切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (01) : 27 -31. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2021.01.005

论著

1047例经内镜逆行性胰胆管造影术的临床分析
艾合买江·库尔班,1, 布娅·米然别克1   
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-27 出版日期:2021-02-15
  • 通信作者: 艾合买江·库尔班

Clinical analysis of 1047 cases of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Aihemaijiang·kuerban,1, Buya·miranbieke1   

  1. 1. Department Gastroenterology of People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830001, China
  • Received:2020-03-27 Published:2021-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Aihemaijiang·kuerban
引用本文:

艾合买江·库尔班, 布娅·米然别克. 1047例经内镜逆行性胰胆管造影术的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2021, 08(01): 27-31.

Aihemaijiang·kuerban, Buya·miranbieke. Clinical analysis of 1047 cases of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2021, 08(01): 27-31.

目的

探讨不同操作难度的内镜逆行性胰胆管造影术(ERCP)与ERCP术成功率、操作时间和并发症的差别。

方法

回顾性分析2009年1月至2018年12月于新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院消化科行ERCP术1047例患者的病例资料。根据ERCP操作难度分级将其分为4个不同等级并比较不同操作难度ERCP的插管成功率、操作时间和并发症发生率的差别。

结果

根据ERCP操作难度分级,将1047例病例分成四级,其中1级患者42例,2级813例,3级188例,4级4例;1~3级病例插管成功率均在95%及以上,差别无统计学意义,而4级插管成功率仅为50%,与其他3级比较的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);操作时间从1级到4级逐渐增加,各级比较的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后并发症发生率随着难度程度的增加而增加,1~3级之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),3级与4级之间差异无统计学意义。

结论

随着ERCP操作难度级别的上升,插管成功率下降,操作时间增加,且并发症的发生率上升,故手术操作实行医师分级对降低操作风险和并发症发生率有重要意义。

Objective

To explore the differences between the different difficulty of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) ERCP operation and the success rate,operation time, and complications of ERCP;

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made of 1047 patients who underwent ERCP in the Department of Gastroenterology, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People's Hospital from January 2009 to December 2018. According to the difficulty classification of ERCP, the patients were divided into four grades. The success rate of ERCP intubation, operation time, and incidence of complications was compared between them;

Results

According to the difficulty classification of ERCP operation, 1047 cases were divided into four grades, including 42 cases of grade 1, 813 cases of grade 2, 188 cases of grade 3 and 4 cases of grade 4. The success rate of intubation in Grade 1-3 cases was 95% or more, with no statistical significance, while the success rate of grade 4 intubation was only 50%. There was a significant difference between grades 1, 2, and 3 (P<0.05). The operation time gradually increased from level 1 to 4, and there was a significant difference between different levels (P<0.05). The incidence of complications increased with the degree of difficulty. There was a considerabl difference between grade 1 and grade 3 (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between grade 3 and grade 4;

Conclusions

As the level of ERCP operation rises, the success rate of intubation decreases, the operation time increases, and the incidence of complications increases. Therefore, it is essential to carry out the graded operation by physicians to reduce the risk of process and complications.

表1 ERCP操作难度分级表[1]
表2 1047例ERCP手术病例操作难度分级表
图1 不同ERCP操作难度之间插管成功率之比
图2 不同ERCP操作难度之间手术时间的比较
图3 不同ERCP操作难度之间并发症发生率之比
表3 不同操作难度的ERCP术后并发症分析
1
中华医学会消化内镜学分会ERCP学组, 中国医师协会消化医师分会胆胰学组, 国家消化系统疾病临床医学研究中心. 中国ERCP指南(2018版) [J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2018,35(11).
2
Cotton P B, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 1991,37(3):383-393.
3
Vezakis A, Fragulidis G, Polydorou A. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations: Diagnosis and management [J]. World J Gastrointest Endosc, 2015,7(14):1135-1141.
4
Torun S, Parlak E, Yıldız H, et al. Assessment of the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography grading system: A prospective study from a tertiary care center [J]. Turk J Gastroenterol, 2016,27(2):187-191.
5
Elmunzer B J. Reducing the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis [J]. Dig Endosc, 2017,29(7):749-757.
6
Freeman M L, DiSario J A, Nelson D B, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2001,54(4):425-434.
7
Mine T, Morizane T, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Clinical practice guideline for post-ERCP pancreatitis [J]. J Gastroenterol, 2017,52(9):1013-1022.
8
Oh H C, El H I, Easler J J, et al. Post-ERCP Bleeding in the Era of Multiple Antiplatelet Agents [J]. Gut Liver, 2018,12(2):214-218.
9
Lee M H, Tsou Y K, Lin C H, et al. Predictors of re-bleeding after endoscopic hemostasis for delayed post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2016,22(11):3196-3201.
10
Johnson K D, Perisetti A, Tharian B, et al. Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-Related Complications and Their Management Strategies: A "Scoping" Literature Review [J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2020,65(2):361-375.
11
白晓庆, 黄华, 张映媛, 等. 经内镜逆行性胰胆管造影术后并发症的防治进展 [J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志, 2017,26(7).
12
Bove V, Tringali A, Familiari P, et al. ERCP in patients with prior Billroth II gastrectomy: report of 30 years' experience [J]. Endoscopy, 2015,47(7):611-616.
13
吴文广, 张文杰, 顾钧, 等. 消化道术后经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的特点、分类和处理策略 [J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2017,34(4).
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[8] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[9] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[10] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[11] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[12] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[13] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[14] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[15] 石阳, 于剑锋, 曹可, 翟志伟, 叶春祥, 王振军, 韩加刚. 可扩张金属支架置入联合新辅助化疗治疗完全梗阻性左半结肠癌围手术期并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 464-471.
阅读次数
全文
2
HTML PDF
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版 最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 0 0 0 2

  来源 其他网站
  次数 2
  比例 100%

摘要
61
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 61
  来源 本网站 其他网站
  次数 22 39
  比例 36% 64%