切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (02) : 81 -84. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2021.02.007

论著

哮喘患者吞咽相关性咳嗽及酸反流特征分析
阿里木·买买提1, 陶发明1, 吴朝阳1, 祖里培亚·艾拜都拉2, 克力木·阿不都热依木3,()   
  1. 1. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院急诊创伤外科
    2. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院呼吸与危重症医学中心
    3. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创、疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-20 出版日期:2021-05-15
  • 通信作者: 克力木·阿不都热依木
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(2021D01C148)

Analysis of the characteristics of swallowing related cough and acid reflux in asthma patients

Alimu·Maimaiti1, Faming Tao1, Zhaoyang Wu1, Zulipeiya·Aibaidoula2, Kelimu·Abudureyimu3,()   

  1. 1. Derartment of Emergency and Traumatic Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830001, China
    2. Department of Respiratory Medicine, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830001, China
    3. Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830001, China
  • Received:2020-10-20 Published:2021-05-15
  • Corresponding author: Kelimu·Abudureyimu
引用本文:

阿里木·买买提, 陶发明, 吴朝阳, 祖里培亚·艾拜都拉, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 哮喘患者吞咽相关性咳嗽及酸反流特征分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2021, 08(02): 81-84.

Alimu·Maimaiti, Faming Tao, Zhaoyang Wu, Zulipeiya·Aibaidoula, Kelimu·Abudureyimu. Analysis of the characteristics of swallowing related cough and acid reflux in asthma patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2021, 08(02): 81-84.

目的

探讨哮喘患者吞咽相关性咳嗽(SRC)的患病率及其特征。

方法

选取2017年8月至2019年11月新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院就诊的哮喘患者94例,并进行哮喘问卷调查,分析其是否曾患有SRC以及与其相关的鼻后滴漏,烧心,咳嗽和酸反流。

结果

共纳入94例支气管哮喘患者,其中SRC阳性患者为48例(51.1%)和SRC阴性患者为46例(48.9%);SRC阳性患者致咳嗽的主要食物为辛辣(33.3%)和酸味(43.8%);食管24 h pH监测结果显示,SRC阳性患者食管近端弱酸反流明显高于SRC阴性患者(P<0.05);在SRC阳性组中,鼻后滴漏和烧心引起的咳嗽频率均明显高于SRC阴性组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

SRC在哮喘患者中常见,与鼻后滴漏,烧心及酸反流发生密切相关。

Objective

To investigate the prevalence and characteristics of swallowing related cough (SRC) in asthma patients.

Methods

A total of 94 asthmatic patients from August 2017 to November 2019 whom diagnosed with asthma in our hospital were selected as the study group, and asthma questionnaire survey was conducted to analyze whether they had SRC, as well as the related postnasal drip, heartburn, cough and acid reflux.

Results

The patients were divided two groups, 48 patients with SRC positive (51.1%) and 46 patients with SRC negative (48.9%); the main foods that causing cough in patients with SRC positive was spicy (33.3%) and sour (43.8%); the 24 hour pH monitoring showed that the weak acid reflux (%) in the proximal part of esophagus in patients with SRC positive was significantly higher than SRC negative group (P<0.05); the frequency of cough caused by postnasal drip and heartburn was significantly higher than SRC negative group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

SRC is common in asthmatic patients, which is closely related to postnasal drip, heartburn and acid reflux.

