Abstract:
Objective
Clinical studies of Anti-reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are rare. This study observed the clinical efficacy of ARMA on GERD through a retrospective study.
Methods
Retrospective analysis of the efficacy of ARMA in patients identified as GERD by 24 h dynamic esophageal pH monitoring. Efficacy was observed by 24 h dynamic esophageal pH monitoring, GERD-Q scale score and quality-of-life rating scale (SF-36) before and after 6 months. The efficacy of ARMA in different gastroesophageal reflux valve (GEFV) grades was also observed.
Results
Thirty-six patients were included in this study. Six months after ARMA, 30 patients with positive GERD-Q scores turned negative or decreased scores, with a response rate of 83.3% (30/36). 25 patients with positive GERD-Q score were cured without taking PPI, with a cure rate of 69.4% (25/36). In patients with grades Ⅰ-Ⅲ of GEFV, 24 h dynamic esophageal pH monitoring showed 6 months after surgery,with a statistically significant improvement in GERD-Q score and SF-36 score (P<0.05). At the same time,the dosage and frequency of acid reflux, heartburn, chest pain and PPI drugs were significantly improved.Meanwhile, GEFV patients with 24 h after surgery had acid mixed reflux, and their GERD-Q scores and SF-36 scores were not statistically different compared with preoperative ones (P >0.05).
Conclusion
ARMA has good efficacy in GERD patients with GEFV grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ and poor efficacy in patients with GEFV gradeⅣ.
Key words:
Gastroesophageal reflux disease,
Anti-reflux mucosal ablation,
Gastroesophageal reflux valve
Jing Zhang, Jun Bai, Yumen Chen, Peng Zhang, Fangfang Hou, Junfang Wang, Jing Sun, Shibo Zhao, Zhe Yang, Yue Zhang, Ruifang Zhang, Hongbin Zhu. Clinical efficacy study of anti-reflux mucosal ablation in gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2024, 11(03): 121-125.