切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (04) : 189 -192. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2021.04.007

综述

机器人辅助腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术的应用进展
麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明1, 克力木·阿不都热依木1   
  1. 1. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-02 出版日期:2021-11-15

Application progress of robot-assisted laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair

Maimaitiaili·Maimaitiming1, Kelimu·Abdureyimu1   

  1. 1. Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, 83001, China
  • Received:2021-10-02 Published:2021-11-15
引用本文:

麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人辅助腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术的应用进展[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2021, 08(04): 189-192.

Maimaitiaili·Maimaitiming, Kelimu·Abdureyimu. Application progress of robot-assisted laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2021, 08(04): 189-192.

食管裂孔疝(HH)是一种影响着多达60%的成年人口的常见疾病,高龄和超重是HH发生的主要危险因素。近年来,HH的发生率有增加趋势,因此防治变得至关重要。腹腔镜下HH修补术是目前治疗有症状的HH的主要方式。但是传统腹腔镜技术具有视野受限、器械运动受限、二维成像以及外科医师学习曲线长等缺点。近年来,机器人手术平台克服了传统腹腔镜手术相关的一些技术限制,在HH修补中的使用有所增加。机器人辅助腹腔镜下HH修补术能够减少转换为开放手术的需要,缩短患者住院时间,降低术后并发症发生率,精细解剖和缝合,初始学习曲线短。此外,机器人辅助可能有利于HH修补和抗反流手术后的再次手术,有望成为复发性HH的首选术式。本文中笔者对机器人辅助腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术的应用进展进行综述,旨在为其临床应用推广提供参考。

Hiatal hernia (hiatal hernia, HH) is a common disease that affects up to 60% of the adult population. Old age and overweight are the main risk factors for HH. In recent years, as the number of overweight people has increased and the phenomenon of aging has become more and more prominent, the prevention and treatment of HH has become crucial. Laparoscopic HH repair is the main way to treat symptomatic HH. However, traditional laparoscopic techniques have the disadvantages of limited field of view, limited movement of instruments, 2-dimensional view, slow learning curve for surgeons and so on. In recent years, the use of robotic surgery platforms in HH repair has increased because it can overcome some of the technical limitations associated with traditional laparoscopic surgery. Robot-assisted laparoscopic HH repair has the following potential advantages: it can reduce the need to switch to open surgery; it can shorten the patient's hospital stay; it has lower postoperative complications;It has advantages in fine anatomy and suture;and The initial learning curve appears relatively short for experienced minimally invasive esophageal surgeon. In addition, robot assistance may be beneficial for Redo hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery, and is expected to become the first choice for recurrent HH. This article reviews the clinical application and progress of robot-assisted laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.

