切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 47 -51. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2025.01.008

综述

生物补片材料在疝外科的应用及研究现状
苏拉依曼·牙库甫1, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明1,2, 依丽娜尔阿依·艾力亚尔1,2, 李义亮1,2,()   
  1. 1830054 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学研究生学院
    2830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创、疝和腹壁外科,普外微创研究所,新疆胃食管反流病与减重代谢外科临床医学研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-10 出版日期:2025-02-15
  • 通信作者: 李义亮
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82060166); 自治区重点研发任务专项(2023B03010)

Application and research status of biological mesh materials in hernia surgery

Yakufu Sulayiman·1, Maimaitiming Maimaitiaili·1,2, ailiyaer Yilinaerayi·1,2, Yiliang Li1,2,()   

  1. 1Graduate School of Medicine, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China
    2Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Research Institute of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Xinjiang Clinical Research Center for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Bariatric Metabolic Surgery, People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830001, China
  • Received:2024-09-10 Published:2025-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Yiliang Li
引用本文:

苏拉依曼·牙库甫, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 依丽娜尔阿依·艾力亚尔, 李义亮. 生物补片材料在疝外科的应用及研究现状[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2025, 12(01): 47-51.

Yakufu Sulayiman·, Maimaitiming Maimaitiaili·, ailiyaer Yilinaerayi·, Yiliang Li. Application and research status of biological mesh materials in hernia surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2025, 12(01): 47-51.

疝修补术是普通外科最常见手术方式之一,其中无张力疝修补术是现代疝外科主流的手术方案。疝修补术主要目的是腹壁缺损的修复与重建,恢复筋膜层的生理结构以及腹壁功能。因此,在疝外科领域中选择一款符合人类解剖学结构、组织相容性良好且感染与疼痛发生率低的修补材料,对提升患者术后生活质量至关重要,这亦是当前疝外科医师亟待攻克的难题。我国腹壁外科20余年的发展过程中,已有超200多余种疝补片广泛应用于临床当中。近几年来,生物补片作为疝外科新兴材料之一,为广泛疝患者带来了曙光,获得了满意的临床疗效,成为了学科领域的焦点。但整体仍处于探索阶段,值得进一步探讨。本文旨重点介绍生物补片在疝外究进一步叙述。

Hernia repair is one of the most common surgical procedures in general surgery, and tension-free hernia repair has become the mainstream surgical option in modern hernia surgery. The primary goals of hernia repair are to repair and reconstruct abdominal wall defects, restore the physiological structure of the fascia layer, and recover abdominal wall function. Therefore, selecting a mesh material that conforms to human anatomy, has good biocompatibility, and is associated with low rates of infection, erosion, and pain is crucial for enhancing patients' postoperative quality of life. Furthermore, the ability of such a material to benefit different types of hernias, various surgical procedures, and diverse patient populations through a single mesh, thereby reducing postoperative complications and improving quality of life, remains a significant challenge for hernia surgeons. During the more than 20 years of development in abdominal wall surgery in China, over 200 types of hernia meshes have been widely used in clinical practice. In recent years, biological mesh, as one of the emerging materials in hernia surgery, has offered promise for a broad spectrum of hernia patients and demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes, becoming a focal point within the field. However, its application is still largely in the exploratory stage and warrants further investigation. This article aims to provide a focused overview of the application of biological mesh in hernia surgery.

