切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (01) : 30 -34. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2022.01.006

论著

手术直播演示结合分级腹腔镜模拟器训练法在普外科腹腔镜培训中的研究
于淼1, 路夷平1,()   
  1. 1. 100010 北京,首都医科大学附属北京中医医院大外科及肿瘤外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-18 出版日期:2022-02-15
  • 通信作者: 路夷平
  • 基金资助:
    首都医科大学教育教学改革研究课题

Study on the combination of live operation demonstration and graded laparoscopic simulator training in general surgery laparoscopic training

Miao Yu1, Yiping Lu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Oncology Surgery,Capital University of Medical Sciences affiliated Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese medicine,Beijing 100010,China.
  • Received:2021-12-18 Published:2022-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Yiping Lu
引用本文:

于淼, 路夷平. 手术直播演示结合分级腹腔镜模拟器训练法在普外科腹腔镜培训中的研究[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2022, 09(01): 30-34.

Miao Yu, Yiping Lu. Study on the combination of live operation demonstration and graded laparoscopic simulator training in general surgery laparoscopic training[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2022, 09(01): 30-34.

目的

手术直播演示结合分级腹腔镜模拟器训练法在普外科腹腔镜培训中的应用效果。

方法

首都医科大学附属北京中医医院参加住院医师规范化培训基地第1阶段普外科、泌尿外科及妇科专业住院医师和本院纳入第1阶段住院医师规范化培训的普外科、泌尿外科及妇科专业研究生组成,共120名。腹腔镜基本技能培训为期1个月,内容包括3部分:手术直播演示每周2台;理论授课每周2次,每次1 h;模拟训练4周,操作每天4 h,包括(初级模块——基本技能训练;中级模块——简单及高级缝合训练;进阶模块——腹腔镜必要技巧训练;高级模块——模拟手术培训)。随机分为3组,其中试验组采用手术演示+理论授课+腹腔镜模拟训练;对照组采用理论授课+手术演示;空白组采用仅进行理论授课,不参与其他培训,安排下一期参加培训。

结果

培训后腹腔镜理论考核成绩试验组为(82.00±6.72)分,对照组为(83.40±6.51)分,空白组(83.20±5.72)分,均较培训前提高,但差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),且3组间培训前后理论成绩差异不显著,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腹腔镜操作技能考核成绩试验组培训后初级模块——基本技能训练、中级模块——简单及高级缝合训练、进阶模块——腹腔镜必要技巧训练、高级模块——模拟手术培训各项操作技能成绩分别为(86.00±5.98)、(86.00±5.98)、(85.00±5.13)和(82.50±6.38)分,较试验组培训前的(37.00±10.81)、(18.00±7.68)、(16.00±8.21)和(10.50±10.50)分显著提高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);明显高于对照组(46.00±9.95)、(44.00±9.40)、(39.00±7.18)和(35.00±7.18)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);明显高于空白组(36.00±8.21)、(18.50±6.71)、(16.50±9.44)和(11.00±9.68)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜技能模拟训练能有效提高临床医学生的腹腔镜操作技能。

Objective

To evaluate the application of live operation demonstration combined with graded laparoscopic simulator training in general surgery.

Methods

The Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine affiliated to Capital Medical University was composed of 120 general surgery, urology and gynecology major residents who participated in the first phase of standardized training base for residents, and 120 general surgery, urology and gynecology major graduate students who were included in the first phase of standardized training for residents. Laparoscopic basic skills training lasts for one month, including three parts: 2 live surgical demonstrations per week; Theoretical teaching is conducted twice a week for 1h each time; Simulated training lasts for 4 weeks, and the operation lasts for 4 hours every day, including (primary module basic skills training; intermediate module simple and advanced suture training; advanced module necessary laparoscopic skills training; advanced module simulated surgery training). They were randomly divided into three groups, in which the experimental group received surgical demonstration+theoretical teaching+laparoscopic simulation training; The control group was given theoretical teaching+surgical demonstration; The blank group only conducts theoretical teaching, does not participate in other trainings, and arranges to participate in the next training.

Results

The theoretical examination scores of laparoscope after training were (82.00 6.72) points in the test group, (83.40 6.51) points in the control group, and (83.20 5.72) points in the blank group, all of which were higher than those before training, but the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05), and there was no significant difference between the three groups before and after training, and the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Laparoscopic operation skill assessment results After the training of the test group, the scores of each operation skill of the primary module - basic skill training, intermediate module-simple and advanced suture training, advanced module - laparoscopic necessary skill training, advanced module - simulated surgery training were (86.00 5.98), (86.00 5.98), (85.00 5.13) and (82.50 6.38) respectively, which were higher than those of the test group before the training (37.00 10.81), (18.00 7.68) The scores of (16.00 8.21) and (10.50 10.50) were significantly improved, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); The scores in the control group were significantly higher than those in the control group (46.00 9.95), (44.00 9.40), (39.00 7.18) and (35.00 7.18) (P<0.05); It was significantly higher than the blank group (36.00 8.21), (18.50 6.71), (16.50 9.44) and (11.00 9.68), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic skill simulation training can effectively improve the laparoscopic operation skills of clinical medical students.

图1 LAP MENTOR腹腔镜手术虚拟教学训练系统
表1 试验组、对照组及空白组培训前后理论考核成绩比较(分,
xˉ
±s
表2 试验组、对照组、空白组操作技能考核成绩对比
1
金石华, 张弋, 孙国锋, 等. 腹腔镜模拟训练对不同经验医师腹腔镜手术基本技能训练的效果[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2014, 20(1):34-37.
2
张秋菊. 医学生临床实习存在的问题及对策[J]. 西北医学教育,2015, 23(2): 389-391.
3
曾学军. 医院教学[M]. 北京: 中国协和医科大学出版社, 2014: 40-42.
4
Holznecht C, Schmidt T, Gould J. The impact of training under different visualspatial conditions on reverse alignment laparoscopic skills development[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(1): 120-123.
5
黄飞, 蔡小勇. 腹腔镜初学者如何缩短学习曲线[J]. 微创医学, 2012, 7(2): 194-196.
6
徐林. 腹腔镜虚拟模拟机在腹腔镜技能培训中的作用分析[J]. 中国当代医药, 2015, 22(36): 132-136.
7
路夷平. 完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术学习曲线分析[J].继续医学教育, 2016(8):14-16.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?