切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (04) : 189 -192. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2021.04.007

综述

机器人辅助腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术的应用进展
麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明1, 克力木·阿不都热依木1   
  1. 1. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-02 出版日期:2021-11-15

Application progress of robot-assisted laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair

Maimaitiaili·Maimaitiming1, Kelimu·Abdureyimu1   

  1. 1. Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, 83001, China
  • Received:2021-10-02 Published:2021-11-15
引用本文:

麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人辅助腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2021, 08(04): 189-192.

Maimaitiaili·Maimaitiming, Kelimu·Abdureyimu. Application progress of robot-assisted laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2021, 08(04): 189-192.

食管裂孔疝(HH)是一种影响着多达60%的成年人口的常见疾病,高龄和超重是HH发生的主要危险因素。近年来,HH的发生率有增加趋势,因此防治变得至关重要。腹腔镜下HH修补术是目前治疗有症状的HH的主要方式。但是传统腹腔镜技术具有视野受限、器械运动受限、二维成像以及外科医师学习曲线长等缺点。近年来,机器人手术平台克服了传统腹腔镜手术相关的一些技术限制,在HH修补中的使用有所增加。机器人辅助腹腔镜下HH修补术能够减少转换为开放手术的需要,缩短患者住院时间,降低术后并发症发生率,精细解剖和缝合,初始学习曲线短。此外,机器人辅助可能有利于HH修补和抗反流手术后的再次手术,有望成为复发性HH的首选术式。本文中笔者对机器人辅助腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术的应用进展进行综述,旨在为其临床应用推广提供参考。

Hiatal hernia (hiatal hernia, HH) is a common disease that affects up to 60% of the adult population. Old age and overweight are the main risk factors for HH. In recent years, as the number of overweight people has increased and the phenomenon of aging has become more and more prominent, the prevention and treatment of HH has become crucial. Laparoscopic HH repair is the main way to treat symptomatic HH. However, traditional laparoscopic techniques have the disadvantages of limited field of view, limited movement of instruments, 2-dimensional view, slow learning curve for surgeons and so on. In recent years, the use of robotic surgery platforms in HH repair has increased because it can overcome some of the technical limitations associated with traditional laparoscopic surgery. Robot-assisted laparoscopic HH repair has the following potential advantages: it can reduce the need to switch to open surgery; it can shorten the patient's hospital stay; it has lower postoperative complications;It has advantages in fine anatomy and suture;and The initial learning curve appears relatively short for experienced minimally invasive esophageal surgeon. In addition, robot assistance may be beneficial for Redo hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery, and is expected to become the first choice for recurrent HH. This article reviews the clinical application and progress of robot-assisted laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.