1
Stabilini C, van Veenendaal N, Aasvang E, et al.Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management[J]. BJS Open, 2024, 8(2): zrae034
2
Henriksen NA, Montgomery A, Kaufmann R, et al. Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society[J]. Br J Surg, 2020, 107(3): 171-190.
3
Wang F, Ma B, Ma Q, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of inguinal, femoral, and abdominal hernias: a systematic analysis of prevalence, incidence, deaths, and DALYs with projections to 2030[J]. Int J Surg, 2024, 110(4): 1951-1967.
4
Stanaway JD, Afshin A, Gakidou E, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017[J]. Lancet, 2018, 392(10159): 1923-1994.
5
Patel VH, Wright AS. Controversies in inguinal hernia[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2021, 101(6): 1067-1079.
6
唐健雄,黄磊,李绍杰. 生物材料在腹壁疝治疗中的现状和前景[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2020,19(7): 720-724.
7
Baylon K, Rodriguez-Camarillo P, Elias-Zuniga A, et al. Past, present and future of surgical meshes: a review[J]. Membranes, 2017, 7(3): 47.
8
Saiding Q, Chen Y, Wang J, et al. Abdominal wall hernia repair: from prosthetic meshes to smart materials[J]. Mater Today Bio, 2023, 21: 100691.
9
Peppas G, Gkegkes ID, Makris MC, et al. Biological mesh in hernia repair, abdominal wall defects, and reconstruction and treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of the clinical evidence[J]. Am Surg, 2010, 76(11): 1290-1299.
10
Najm A, Niculescu AG, Gaspar BS, et al. A review of abdominal meshes for hernia repair—current status and emerging solutions[J]. Materials, 2023, 16(22): 7124.
11
张顺,李海涛,武彪. 材料学在疝和腹壁外科应用的现状与展望[J]. 手术, 2016, 1(3): 53-56.
12
Huang SP, Hsu CC, Chang SC, et al. Adipose-derived stem cells seeded on acellular dermal matrix grafts enhance wound healing in a murine model of a full-thickness defect[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2012, 69(6):656-662.
13
Iacco A, Adeyemo A, Riggs T, et al. Single institutional experience using biological mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction[J]. Am J Surg, 2014, 208(3): 480-484.
14
Bealee W, Hoxworth RE, Livingston EH, et al. The role of biologic mesh in abdominal wall reconstruction: a systematic review of the current literature[J]. Am J Surg, 2012, 204(4): 510-517.
15
Jiang W, Zhang J, Lv X, et al. Use of small intestinal submucosal and acellular dermal matrix grafts in giant omphaloceles in neonates and a rabbit abdominal wall defect model[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2016, 51(3): 368-373.
16
Mondalek FG, Ashley RA, Roth CC, et al. Enhanced angiogenesis of modified porcine small intestinal submucosa with hyaluronic acid-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles: from fabrication to preclinical validation[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2010, 94(3): 712-719.
17
Zhou HY, Zhang J, Yan RL, et al. Improving the antibacterial property of porcine small intestinal submucosa by nano-silver supplementation: a promising biological material to address the need for contaminated defect repair[J]. Ann Surg, 2011, 253(5): 1033-1041.
18
宋致成,顾岩. 应用猪小肠黏膜下层与肌腱细胞构建组织工程支架修复大鼠腹壁缺损的实验研究 [J]. 外科理论与实践, 2012, 17(3): 270-274.
19
Ravo B, Falasco G. Pure tissue inguinal hernia repair with the use of biological mesh: a 10-year follows up. A prospective study[J]. Hernia, 2020, 24(1): 121-126.
20
Li B, Zhanc X, Man Y, et al. Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repairs with porcine small intestine submucosa: a 5- year follow-up. a prospective randomized controlled study[J]. Regen Biomater, 2021, 8(1): rbaa055.
21
Agresta F, Bedin N. Transabdominal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: is there a place for biological mesh? [J]. Hernia, 2008, 12(6): 609-612.
22
Ansaioni L, Gazzotti F, Pinna AD. Inguinal hernia repair with porcine small intestine submucosa: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial of Lichtenstein’s repair with polypropylene mesh versus surgisis inguinal hernia matrix[J]. Am J Surg, 2009,198(3): 303-312.
23
Fang Z, Ren F, Zhou J, et al. Biologic mesh versus synthetic mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: system review and meta-analysis[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2015, 85(12): 910-6.
24
Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, et al. Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair[J]. Surgery, 2010, 148(3): 544-558.
25
唐健雄,黄磊,李绍杰. 生物材料在腹壁疝治疗中的现状和前景[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2020,19(7): 720-724.
26
Brescia A, Tomassini F, Berardi G, et al. Post-incisional ventral hernia repair in patients undergoing chemotherapy: improving outcomes with biological mesh[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2016, 14(1): 257.
27
De Vries FEE, Hodgkinson JD, et al. Long-term outcomes after contaminated complex abdominal wall reconstruction[J]. Hernia, 2020, 24(3): 459-468.
