切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (01) : 27 -31. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2021.01.005

论著

1047例经内镜逆行性胰胆管造影术的临床分析
艾合买江·库尔班1,(), 布娅·米然别克1   
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-27 出版日期:2021-02-15
  • 通信作者: 艾合买江·库尔班

Clinical analysis of 1047 cases of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Aihemaijiang·kuerban1,(), Buya·miranbieke1   

  1. 1. Department Gastroenterology of People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830001, China
  • Received:2020-03-27 Published:2021-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Aihemaijiang·kuerban
引用本文:

艾合买江·库尔班, 布娅·米然别克. 1047例经内镜逆行性胰胆管造影术的临床分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2021, 08(01): 27-31.

Aihemaijiang·kuerban, Buya·miranbieke. Clinical analysis of 1047 cases of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2021, 08(01): 27-31.

目的

探讨不同操作难度的内镜逆行性胰胆管造影术(ERCP)与ERCP术成功率、操作时间和并发症的差别。

方法

回顾性分析2009年1月至2018年12月于新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院消化科行ERCP术1047例患者的病例资料。根据ERCP操作难度分级将其分为4个不同等级并比较不同操作难度ERCP的插管成功率、操作时间和并发症发生率的差别。

结果

根据ERCP操作难度分级,将1047例病例分成四级,其中1级患者42例,2级813例,3级188例,4级4例;1~3级病例插管成功率均在95%及以上,差别无统计学意义,而4级插管成功率仅为50%,与其他3级比较的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);操作时间从1级到4级逐渐增加,各级比较的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后并发症发生率随着难度程度的增加而增加,1~3级之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),3级与4级之间差异无统计学意义。

结论

随着ERCP操作难度级别的上升,插管成功率下降,操作时间增加,且并发症的发生率上升,故手术操作实行医师分级对降低操作风险和并发症发生率有重要意义。

Objective

To explore the differences between the different difficulty of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) ERCP operation and the success rate,operation time, and complications of ERCP;

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made of 1047 patients who underwent ERCP in the Department of Gastroenterology, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People's Hospital from January 2009 to December 2018. According to the difficulty classification of ERCP, the patients were divided into four grades. The success rate of ERCP intubation, operation time, and incidence of complications was compared between them;

Results

According to the difficulty classification of ERCP operation, 1047 cases were divided into four grades, including 42 cases of grade 1, 813 cases of grade 2, 188 cases of grade 3 and 4 cases of grade 4. The success rate of intubation in Grade 1-3 cases was 95% or more, with no statistical significance, while the success rate of grade 4 intubation was only 50%. There was a significant difference between grades 1, 2, and 3 (P<0.05). The operation time gradually increased from level 1 to 4, and there was a significant difference between different levels (P<0.05). The incidence of complications increased with the degree of difficulty. There was a considerabl difference between grade 1 and grade 3 (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between grade 3 and grade 4;

Conclusions

As the level of ERCP operation rises, the success rate of intubation decreases, the operation time increases, and the incidence of complications increases. Therefore, it is essential to carry out the graded operation by physicians to reduce the risk of process and complications.

表1 ERCP操作难度分级表[1]
表2 1047例ERCP手术病例操作难度分级表
图1 不同ERCP操作难度之间插管成功率之比
图2 不同ERCP操作难度之间手术时间的比较
图3 不同ERCP操作难度之间并发症发生率之比
表3 不同操作难度的ERCP术后并发症分析
1
中华医学会消化内镜学分会ERCP学组, 中国医师协会消化医师分会胆胰学组, 国家消化系统疾病临床医学研究中心. 中国ERCP指南(2018版) [J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2018,35(11).
2
Cotton P B, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 1991,37(3):383-393.
3
Vezakis A, Fragulidis G, Polydorou A. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations: Diagnosis and management [J]. World J Gastrointest Endosc, 2015,7(14):1135-1141.
4
Torun S, Parlak E, Yıldız H, et al. Assessment of the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography grading system: A prospective study from a tertiary care center [J]. Turk J Gastroenterol, 2016,27(2):187-191.
5
Elmunzer B J. Reducing the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis [J]. Dig Endosc, 2017,29(7):749-757.
6
Freeman M L, DiSario J A, Nelson D B, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2001,54(4):425-434.
7
Mine T, Morizane T, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Clinical practice guideline for post-ERCP pancreatitis [J]. J Gastroenterol, 2017,52(9):1013-1022.
8
Oh H C, El H I, Easler J J, et al. Post-ERCP Bleeding in the Era of Multiple Antiplatelet Agents [J]. Gut Liver, 2018,12(2):214-218.
9
Lee M H, Tsou Y K, Lin C H, et al. Predictors of re-bleeding after endoscopic hemostasis for delayed post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2016,22(11):3196-3201.
10
Johnson K D, Perisetti A, Tharian B, et al. Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-Related Complications and Their Management Strategies: A "Scoping" Literature Review [J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2020,65(2):361-375.
11
白晓庆, 黄华, 张映媛, 等. 经内镜逆行性胰胆管造影术后并发症的防治进展 [J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志, 2017,26(7).
12
Bove V, Tringali A, Familiari P, et al. ERCP in patients with prior Billroth II gastrectomy: report of 30 years' experience [J]. Endoscopy, 2015,47(7):611-616.
13
吴文广, 张文杰, 顾钧, 等. 消化道术后经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的特点、分类和处理策略 [J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2017,34(4).
[1] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[2] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[3] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[4] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[5] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[6] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[7] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[8] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[9] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[10] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[11] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[12] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[13] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[14] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[15] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
阅读次数
全文


摘要