1
Dean C, Etienne D, Carpentier B. et al. Hiatal hernias[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2012, 34, 291–299.
2
Menon S, Trudgill N. Risk factors in the aetiology of hiatus hernia: a meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2011, 23:133-138.
3
李赞林, 张成, 克力木, 等. 腹腔镜胃底前180°折叠术治疗胃食管反流病疗效分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2015, 20(2):93-96.
4
Roman S, Kahrilas PJ. The diagnosis and management of hiatus hernia[J]. BMJ, 2014, 349:g6154.
5
Yu HX, Han CS, Xue JR, Han ZF, Xin H. Esophageal hiatal hernia: risk, diagnosis and management[J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 12(4):319-329.
6
Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Nathanson LK. Laparoscopic reduction, crural repair, and fundoplication of large hiatal hernia[J]. Am J Surg, 1992, 163(4):425-430.
7
Catarci M, Gentileschi P, Papi C, et al. Evidence-based appraisal of antireflux fundoplication[J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 239(3):325-337.
8
Peters JH. SAGES guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(12):4407-4408.
9
Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, et al. 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility[J]. Ann Surg, 2013, 258(4):554-559.
10
Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kwon YJ, et al. Robot versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer by an experienced surgeon: comparisons of surgery, complications, and surgical stress[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013, 20(4):1258-1265.
11
Broeders IA. Robotics: The next step? [J] Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2014, 28(1):225-232.
12
Kahrilas PJ, Kim HC, Pandolfino JE. Approaches to the diagnosis and grading of hiatal hernia[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2008, 22(4):601-616.
13
Watson TJ, Moritz T. Sliding Hernia[M]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2021: 29083633.
14
Allemann P, Guarnero V, Schoepfer A, et al. [Hiatal hernia : current diagnostic and therapeutic management] [J]. Rev Med Suisse, 2017, 13(567):1248-1252.
15
Tartaglia N, Pavone G, Di Lascia A, et al. Robotic voluminous paraesophageal hernia repair: a case report and review of the literature[J]. J Med Case Rep, 2020, 14(1):25.
16
Nguyen NT, Christie C, Masoomi H, et al. Utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open paraesophageal hernia repair[J]. Am Surg, 2011, 77(10):1353-1357.
17
Ballantyne GH. The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2002, 12(1):1-5.
18
Tolboom RC, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA. Evaluation of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic redo hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery: a cohort study[J]. J Robot Surg, 2016, 10(1):33-39.
19
Sarkaria IS, Latif MJ, Bianco VJ, et al. Early operative outcomes and learning curve of robotic assisted giant paraesophageal hernia repair[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2017, 13(1): 1730.
20
Gehrig T., Mehrabi A., Fischer L. et al. Robotic-assisted paraesophageal hernia repair-a case-control study[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2013, 398: 691-696.
21
Soliman BG, Nguyen DT, Chan EY, et al. Robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair demonstrates favorable short-term outcomes compared to laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34, 2495-2502.
22
Gerull WD, Cho D, Arefanian S, et al. Favorable peri-operative outcomes observed in paraesophageal hernia repair with robotic approach[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35: 3085–3089.
23
Zhou T, Harnsberger C, Broderick R, et al. Reoperation rates after laparoscopic fundoplication[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(3):510-514.
24
Furnée EJ, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA, et al. Surgical reintervention after failed antireflux surgery: a systematic review of the literature[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2009, 13(8):1539-1549.
25
Sowards KJ, Holton NF, Elliott EG, et al. Safety of robotic assisted laparoscopic recurrent paraesophageal hernia repair: insights from a large single institution experience[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34, 2560-2566.
26
Tolboom RC, Broeders IA, Draaisma WA. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2015, 112(3):266-270.
[1] 庞嘉越成, 巨淑慧, 马冀青, 李恒宇, 盛湲. 乳腺癌易感基因突变人群接受降低乳腺癌风险手术的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 179-183.
[2] 刘伦, 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 韩鹏飞, 张鹏, 李晓东. 机器人辅助膝关节单髁置换术的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 715-721.
[3] 李世红, 侯康. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝补片修补术联合胃底折叠术(Nissen)[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 365-365.
[4] 古丽米拉·亚森江, 阿依努尔·艾尔肯, 李佳隆, 郭强, 蒋铁民, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉. 胆囊切除术后胆管损伤不同治疗方式的疗效分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 262-266.
[5] 罗佳, 赵晶晶, 曹小珍, 钟玲, 范林军, 曾令娟. 单侧腋窝双侧乳晕入路机器人甲状腺术后局部加压预防皮下隧道出血的对照研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 603-606.
[6] 孟令展, 朱震宇. 达芬奇机器人辅助肝中叶切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 373-373.
[7] 谢秋波, 周宇, 宋健, 涂忠, 李想, 汪仁昊, 伍依依, 潘铁军. 全息影像在机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术中保留膀胱颈的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 209-213.
[8] 贾卓奇, 周维茹, 张勇, 张广健, 付军科. 达·芬奇机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的对比研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 410-414.
[9] 孙亚莉, 袁泼棉, 同欢庆, 吴娜, 马亚婷, 韩瑞. 基于微信平台的延续护理对腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术患者的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 481-484.
[10] 夏玥, 向承红. 马镫型体位架在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术患者的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 485-487.
[11] 朱伟权, 叶善平, 唐和春, 刘东宁, 鞠后琼, 仲崇晗, 黄智翔, 李太原. 机器人辅助直肠癌NOSES术后细菌学及肿瘤学结果的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 282-287.
[12] 钟东. 大脑凸面脑膜瘤的个体化全程管理[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 193-198.
[13] 廖环, 徐蛟天, 张海涛, 邱光庭, 蒋成昊, 陈进, 邹景芳, 张志文. 颈椎管内外节细胞神经瘤一例报道及文献复习[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 186-189.
[14] 刘家伦, 郑占乐. 跟骨载距突解剖与临床应用现状[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 188-192.
[15] 马四海, 杨剑, 马显武, 张敏, 吕明礼, 李启菊, 杨轶声, 刘海生. Shamblin Ⅱ型颈动脉体瘤的诊疗及文献综述[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 467-470.
阅读次数
全文


摘要