28
Van den Dop LM, Van Rooijen MMJ, Tollens T, et al. Five-year follow-up of a slowly resorbable biosynthetic P4HB mesh (Phasix) in VHWG grade 3 incisional hernia repair[J]. Ann Surg Open, 2023, 4(4): e366.
29
Coccolini F, Catena F, Bertuzzo VR, et al. Abdominal wall defect repair with biological prosthesis in transplanted patients: single center retrospective analysis and review of the literature[J]. Updates Surg, 2013, 65(3): 191-196.
30
Zolper EG, Black CK, Devulapalli C, et al. Long term outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction using open component separation and biologic mesh in the liver, kidney, and small bowel transplant population[J]. Hernia, 2020, 24(3): 469-479.
31
Harkiran S, Miriam M, Pankaj C, et al. Biological Mesh repair of a large incisional hernia containing a kidney transplant in the presence of inflammation[J]. Case Rep Transplant, 2020, 2020: 5675613.
32
Umit O, Halime C, Yuce HB, et al. Use of biological prosthesis in a patient with kidney and pancreas transplant and a giant incisional hernia: case report[J]. Exp Clin Transplant, 2015, 13(Suppl 1): 231-234.
33
Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter JG, et al. Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2011, 213(4): 461-468.
34
Wang B, Zhang W, Shan CX, et al. Long-term outcomes of cruroplasty reinforcement with composite versus biologic mesh for gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(7): 2865-2872.
35
姚国良,姚琪远,花荣,等.生物补片修补食管裂孔疝的效果:1年随访[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2011,15(3): 491-494.
36
杜华栋,刘小莉,聂玉胜,等. 生物补片与合成补片用于腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术短期临床疗效及安全性比较:一项多中心对照研究 [J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2024, 44(4): 447-451.
37
Antonakis F, Köckerling F, Kallinowski F, et al. Functional results after repair of large hiatal hernia by use of a biologic mesh [J]. Front Surg, 2016, 3: 16.
38
Antoniou SA, Muller-Stich BP, Antoniou GA, et al. Laparoscopic augmentation of the diaphragmatic hiatus with biologic mesh versus suture repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2015, 400(5): 577-583.
39
麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明,艾克拜尔,李义亮,等. 生物补片在腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术的临床疗效分析 [J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2019, 6(3): 144-147.
40
Gillian GK, Bansal D. Retrospective review and prospective follow-up of 85 consecutive patients treated with a novel hepatic-derived surgical mesh for hiatal hernia repair: outcomes, surgical complications, and revisions[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2019, 29(6): 529-533.
41
Korwar V, Adjepong S, Pattar J, et al. Biological mesh repair of paraesophageal hernia: an analysis of our outcomes[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2019, 29(11): 1446-1450.
[1] 王雅楠, 刘丹, 曹正浓, 贾慧敏. 儿童迟发性先天性膈疝患儿的临床诊治特点分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 410-419.
[2] 薛昶, 王翔, 冯利, 金鑫, 王治伟. 生物补片盆底修补术和直接缝合术在低位直肠癌患者盆底重建中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 327-329.
[3] 魏子雯, 谢永怡, 郭洪瑞, 胡金奇, 李鹏. 机器人胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 466-469.
[4] 依力帕·肖克来提, 王丹, 李义亮. 生物补片在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 470-474.
[5] 毛永欢, 朱浩, 张简之, 缪骥, 李强, 喻春钊. 结肠造口还纳联合生物补片置入术的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 434-437.
[6] 刘虎, 任振, 韦笑韩, 王书翰, 潘晨, 吴立胜. 基于心下囊解剖的腹腔镜大食管裂孔疝补片修补术单中心40例分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 417-421.
[7] 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 李义亮, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 王俭, 蒋媛, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 贲门失弛缓症合并食管裂孔疝手术技巧及临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 265-268.
[8] 嵇振岭, 刘宗航. 谈谈食管裂孔疝手术中食管裂孔缺损修补的方法[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 245-252.
[9] 王浦, 高博. 分期手术治疗巨大食管裂孔疝合并胃扭转一例[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-119.
[10] 张红鹤, 杜亚君, 严华艳, 胡艳萍, 杨春旭, 王倩. 食管裂孔疝发生的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[11] 邱雨豪, 黄金向, 朱小轩, 罗峰, 黄河, 姚晖, 汪雪. 多学科诊疗联合加速康复外科模式在食管裂孔疝诊疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-62.
[12] 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 李慧灵, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李赞林, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 生物补片修补巨大复发性腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-628.
[13] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[14] 孙明策, 韩世焕. 海藻酸盐水凝胶支架在颅骨缺损修复中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 310-314.
[15] 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 王浩, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李义亮, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 食管裂孔疝合并哮喘患者的危险因素[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2025, 12(01): 17-21.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?