切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (04) : 176 -180. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2023.04.003

论著

生物补片在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中的应用
黄香港1, 赵怡欣1, 徐易敏1, 邵翔宇2, 程滔2, 嵇振岭2, 宋兴超3, 李俊生2,()   
  1. 1. 210009 南京,东南大学医学院
    2. 210009 南京,东南大学附属中大医院普外科
    3. 221116 徐州市第一人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-23 出版日期:2023-11-15
  • 通信作者: 李俊生
  • 基金资助:
    吴阶平医学基金会临床科研专项资助基金(320.6750.2022-07-01)

Clinical efficacy study of biological mesh application in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair

Xianggang Huang1, Yixin Zhao1, Yimin Xu1, Xiangyu Shao2, Tao Cheng2, Zhenling Ji2, Xinchao Song3, Junsheng Li2,()   

  1. 1. School of Medicine Southeast University, Nanjing 210014, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing 210014, China
    3. Department of General Surgery, Xuzhou First peoples’ Hospital, Xuzhou 221002, China
  • Received:2022-08-23 Published:2023-11-15
  • Corresponding author: Junsheng Li
引用本文:

黄香港, 赵怡欣, 徐易敏, 邵翔宇, 程滔, 嵇振岭, 宋兴超, 李俊生. 生物补片在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 176-180.

Xianggang Huang, Yixin Zhao, Yimin Xu, Xiangyu Shao, Tao Cheng, Zhenling Ji, Xinchao Song, Junsheng Li. Clinical efficacy study of biological mesh application in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2023, 10(04): 176-180.

目的

探究生物补片在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中的应用效果。

方法

前瞻性收集2022年1月至2023年9月在东南大学附属中大医院疝与腹壁外科就诊的60例食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病患者的临床资料并进行随访,所有患者均行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术加胃底折叠术并且在术中应用生物补片,分别于术后第1、3、6个月进行随访,随访内容包括反酸、烧心、胸痛、呕吐、满意度、复发以及补片相关并发症,对比术前术后相关指标。

结果

所有患者均顺利完成手术,无中转开腹,患者术前平均年龄(61.85±15.83)岁,平均体质量指数(24.44±3.65)kg/m2,平均手术时间(125.83±45.67)min,平均疝宽度(3.10±1.27)cm, 其中滑动性食管裂孔疝31例(51.67%),总住院时间(9.44±3.32)d。术后平均随访(10.68±6.15)个月,术后1个月随访完成率100%,术后3个月随访完成率98.33%,术后6个月随访完成率78.33%。患者术后反酸、烧心等胃食管反流症状较术前均明显改善,术前患者总体满意度评分为中位数3(2~4),术后6个月时患者总体满意度评分为中位数10(9~10),术后总体满意度明显提高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。共有3例患者复发,其中1例患者症状学加影像学复发,没有患者发生补片相关并发症。

结论

在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中应用生物补片是有效的、安全的,在随访期间没有发生补片相关并发症,患者总体满意度高。当然,这需要更长时间的随访来进一步评估疗效。

Objective

To study the effectiveness and safety of biological mesh in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.

Methods

Prospectively collect clinical data of 60 patients with hiatal hernia combined with gastroesophageal reflux disease who were seen at the Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery of the Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University from Jan. 1, 2022, to Sept. 30, 2023, and follow up the patients, all of whom were treated by laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and biological mesh was applied during the operation, respectively. All patients underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with gastric fundoplication and intraoperative reinforcement of the diaphragm with a biological mesh, and the patients were followed up at the 1st, 3rd and 6th months after the operation, including acid reflux, heartburn, vomiting, chest pain, Overall satisfaction, recurrence and mesh-related complications and comparing the preoperative and postoperative indexes.

