切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (02) : 85 -88. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2021.02.008

论著

腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术25例疗效分析
阿卜来提·艾则孜1,(), 阿地力·阿布拉2   
  1. 1. 848000 和田,新疆民心医院
    2. 848200 洛浦县人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-29 出版日期:2021-05-15
  • 通信作者: 阿卜来提·艾则孜

Clinical analysis of 25 cases of laparoscopic esophageal hiatal hernia repair

Abolaiti·Aizezi1,(), Adili·Abula2   

  1. 1. Department of Xinjiang Minxin hospital, Hetian 848000, China
    2. Department of Xinjiang Luopu hospital, Hetian 848200, China
  • Received:2021-01-29 Published:2021-05-15
  • Corresponding author: Abolaiti·Aizezi
引用本文:

阿卜来提·艾则孜, 阿地力·阿布拉. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术25例疗效分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2021, 08(02): 85-88.

Abolaiti·Aizezi, Adili·Abula. Clinical analysis of 25 cases of laparoscopic esophageal hiatal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2021, 08(02): 85-88.

目的

探讨腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术在基层医院的治疗效果。

方法

选择2017年9月至2019年9月,新疆民心医院被诊断为食管裂孔疝行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术患者25例,其中胃底360°折叠术(Nissen术)患者18例,胃底270°部分折叠术(Toupet术)患者7例,所有患者术前和术后均填写胃食管反流病调查问卷(Gerd Q),并对患者术前与术后Gerd Q评分、食管外症状的差别进行统计学分析。

结果

25例腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术全部成功。手术时间110(70~190)min,失血量10~50 ml;术后24~48 h 进流质饮食,无手术切口感染、术后大出血、补片不良反应等并发症发生;所有患者平均住院时间7~11 d,术后平均随访8.6个月,多数患者术后胸痛、反酸、嗳气、哮喘等症状明显得到改善,术前与术后比较Gerd Q评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术是一种可行的手术方法,手术效果满意,在基层医院临床上值得进一步推广价值。

Objective

Laparoscopic hiatal herniorrhaphy has become the standard practice for most surgeons to perform anti-reflux surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic esophageal hiatal herniorrhaphy.

Methods

a total of 25 patients with esophageal hiatal hernia diagnosed in our hospital from 2017 to 2019 were treated with laparoscopic esophageal hiatal herniorrhaphy, including 7 cases of gastric fundus partial folding (Toupet) and 18 cases of gastric fundus folding (Nissen). All patients completed gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (Gerd Q) before and after operation, and the differences of Gerd Q and extraesophageal symptoms before and after operation were statistically analyzed.

Results

all the 25 cases of laparoscopic esophageal hiatal hernia repair were successful. The operation time was 110 (70~190) min, blood loss 10~50 h mL; after operation 24 h~48 h fluid diet. There were no complications such as incision infection, postoperative massive hemorrhage, patch adverse reactions and so on. All patients were hospitalized for an average of 7~11 days and followed up for an average of 8.6 months. The health-related symptoms such as chest pain, acid regurgitation, belching and asthma were significantly improved in most patients. There was significant difference in Gerd Q score between pre-operation and post-operation.

Conclusion

laparoscopic esophageal hiatal herniorrhaphy is a feasible method with satisfactory results, it has the advantages of faster recovery, less trauma and less postoperative complications, so it is worth further popularizing and applying in clinic.

