were compared It's a matter of intention. The measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (±s) by t test, and the count data were expressed as percentage (%) by chi square test.

Results

the incidence of intraoperative pressure injury, hypothermia, deep venous thrombosis and other complications in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.147, 4.253, 4.124; P<0.05). The turnover time, preparation time and operation time of the experimental group were shorter than those of the control group (F=69.437, 48.394; P<0.05). The difference of satisfaction between the two groups was statistically significant (χ2=4.353, P<0.05). There was a significant difference in the satisfaction of the two groups (χ2=0.605, P<0.05).

Conclusion

the application of fine nursing intervention in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair has obvious effect, which is worthy of promotion.

表1 实施前后手术患者术中相关并发症发生情况比较(例)
表2 实施前后手术室工作效率对比(
xˉ
±s,min)
表3 两组患者满意度的比较
表4 两组患者术后对医师满意度的比较(例)
1
于涛,曾多,李建业,等. 滑动型食管裂孔疝的外科治疗[J]. 中华外科杂志,2004,42(11):654.
2
克力木,张成,牛伟亚,等. 腹腔镜下Toupet胃底折叠术式治疗食管裂孔疝的临床应用[J]. 国际外科学杂志,2009,36(9):594-597.
3
高静. 设置手术室专科护士的体会[J].护理实践与研究,2010,7(16):84-85.
4
王桂红,陈荣珠. 肝脏手术术中低体温的原因分析及护理进展[J]. 临床护理杂志,2012,11(4):53-56.
5
林岩. 实用手术护理学[M]. 广州:中山大学出版社,2006,162.
6
姚丽,丁楠楠,杨丽平,等[J]. 中国循证医学杂志,2018,10(18):1086-1092
7
张颖,赵颖,李萍,等. 品管圈活动在统一器械护士摆台操作规范中的作用[J]. 中日友好医院学报,2016,30(1):58.
8
马育璇,朱映霞,罗桂元. 规范术前访视内容对访视质量的影响[J]. 现代临床护理杂志,2007,6(3):28-29.
9
许巧玲,冯娟,王日星. 精细化管理在医院手术室管理中的应用效果分析[J]. 医院管理,2012,19(18):142-144.
10
李旭英,李星凤,汤新辉,等. 《新入职护士规范化培训大纲》的践行与效果评价[J]. 护理学杂志,2017,32(6):61-63.
11
郭月,余云红,赵体玉. 手术室患者压疮临床特点的回顾性分析口[J].护理学杂志,2014,29(24):36-39.
12
熊環,高兴莲,杨英,等. 心血管疾病手术患者术中压疮的动态评估及预防研究[J]. 护理学杂志,2018,33(10):52-55.
13
Lu CX, Chen HL, Shen WQ, et al. A new nomogram score for predicting surgery-related pressure ulcers in cardiovascular surgical patients[J]. Int Wound J, 2017, 14(1):226-232.
14
李志娟,张红棉,邱爱芬. 泌尿外科腹腔镜手术患者围术期低体 温及寒战的影响因素分析与护理干预对策[J]. 护理实践与研究,2019,16(8):68-70.
15
宋利红. 护理干预对骨科术后下肢深静脉血栓的预防作用[J]. 中国社区医师,2013,15(4):347-346.
16
曾莹. 手术室的带教与管理[J]. 中国医药导刊,2012,14(3):531-533.
17
王彩云,张颖. 手术室护理的专科化发展与展望. 中国护理管理,2013,13(5):5-7.
[1] 邢建坤, 王菲, 王兢, 李云生, 吴迪, 陈晓敏, 杨磊, 李东毅, 孙丽莹, 朱志军. "图文式护理准备清单"在腹腔镜活体供肝获取术中的应用[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 118-123.
[2] 仇艳宇, 周玲玲, 刘翠, 张亚会. 基于临床护理路径的精细化护理在小儿腹股沟疝围术期中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 455-458.
[3] 王双妮, 刘艳琴, 王晶, 张瑜, 张敏, 薛琼, 李静, 张欢. 肺癌化疗患者知情情况及其对护理配合的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(05): 698-700.
[4] 王玲, 钟薇, 潘俊玲, 李斌. 精细化护理对结直肠息肉患者康复期胃肠道恢复的影响[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 07(06): 584-588.
[5] 唐利敏, 段国恒. 优质护理配合对于胃镜下胃息肉电切术的护理效果[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2019, 06(03): 118-120.
[6] 马晓婷, 赵叶. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术和胃底折叠术围手术期护理要点总结[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2020, 07(01): 68-70.
[7] 梅静, 赵晓亮, 赵莉. 维汉患者在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中丙泊酚的用量比较[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2019, 06(03): 148-151.
[8] 舒玲, 王朝阳. 270例腹腔镜代谢手术护理配合[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2020, 06(01): 66-69.
阅读次数
全文


摘要