1
Dean C, Etienne D, Carpentier B. et al. Hiatal hernias[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2012, 34, 291–299.
2
Menon S, Trudgill N. Risk factors in the aetiology of hiatus hernia: a meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2011, 23:133-138.
3
李赞林, 张成, 克力木, 等. 腹腔镜胃底前180°折叠术治疗胃食管反流病疗效分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2015, 20(2):93-96.
4
Roman S, Kahrilas PJ. The diagnosis and management of hiatus hernia[J]. BMJ, 2014, 349:g6154.
5
Yu HX, Han CS, Xue JR, Han ZF, Xin H. Esophageal hiatal hernia: risk, diagnosis and management[J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 12(4):319-329.
6
Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Nathanson LK. Laparoscopic reduction, crural repair, and fundoplication of large hiatal hernia[J]. Am J Surg, 1992, 163(4):425-430.
7
Catarci M, Gentileschi P, Papi C, et al. Evidence-based appraisal of antireflux fundoplication[J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 239(3):325-337.
8
Peters JH. SAGES guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(12):4407-4408.
9
Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, et al. 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility[J]. Ann Surg, 2013, 258(4):554-559.
10
Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kwon YJ, et al. Robot versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer by an experienced surgeon: comparisons of surgery, complications, and surgical stress[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013, 20(4):1258-1265.
11
Broeders IA. Robotics: The next step? [J] Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2014, 28(1):225-232.
12
Kahrilas PJ, Kim HC, Pandolfino JE. Approaches to the diagnosis and grading of hiatal hernia[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2008, 22(4):601-616.
13
Watson TJ, Moritz T. Sliding Hernia[M]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2021: 29083633.
14
Allemann P, Guarnero V, Schoepfer A, et al. [Hiatal hernia : current diagnostic and therapeutic management] [J]. Rev Med Suisse, 2017, 13(567):1248-1252.
15
Tartaglia N, Pavone G, Di Lascia A, et al. Robotic voluminous paraesophageal hernia repair: a case report and review of the literature[J]. J Med Case Rep, 2020, 14(1):25.
16
Nguyen NT, Christie C, Masoomi H, et al. Utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open paraesophageal hernia repair[J]. Am Surg, 2011, 77(10):1353-1357.
17
Ballantyne GH. The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2002, 12(1):1-5.
18
Tolboom RC, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA. Evaluation of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic redo hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery: a cohort study[J]. J Robot Surg, 2016, 10(1):33-39.
19
Sarkaria IS, Latif MJ, Bianco VJ, et al. Early operative outcomes and learning curve of robotic assisted giant paraesophageal hernia repair[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2017, 13(1): 1730.
20
Gehrig T., Mehrabi A., Fischer L. et al. Robotic-assisted paraesophageal hernia repair-a case-control study[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2013, 398: 691-696.
21
Soliman BG, Nguyen DT, Chan EY, et al. Robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair demonstrates favorable short-term outcomes compared to laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34, 2495-2502.
22
Gerull WD, Cho D, Arefanian S, et al. Favorable peri-operative outcomes observed in paraesophageal hernia repair with robotic approach[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35: 3085–3089.
23
Zhou T, Harnsberger C, Broderick R, et al. Reoperation rates after laparoscopic fundoplication[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(3):510-514.
24
Furnée EJ, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA, et al. Surgical reintervention after failed antireflux surgery: a systematic review of the literature[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2009, 13(8):1539-1549.
25
Sowards KJ, Holton NF, Elliott EG, et al. Safety of robotic assisted laparoscopic recurrent paraesophageal hernia repair: insights from a large single institution experience[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34, 2560-2566.
26
Tolboom RC, Broeders IA, Draaisma WA. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2015, 112(3):266-270.
[1] 丁莹莹, 宋恺, 金姬延, 田华. 机器人辅助膝髋关节置换术后精细化临床护理[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 553-557.
[2] 任俊筱, 浦路桥, 王志豪, 施洪鑫, 刘爱峰, 齐保闯, 徐永清, 李川. 机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的临床疗效对照研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 469-476.
[3] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[4] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[5] 刘连新, 孟凡征. 不断提高腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的规范化[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 355-358.
[6] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[7] 仝聪, 周哲琦, 阎立昆. 食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病治疗现状及与胃食管结合部肿瘤的关系[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 491-493.
[8] 蒋凤茹, 朱熠林. 双腔造瘘口旁疝诊疗经验[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 534-537.
[9] 孙昭, 刘琪, 王殿琛, 姜建武, 符洋. 机器人对比腹腔镜及开放式腹股沟疝修补术的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 588-598.
[10] 刘明昊, 李晨, 王冰, 万政, 田文. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术对比研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 376-382.
[11] 魏孔源, 仵正, 王铮, 黎韡. 机器人胰腺中段切除后远端胰腺消化道不同重建方式初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 295-300.
[12] 翁桂湖, 刘悦泽, 张太平. 胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤治疗进展与争议[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 602-606.
[13] 邱小原, 刘雨馨, 李珂璇, 林国乐, 邱辉忠, 安燚. 直肠肿瘤术后直肠阴道瘘的外科治疗[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 423-430.
[14] 曹文钰, 郭鹏, 李锦平. 微创手术及非手术方式治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 304-309.
[15] 李晓东, 李昂, 马龙, 刘亮, 魏云, 王汉宇. 基底动脉顶端动脉瘤显微手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 254-256.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?