表1 患者一般临床特点
表2 SRC(+)患者与食物性质的关系[例(%)]
表3 2组患者食管动力学指标比较(
xˉ
±s
表4 SRC与鼻后滴流和烧心之间的关系[例(%)]
1
Eid RC, Wudneh E, Zahid S, et al. Poor control of asthma symptoms with interleukin-5 inhibitors in four patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease [J].Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 2020, 124(1): 102-104.
2
Roland LT, Wang H, Mehta CC, et al. Longitudinal progression of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease: analysis of a national insurance claims database [J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2019, 9(12): 1420-1423.
3
Sethi S, Richter JE. Diet and gastroesophageal reflux disease: role in pathogenesis and management [J]. Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 2017,33(2):107-111.
4
Bucher S, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Soyka MB. Altered viscosity of nasal secretions in postnasal drip [J]. Chest, 2019, 56(4): 659-666.
5
克力木·阿不都热依木, 张成, 汪忠镐.胃食管反流病与食管裂孔疝外科临床研究现状与争议 [J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2014, 1(1): 4-6.
6
Niimi A, Fukumitsu K, Takeda N, et al. Interfering with airway nerves in cough associated with asthma [J]. Pulm Pharmacol Ther, 2019, 59:101854.
7
Tao M, Liu Q, Miyazaki Y, et al. Nicotinic receptor dependent regulation of cough and other airway defensive reflexes [J]. Pulm Pharmacol Ther, 2019, 58:101810.
8
Dinh QT, Heck S, Le DD, et al. Pathophysiology, diagnostics and therapy of chronic cough: neuronal reflexes and antitussiva [J].Pneumologie, 2013, 67(6): 327-34.
9
Cinelli E, Iovino L, Bongianni F, et al. Inhibitory modulation of the cough reflex by acetylcholine in the caudal nucleus tractus solitarii of the rabbit [J]. Respir Physiol Neurobiol, 2018, 257: 93-99.
10
万文娟, 张建斌, 王晓云, 等. 二氧化硅刺激小鼠肺成纤维细胞对Toll样受体2表达的影响 [J]. 长治医学院学报, 2019, 33(2):85-88.
11
冉博文, 杨铭心, 候飞飞, 等. 咳嗽变异性哮喘患者肺通气功能与气道反应性分析 [J]. 国际呼吸杂志, 2019, 39(7):495-499.
12
Patel DA, Blanco M, Vaezi MF. Laryngopharyngeal reflux and functional laryngeal disorder: perspective and common practice of the general gastroenterologist [J]. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y), 2018,14(9): 512-520.
13
Ryan NM, Vertigan AE, Birring SS . An update and systematic review on drug therapies for the treatment of refractory chronic cough [J]. Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2018, 19(7): 687-711.
14
Duricek M, Banovcin P, Halickova T, et al. Acidic pharyngeal reflux does not correlate with symptoms and laryngeal injury attributed to laryngopharyngeal reflux [J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2019, 64(5): 1270-1280.
15
涂蕾, 陈建德. 胃食管反流病的非药物治疗现状与新进展 [J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2019, 6(2):92-96.
16
Kamimura M, Mouri A, Takayama K, et al. Cough related to swallowing in asthma patients [J]. Asia Pac Allergy, 2019, 9(4): e31.
17
Horwitz Berkun R, Polak D, Shapira L, et al. Association of dental and maxillary sinus pathologies with ear, nose, and throat symptoms [J].Oral Dis 2018, 24(4): 650-656.
18
张宏雨, 黄娟, 赵立焕, 等. 变应性咳嗽患者214例血清变应原特异性IgE检测结果分析 [J]. 山西医药杂志, 2018(8):942-943.
19
Prasad S, Fong E, Ooi EH. Systematic review of patient-reported outcomes after revision endoscopic sinus surgery [J].Am J Rhinol Allergy, 2017, 31(4): 248-255.
20
Macedo P, Zhang Q, Saito J, et al. Analysis of bronchial biopsies in chronic cough [J]. Respir Med, 2017, 127:40-44.
[1] 陈腊青, 林佳佳, 毛洪刚, 童冠海, 汪梦娜, 夏红波, 刘卓, 徐海霞, 赵玉华, 张传领. 血清细胞因子及呼出气一氧化氮在哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠综合征中的临床意义[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 316-320.
[2] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[3] 娄丽丽, 刘瀚旻. 儿童哮喘易感基因及表观遗传学研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 249-255.
[4] 鄢锦丽, 陈大鹏. 益生菌在新生儿呼吸系统疾病临床治疗中的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(05): 517-522.
[5] 刘佳铭, 孙晓容, 文健, 何晓丽, 任茂玲. 有氧运动对成人哮喘肺功能、生活质量以及哮喘控制影响的Meta分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 592-595.
[6] 张荷连, 刘禹, 李丹妮, 彭茹, 杨彩蝶, 窦恒, 吴红梅. 心理障碍对重度哮喘患者的疾病控制及生活工作质量的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 589-591.
[7] 谭玲芳, 周克兵. 基于生物信息学整合鉴定与支气管哮喘相关的潜在诊断生物标志物[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 329-334.
[8] 路东明, 陈建华, 艾月琴. 布地格福吸入气雾剂治疗支气管哮喘的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 361-363.
[9] 刘汶睿, 高丽娜, 于书娴, 周建刚. 支气管哮喘患者血清IL-27与IFN-γ及肺功能相关性分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 224-226.
[10] 刘娜, 赵然然. 支气管哮喘微量元素水平与免疫功能的相关性分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 74-76.
[11] 李德莲, 杨鹏, 王琳. FeNO联合总IgE、CXCL13检测对儿童支气管炎继发哮喘的意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 838-840.
[12] 严瑾, 王继鹏. 肺泡气一氧化氮对咳嗽变异性哮喘ICS+LABA治疗反应的意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(05): 673-675.
[13] 刘婷婷, 肖田恬, 周颖. 多索茶碱治疗不同FeNO水平ACO患者的疗效及表观调控意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 524-526.
[14] 夏金根, 胡诗雨. 体外二氧化碳清除技术的重症应用场景[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 40-45.
[15] 阿孜古丽·阿力木江, 买买提·依斯热依力, 王婧, 阿巴伯克力·乌斯曼, 陈美华, 陆萍, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 探讨围绝经期妇女胃食管反流病症状和胃酸反流的特征[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2022, 09(03): 151-155.
阅读次数
全文


摘要