Results

All patients successfully completed the surgery without intermediate openings, the mean preoperative age of the patients was (61.85±15.83) years, the mean body mass index was (24.44±3.65) kg/m2, the mean operative time was (125.83±45.67) min, the mean hernia width was (3.10±1.27) cm, sliding hiatal hernia was 31(51.67%) cases, the total hospitalization time was (9.44±3.32) d, and the mean postoperative follow-up was (10.68±6.15) months, the completion rate of postoperative follow-up was 100% at 1 month after the operation, the completion rate of postoperative follow-up was 98.33% at 3 months after the operation, and the completion rate of postoperative follow-up was 78.33% at 6 months after the operation, and the patients' postoperative symptoms of acid reflux and heartburn improved significantly compared with the preoperative ones, All of them improved significantly compared with the preoperative period. The overall satisfaction score of the patients before surgery was median 3 (2-4), and the overall satisfaction score of the patients at 6 months after surgery was median 10 (9-10), Overall postoperative satisfaction was significantly higher and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), a total of 3 patients had recurrence, including 1 patient with symptomatic plus radiographic recurrence, and no patient had mesh-related complications.

Conclusion

The use of biological mesh in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair was effective and safe, with no mesh-related complications and high overall patient satisfaction during the follow-up period, which, of course, needs to be longer.

