切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (01) : 30 -34. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2022.01.006

论著

手术直播演示结合分级腹腔镜模拟器训练法在普外科腹腔镜培训中的研究
于淼1, 路夷平1,()   
  1. 1. 100010 北京,首都医科大学附属北京中医医院大外科及肿瘤外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-18 出版日期:2022-02-15
  • 通信作者: 路夷平
  • 基金资助:
    首都医科大学教育教学改革研究课题

Study on the combination of live operation demonstration and graded laparoscopic simulator training in general surgery laparoscopic training

Miao Yu1, Yiping Lu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Oncology Surgery,Capital University of Medical Sciences affiliated Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese medicine,Beijing 100010,China.
  • Received:2021-12-18 Published:2022-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Yiping Lu
引用本文:

于淼, 路夷平. 手术直播演示结合分级腹腔镜模拟器训练法在普外科腹腔镜培训中的研究[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2022, 09(01): 30-34.

Miao Yu, Yiping Lu. Study on the combination of live operation demonstration and graded laparoscopic simulator training in general surgery laparoscopic training[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2022, 09(01): 30-34.

目的

手术直播演示结合分级腹腔镜模拟器训练法在普外科腹腔镜培训中的应用效果。

方法

首都医科大学附属北京中医医院参加住院医师规范化培训基地第1阶段普外科、泌尿外科及妇科专业住院医师和本院纳入第1阶段住院医师规范化培训的普外科、泌尿外科及妇科专业研究生组成,共120名。腹腔镜基本技能培训为期1个月,内容包括3部分:手术直播演示每周2台;理论授课每周2次,每次1 h;模拟训练4周,操作每天4 h,包括(初级模块——基本技能训练;中级模块——简单及高级缝合训练;进阶模块——腹腔镜必要技巧训练;高级模块——模拟手术培训)。随机分为3组,其中试验组采用手术演示+理论授课+腹腔镜模拟训练;对照组采用理论授课+手术演示;空白组采用仅进行理论授课,不参与其他培训,安排下一期参加培训。

结果

培训后腹腔镜理论考核成绩试验组为(82.00±6.72)分,对照组为(83.40±6.51)分,空白组(83.20±5.72)分,均较培训前提高,但差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),且3组间培训前后理论成绩差异不显著,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腹腔镜操作技能考核成绩试验组培训后初级模块——基本技能训练、中级模块——简单及高级缝合训练、进阶模块——腹腔镜必要技巧训练、高级模块——模拟手术培训各项操作技能成绩分别为(86.00±5.98)、(86.00±5.98)、(85.00±5.13)和(82.50±6.38)分,较试验组培训前的(37.00±10.81)、(18.00±7.68)、(16.00±8.21)和(10.50±10.50)分显著提高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);明显高于对照组(46.00±9.95)、(44.00±9.40)、(39.00±7.18)和(35.00±7.18)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);明显高于空白组(36.00±8.21)、(18.50±6.71)、(16.50±9.44)和(11.00±9.68)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜技能模拟训练能有效提高临床医学生的腹腔镜操作技能。

Objective

To evaluate the application of live operation demonstration combined with graded laparoscopic simulator training in general surgery.

Methods

The Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine affiliated to Capital Medical University was composed of 120 general surgery, urology and gynecology major residents who participated in the first phase of standardized training base for residents, and 120 general surgery, urology and gynecology major graduate students who were included in the first phase of standardized training for residents. Laparoscopic basic skills training lasts for one month, including three parts: 2 live surgical demonstrations per week; Theoretical teaching is conducted twice a week for 1h each time; Simulated training lasts for 4 weeks, and the operation lasts for 4 hours every day, including (primary module basic skills training; intermediate module simple and advanced suture training; advanced module necessary laparoscopic skills training; advanced module simulated surgery training). They were randomly divided into three groups, in which the experimental group received surgical demonstration+theoretical teaching+laparoscopic simulation training; The control group was given theoretical teaching+surgical demonstration; The blank group only conducts theoretical teaching, does not participate in other trainings, and arranges to participate in the next training.

Results

The theoretical examination scores of laparoscope after training were (82.00 6.72) points in the test group, (83.40 6.51) points in the control group, and (83.20 5.72) points in the blank group, all of which were higher than those before training, but the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05), and there was no significant difference between the three groups before and after training, and the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Laparoscopic operation skill assessment results After the training of the test group, the scores of each operation skill of the primary module - basic skill training, intermediate module-simple and advanced suture training, advanced module - laparoscopic necessary skill training, advanced module - simulated surgery training were (86.00 5.98), (86.00 5.98), (85.00 5.13) and (82.50 6.38) respectively, which were higher than those of the test group before the training (37.00 10.81), (18.00 7.68) The scores of (16.00 8.21) and (10.50 10.50) were significantly improved, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); The scores in the control group were significantly higher than those in the control group (46.00 9.95), (44.00 9.40), (39.00 7.18) and (35.00 7.18) (P<0.05); It was significantly higher than the blank group (36.00 8.21), (18.50 6.71), (16.50 9.44) and (11.00 9.68), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic skill simulation training can effectively improve the laparoscopic operation skills of clinical medical students.

图1 LAP MENTOR腹腔镜手术虚拟教学训练系统
表1 试验组、对照组及空白组培训前后理论考核成绩比较(分,
xˉ
±s
表2 试验组、对照组、空白组操作技能考核成绩对比
1
金石华, 张弋, 孙国锋, 等. 腹腔镜模拟训练对不同经验医师腹腔镜手术基本技能训练的效果[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2014, 20(1):34-37.
2
张秋菊. 医学生临床实习存在的问题及对策[J]. 西北医学教育,2015, 23(2): 389-391.
3
曾学军. 医院教学[M]. 北京: 中国协和医科大学出版社, 2014: 40-42.
4
Holznecht C, Schmidt T, Gould J. The impact of training under different visualspatial conditions on reverse alignment laparoscopic skills development[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(1): 120-123.
5
黄飞, 蔡小勇. 腹腔镜初学者如何缩短学习曲线[J]. 微创医学, 2012, 7(2): 194-196.
6
徐林. 腹腔镜虚拟模拟机在腹腔镜技能培训中的作用分析[J]. 中国当代医药, 2015, 22(36): 132-136.
7
路夷平. 完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术学习曲线分析[J].继续医学教育, 2016(8):14-16.
[1] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[2] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[11] 马涛, 叶春伟, 刘滔, 彭文希, 李志鹏. 腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
[12] 刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰. EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.
[13] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[14] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[15] 孙秀艳, 徐庆蕾, 马鹏涛, 胡志元, 郭传真, 祝成红. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术中患者体温变化与压力性损伤及受压部位微环境的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 480-484.
阅读次数
全文


摘要