切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 126 -129. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2024.03.003

论著

手术治疗胃食管反流病对患者生活质量和心理状态影响的研究
华丽1, 仲卫冬1, 胡根1, 张丽英1, 邵国益1,()   
  1. 1.214400 江阴,南通大学附属江阴医院、江阴市人民医院综合普外一科
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-17 出版日期:2024-08-15
  • 通信作者: 邵国益
  • 基金资助:
    无锡市卫生健康委中青年拔尖人才项目(HB2023102)江阴市卫生健康委员会青年科研项目(Q202204)徐州医科大学附属医院发展基金重点项目(XYFZ202302)

Study on the psychological state of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease before and after surgery

Li Hua1, Weidong Zhong1, Gen Hu1, Liying Zhang1, Guoyi Shao1,()   

  1. 1.Department of General Surgery,Jiangyin People’s Hospital affiliated to Nantong University,Jiangyin 214400,China
  • Received:2024-02-17 Published:2024-08-15
  • Corresponding author: Guoyi Shao
引用本文:

华丽, 仲卫冬, 胡根, 张丽英, 邵国益. 手术治疗胃食管反流病对患者生活质量和心理状态影响的研究[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 126-129.

Li Hua, Weidong Zhong, Gen Hu, Liying Zhang, Guoyi Shao. Study on the psychological state of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease before and after surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2024, 11(03): 126-129.

目的

探讨手术治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)对患者生活质量和心理状态的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2019 年1 月至2023 年11 月江苏省江阴市人民医院普通外科因GERD 接受手术治疗的36 例患者的临床资料,采用GERD 健康相关生活质量量表(GERD-HRQL)评估患者手术前后的生活质量,焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)评价患者接受手术前后心理状况。

结果

手术治疗前和术后1 个月GERD-HRQL 评分为(18.69±7.88)、(4.72±3.50)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);手术治疗前和术后1 月SAS 评分分别为(33.25±3.35)、(30.56±2.91)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);手术治疗前和术后1 月SDS 评分分别为(29.89±2.54)、(27.97±1.98)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。35 例患者手术后半年GERD-HRQL 评分为(4.06±2.45)分,SAS 评分和SDS 评分分别为(30.40±2.16)、(28.49±1.29)分。

结论

手术治疗后患者胃食管反流症状明显缓解,生活质量显著改善,术后患者焦虑和抑郁症状明显好转。

Objective

To explore the effect of gastroesophageal reflux disease surgery on the quality of life and psychology of patients.

Methods

The clinical data of 36 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who underwent surgery in the General Surgery Department of Jiangyin People's Hospital from January 2019 to November 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The GERD health-related quality of life scale (GERD-HRQL) was used to evaluate the quality of life of the patients before and after surgery. Selfrating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) were used to evaluate the psychological status of patients before and after surgery.

Results

The mean GERD-HRQL scores before operation and 1 month after operation were (18.69±7.88) and (4.72±3.50) points, the difference is statistically significant(P<0.05). The mean SAS scores before operation and 1 month after operation were (33.25±3.35) and(30.56±2.91) points, the difference is statistically significant(P<0.05). The mean SDS scores before operation and 1 month after operation were (29.89±2.54) and (27.97±1.98)points, the difference is statistically significant (P< 0.05). The mean GERD-HRQL score of 35 patients half a year after operation was (4.06±2.45) points, SAS score and SDS score were (30.40±2.16) and (28.49±1.29) points,respectively.

Conclusion

The symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux, the quality of life and the symptoms of anxiety and depression were significantly improved after surgery.