图1 将生物补片缝合固定在膈肌角
图2 完成食管裂孔疝修补术(生物补片加强)和胃底折叠 A食管裂孔疝生物补片修补(博辉瑞进生物补片)+胃底折叠nissen术式 B食管裂孔疝生物补片修补(BD生物补片)+胃底折叠nissen术式
表1 患者随访相关数据
1
Alicuben ET, Worrell SG, DeMeester SR. Resorbable biosynthetic mesh for crural reinforcement during hiatal hernia repair[J]. Am Surg, 2014, 80(10):1030-1033.
2
克力木·阿布都热依木,王志,张成,等. 胃食管反流病的外科手术治疗展望[J]. 中华普通外科杂志,2016,31(9):721-723
3
彭鹏, 陈杰. 生物补片在食管裂孔疝修补手术中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2023, 38(8):636-640
4
陈双,周太成,马宁.食管裂孔疝的病理生理[J/OL].中华胃食管反流病电子杂志,2019,6(2):49-54.
5
Temperley HC, Davey MG, O'Sullivan NJ, et al. What works best in hiatus hernia repair, sutures alone, absorbable mesh or non-absorbable mesh? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2022, 36(7):doac101.
6
Antoniou SA, Koch OO, Antoniou GA, et al. Mesh-reinforced hiatal hernia repair: a review on the effect on postoperative dysphagia and recurrence[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2012, 397(1):19-27.
7
Quesada BM, Coturel AE. Use of absorbable meshes in laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair[J]. World J Gastrointest Surg, 2019, 11(10):388-394.
8
周太成,江志鹏,李英儒,等.食管裂孔疝及胃食管反流性疾病腹腔镜下规范化七步法手术操作指南(2021版)[J].岭南现代临床外科,2021,21(5):500-506.
9
Vasudevan V, Reusche R, Nelson E, et al. Robotic paraesophageal hernia repair: a single-center experience and systematic review[J]. J Robot Surg, 2018, 12(1):81-86.
10
Oleynikov D, Jolley JM. Paraesophageal hernia[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2015, 95(3):555-565.
11
Alicuben ET, Worrell SG, DeMeester SR. Resorbable biosynthetic mesh for crural reinforcement during hiatal hernia repair[J]. Am Surg, 2014, 80(10):1030-1033.
12
韩硕,杨慧琪,聂玉胜,等. 腹腔镜下补片修补食管裂孔疝的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2022,16(1):8-13.
13
Wang CQ, Tran T, Montera B, et al. Symptomatic, radiological, and quality of life outcome of paraesophageal hernia repair with urinary bladder extracellular surgical matrix: comparison with primary repair[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2019, 29(3):182-186.
14
Saad AR, Velanovich V. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: are old questions answered? Mesh hernioplasty[J]. Arq Bras Cir Dig, 2023, 35:e1710.
15
Sathasivam R, Bussa G, Viswanath Y, et al. 'Mesh hiatal hernioplasty' versus 'suture cruroplasty' in laparoscopic para-oesophageal hernia surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Asian J Surg, 2019, 42(1):53-60.
16
Clapp B, Kara AM, Nguyen-Lee PJ, et al. Does bioabsorbable mesh reduce hiatal hernia recurrence rates? A meta-analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2023, 37(3):2295-2303.
17
Schmidt E, Shaligram A, Reynoso JF, et al. Hiatal hernia repair with biologic mesh reinforcement reduces recurrence rate in small hiatal hernias[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2014, 27(1):13-17
18
Frantzides CT, Madan AK, Carlson MA, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia[J]. Arch Surg, 2002, 137(6):649-652
19
Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter J, et al. Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2006, 244(4):481-490
20
Cheng F, Liang H, Zhang Y, et al. Tension-free hiatal hernia repair with biological mesh: a real-world experience[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2022, 101(45):e31782.
21
Pandolfino JE, El-Serag HB, Zhang Q, et al. Obesity: a challenge to esophagogastric junction integrity[J]. Gastroenterology, 2006, 130(3):639-649
22
田文, 马冰. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝诊断和治疗[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2014, 1(1):7-8.
23
Li J, Cheng T. Mesh erosion after hiatal hernia repair: the tip of the iceberg?[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(6):1243-1252
24
Stadlhuber RJ, Sherif AE, Mittal SK, et al. Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: a 28-case series[J]. Surg Endosc, 2009, 23(6):1219-1226.
25
Acin-Gandara D, Miliani-Molina C, Carneros-Martin J, et al.Transmural gastric migration of dual-sided PTFE/ePTFEE mesh after laparoscopic surgery for a recurrent hiatal hernia with dysphagia: case report[J]. Chirurgia (Bucur), 2014,109(4):538-541
26
傅晓键,花荣,姚琪远. 食管裂孔疝补片修补术后补片侵蚀一例[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志,2018,5(2):90-91.
27
Ringley CD, Bochkarev V, Ahmed SI, et al. Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with human acellular dermal matrix patch: our initial experience[J]. Am J Surg, 2006, 192(6):767-772.
28
杨慧琪,尹杰,逯景辉,等.食管裂孔疝修补材料的选择及固定的专家微共识[J/OL].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2022,16(1):1-7.
[1] 孙丕绛, 李剑波, 杨永君, 冉超, 王槐志. 腹腔镜下肠系膜上动脉优先入路扩大清扫的胰十二指肠切除术(en-bolc)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 249-249.
[2] 李凯, 张志远, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 一种可拆卸组装的腹腔镜手术器械在单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 250-250.
[3] 杨尹默, 陈依然, 田孝东. 努力提高腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的规范化水平[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 237-242.
[4] 张太平, 刘悦泽. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术要点与原则[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 243-245.
[5] 王槐志, 孙丕绛, 崔上. 腹腔镜下胰十二指肠切除术的难点与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 246-248.
[6] 孟宇, 李金超, 刘金来, 刘晨, 王振勇. 新辅助化疗后LPD钩突切除中先动脉后静脉原则的安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 251-254.
[7] 宫向良, 刘征, 丁梅. 基于膜解剖D2+CME根治术治疗胃癌的近中期随访研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 267-270.
[8] 金田力, 袁文正, 付涛. 单孔腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术后尿管拔除时机探讨[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 271-274.
[9] 杜彦斌, 黄涛, 寇天阔, 石英. 双镜联合根治术与腹腔镜根治术在早期结肠癌患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 275-278.
[10] 张聃, 王毅, 冯文迪, 方兴中. 完整结肠系膜切除术与传统根治术治疗结肠癌对患者生存期的影响观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 279-282.
[11] 唐浩, 梁平, 程千里, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 基于数字化微创技术对复杂性肝胆管结石患者胆道、肝静脉、门静脉解剖与变异情况及应用效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 291-294.
[12] 王东阳, 林琳, 娄熙彬. SII对局部进展期胃癌nCRT+腹腔镜胃癌根治术后并发症及预后的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 315-318.
[13] 吴鹏, 许维, 王壮, 郑世海, 宋劲松. 隧道法行腹腔镜下脾切除术的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 319-322.
[14] 薛昶, 王翔, 冯利, 金鑫, 王治伟. 生物补片盆底修补术和直接缝合术在低位直肠癌患者盆底重建中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 327-329.
[15] 聂彬, 赵铁军, 于云宝, 李欢, 谢林峻. 单孔加一孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗乙状结肠癌的疗效与分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 330-333.
阅读次数
全文


摘要