图1 游离组织后可见部分胃组织通过食管裂孔进入胸腔 图2 食管裂孔疝用圆针 7 号丝线缝合膈肌脚
图3 用专用补片修补、加固食管裂孔 图4 术中采取胃底折叠,以达到抗反流目的
表1 Gerd Q评分量表(分)
1
Kerut EK, Balart JT. "Diagnosis" of a hiatal hernia from a CT coronary artery calcium scan [J]. Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, NY), 2017, 34(10): 1515-1518.
2
Kahrilas PJ, Kim HC, Pandolfino JE. Approaches to the diagnosis and grading of hiatal hernia [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2008, 22(4):601-616.
3
Koetje JH, Oor JF, Roks DJ, et al. Equal patient satisfaction, quality of life and objective recurrence rate after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with and without mesh [J]. Surg Endosc,. 2017, 31(9):3673-3680.
4
Sandhu DS, Fass R. Current Trends in the Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. Gut liver, 2018, 12(1): 7-16.
5
Chowdhury SD, George G, Ramakrishna K, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease in southern India: a community-based study[J]. Indian J Gastroenterol, 2019, 38(1): 77-82.
6
Wijnhoven BP. Twenty years of experience with laparoscopic antireflux surgery (Br J Surg 2012; 99: 1415-1421) [J]. Br J Surg, 2012, 99(10): 1422.
7
Niaz SK, Quraishy MS, Taj MA, et al. Guidelines on gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2015, 65(5): 532-541.
8
Iwakiri K, Kinoshita Y, Habu Y, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2015 [J]. J Gastroenterol, 2016, 51(8): 751-767.
9
Vaezi MF, Yang YX, Howden CW. Complications of proton pump inhibitor therapy [J]. Gastroenterology, 2017, 153(1): 35-48.
10
Grant AM, Boachie C, Cotton SC, et al. Clinical and economic evaluation of laparoscopic surgery compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: 5-year follow-up of multicentre randomised trial (the REFLUX trial) [J]. Health Technol Assess, 2013, 17(22): 1-167.
11
Stefanidis D, Hope WW, Kohn GP, et al. Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(11): 2647-2669.
12
Yates RB, Oelschlager BK. Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2015, 95(3):527-553.
13
Lee TG, ,Lee IS, Kim BS, et al. Surgical outcomes and over one-year follow-up results of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Single-center experiences [J]. Asian J Surg, 2019, 42(4):557-562.
14
Nam SY, Park BJ,Cho YA, et al. Different effects of dietary factors on reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease in 11, 690 Korean subjects [J]. J Gastroenterol, 2017, 52(7):818-829.
15
Yun JS, Na KJ,Song SY, et al. Laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia [J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(9): 3903-3908.
[1] 张华, 孙宇, 乡世健, 李樱媚, 王小群. 循环肿瘤细胞预测晚期胃肠癌患者化疗药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 422-425.
[2] 李世红, 侯康. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝补片修补术联合胃底折叠术(Nissen)[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 365-365.
[3] 贾卓奇, 周维茹, 张勇, 张广健, 付军科. 达·芬奇机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的对比研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 410-414.
[4] 孙亚莉, 袁泼棉, 同欢庆, 吴娜, 马亚婷, 韩瑞. 基于微信平台的延续护理对腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术患者的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 481-484.
[5] 中国医师协会妇产科医师分会妇科单孔腹腔镜全国科研协作组. 妇科单孔腹腔镜手术镜下联合体外操作模式临床应用专家共识[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 200-209.
[6] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[7] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[8] 孙秀艳, 徐庆蕾, 马鹏涛, 胡志元, 郭传真, 祝成红. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术中患者体温变化与压力性损伤及受压部位微环境的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 480-484.
[9] 张景旭, 李德舫, 由上可, 张玉田. 贝伐珠单抗与安罗替尼联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期直肠癌的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 289-293.
[10] 盛静, 梅勇, 夏佩, 王晓林. 乌苯美司联合伊立替康二线治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 317-321.
[11] 于晓东, 李德华, 高山, 徐鑫. 理中汤加味联合美沙拉嗪治疗轻度活动期克罗恩病的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 199-202.
[12] 董骏, 吴芳芳. mFOLFOX6与FOLFOX4化疗方案治疗直肠癌的临床疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 236-240.
[13] 赵军, 李超杰, 李佳. 雷贝拉唑联合康复新液对治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性的十二指肠溃疡的疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 254-258.
[14] 李莹倩, 李华山. 基于真实世界的完全性直肠脱垂治疗方式评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 700-705.
[15] 马洪庆, 于淼, 张建锋, 武雪亮, 胡旭华, 王光林, 孟泽松, 于滨, 王贵英. 混合入路与传统中央入路在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中的疗效分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 545-550.
阅读次数
全文


摘要