表1 36 例胃食管反流病患者临床资料
表2 胃食管反流病患者手术治疗前后生活质量及心理情况的比较(分,±s
1
Nirwan JS, Hasan SS, Babar ZUD, et al. Global prevalence and risk factors of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD): systematic review with meta-analysis [J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 5814.
2
中国医疗保健国际交流促进会胃食管反流病学分会.中国胃食管反流病多学科诊疗共识2022(一) [J/OL].中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2022, 9(2): 36.
3
Eusebi LH, Ratnakumaran R, Yuan Y, et al.Global prevalence of, and risk factors for, gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms: a meta-analysis[J]. Gut, 2018, 67(3): 430-440.
4
Ness-Jensen E, Lagergren J. Tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2017, 31(5): 501-508.
5
Jansson C, Wallander MA, Johansson S, et al. Stressful psychosocial factors and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a populationbased study in Norway [J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2010; 45(1): 21-29.
6
Zamani M, Alizadeh-Tabari S, Chan WW, et al. Association between anxiety/depression and gastroesophageal reflux: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2023, 118(12): 2133-2143.
7
Zeng Y, Cao S, Yang H. The causal role of gastroesophageal reflux disease in anxiety disorders and depression: a bidirectional mendelian randomization study [J]. Front Psychiatry, 2023, 14: 1135923.
8
Kim SY, Kim HJ, Lim H, et al. Bidirectional association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and depression: two different nested case-control studies using a national sample cohort [J]. Sci Rep, 2018,8(1): 11748.
9
Kamolz T, Velanovich V. Psychological and emotional aspects of gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. Dis Esophagus, 2002, 15(3): 199-203.
10
Naliboff BD, Mayer M, Fass R, et al. The effect of life stress on symptoms of heartburn [J]. Psychosom Med, 2004, 120(5):A418.
11
Brahm NC, Kelly-Rehm MC. Antidepressant-mediated gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. Consult Pharm, 2011, 26(4): 274-278.
12
Altomare A, Guarino MP, Cocca S, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: update on inflammation and symptom perception [J].World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19(39): 6523-6528.
13
Lampa J, Westman M, Kadetoff D, et al. Peripheral inflammatory disease associated with centrally activated IL-1 system in humans and mice [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2012, 109(31): 12728-12733.
14
Berk M, Williams LJ, Jacka FN, et al. So depression is an inflammatory disease, but where does the inflammation come from? [J].BMC Medicine, 2013, 11:200.
15
Goldstein BI, Kemp DE, Soczynska JK, et al. Inflammation and the phenomenology, pathophysiology, comorbidity, and treatment of bipolar disorder: a systematic review of the literature [J]. J Clin Psychiatry, 2009, 70(8): 1078-1090.
16
Altena E, Micoulaud-Franchi JA, Geoffroy PA, et al. The bidirectional relation between emotional reactivity and sleep: from disruption to recovery [J]. Behav Neurosci, 2016, 130(3): 336-350.
17
Yang XJ, Jiang HM, Hou XH, et al. Anxiety and depression in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and their effect on quality of life[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(14): 4302-4309.
18
Alwhaibi M. Anxiety and depression and health-related quality of life in adults with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a population-based study [J]. Healthcare, 2023, 11(19): 2637.
[1] 张熙东, 贾贺杰, 冯锐, 李路亚, 乔永志, 郑颖. 急诊患者家属焦虑的影响因素[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 319-324.
[2] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[3] 高金红, 陈玉梅, 郭韵. 基于King互动达标理论的心理疏导在腹腔镜肝癌切除术患者的应用效果分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 517-520.
[4] 邢益民, 张天飞, 戴慧勇. 胃肠充盈超声造影检查在反酸、嗳气患者临床诊断中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 303-306.
[5] 李海云, 赵敏娴, 申英末, 杨慧琪. 胃底折叠术预防食管裂孔疝术后并发症的研究进展[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 485-490.
[6] 玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.
[7] 任传富, 杨志, 徐恩, 何梓芸, 罗板鑫, 陈新, 夏雪峰. 腹腔镜疝修补术联合胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病40 例临床分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 507-511.
[8] 杜晨阳, 王勇, 段鑫, 柯文杰, 石念, 武英翔, 罗文. 腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术后吞咽困难的危险因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 523-527.
[9] 胡志伟, 吴继敏, 汪忠镐, 张美光. 胃食管反流病食管外症状抗反流手术适应证及术前评估[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 241-246.
[10] 胡志伟, 吴继敏, 邓昌荣, 战秀岚, 纪涛, 王峰, 田书瑞, 陈冬, 张玉, 刘健男, 宋庆. 抗反流黏膜套扎治疗顽固性胃食管反流病[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 227-233.
[11] 王玲, 樊文彬, 倪嘉淳, 蔡增进. 功能性便秘与焦虑抑郁共病的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 411-416.
[12] 唐小久, 胡曼, 许必君, 肖亚. 肥胖合并胃食管反流病患者严重程度与其焦虑抑郁及营养状态的相关性研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 360-364.
[13] 白杰, 王唯一, 陈超, 王帆, 肖新如. 神经外科住培医师职业倦怠及影响因素研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 662-670.
[14] 马云霞, 于金勇, 魏淑凤, 韩臣子. 耳穴疗法对肝气郁结型甲状腺结节合并焦虑抑郁的临床疗效观察[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 348-354.
[15] 中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和代谢病外科专家工作组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会胃食管反流疾病诊疗外科专家工作组, 日本肥胖治疗学会, 韩国减重与代谢外科学会. 袖状胃切除术患者胃食管反流病诊治专家共识(2024版)[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 145-162.
阅读次数
全文


摘要