切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华胃食管反流病电子杂志

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 01 ›› Issue (01) : 24 -27. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2014.01.007

所属专题： 经典病例； 总编推荐； 文献；

论著

气腹与腹壁悬吊无气腹结合腹腔镜手术治疗滑动型食管裂孔疝17例疗效分析
张葆勋1, 伍冀湘1,†(), 蒋俭1, 于涛1, 于磊1, 李建业1   
  1. 1. 100730　首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2014-06-20 出版日期:2014-11-15
  • 通信作者: 伍冀湘

Seventeen cases of analysis of efficacy for sliding esophageal hiatal hernia by laparoscopy via pneumoperitoneum and non-pneumoperitoneum through abdominal wall lifting

Baoxun Zhang1, Jixiang Wu1,†(), Jian Jiang1, Tao Yu1, Lei Yu1, Jianye Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tong Ren Hospital, Capital University of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730 China
  • Received:2014-06-20 Published:2014-11-15
  • Corresponding author: Jixiang Wu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

张葆勋, 伍冀湘, 蒋俭, 于涛, 于磊, 李建业. 气腹与腹壁悬吊无气腹结合腹腔镜手术治疗滑动型食管裂孔疝17例疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2014, 01(01): 24-27.

Baoxun Zhang, Jixiang Wu, Jian Jiang, Tao Yu, Lei Yu, Jianye Li. Seventeen cases of analysis of efficacy for sliding esophageal hiatal hernia by laparoscopy via pneumoperitoneum and non-pneumoperitoneum through abdominal wall lifting[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2014, 01(01): 24-27.

目的

评估气腹与腹壁悬吊无气腹结合腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补和胃底折叠术治疗滑动型食管裂孔疝的临床价值。

方法

回顾性分析2012年5月至2014年5月，北京同仁医院胸外科进行的17例气腹与腹壁悬吊无气腹结合腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补和胃底折叠术的临床资料，其中采用Nissen术式15例，Toupet术式2例。

结果

所有患者均顺利完成手术，无中转开腹，平均手术时间为45～220 min，术中出血量均小于50 ml，无术后并发症，全部治愈出院，术后平均住院时间10 d。随访时间1～24个月，16例患者临床症状完全消失，1例临床症状部分缓解，无明确复发病例。

结论

气腹与腹壁悬吊无气腹结合腹腔镜滑动型食管裂孔疝修补和胃底折叠术是一种安全有效的外科治疗，具有广泛的推广价值。

关键词: 疝，食管裂孔, 疝修补术, 胃底折叠术, 腹腔镜, 腹壁悬吊无气腹
Objective

To evaluate the clinical value of the method of surgical treatment in patients with sliding esophageal hiatal hernia by laparoscopy via pneumoperitoneum and non-pneumoperitoneum through abdominal wall lifting.

Methods

The clinical data of 17 cases of laparoscopic esophageal hiatal hernia repair combined with and gastric folding via pneumoperitoneum and non-pneumoperitoneum through abdominal wall lifting was collected between May 2012 and May 2014, including 15 cases of Nissen operation and, 2 cases of Toupet operation.

Results

Surgeries in all patients were successfully completed, no transferring laparotomy, the average operation time was 45 to 220 minutes, intraoperative blood loss was less than 50 ml, there were no postoperative complications, all patients were cured and discharged, and the average hospitalization time was 10 days. Follow-up period was between 1 to 24 months. Clinical symptoms in 16 patients disappeared completely, and clinical symptoms in 1 case partly relieved, with no relapsed case.

Conclusion

Sliding esophageal hiatal hernia by laparoscopy via pneumoperitoneum and non-pneumoperitoneum through abdominal wall lifting is a safe and effective surgical treatment, and has wide value of popularization.

Key words: Hernia, hiatus, Herniorrhaphy, Fundoplication, Laparoscope, Abdominal wall lifting
1
汪建超，许建明．食管裂孔疝的内镜诊断价值[J]．蚌埠医学院学报，2008，33(5)：529-551.
2
Sonnenberg A. Motion-Laparoseopie Nissen fundoplieation is more cost-effective than oral PPI administration: arguments against the motion[J]. Can J Gastroenterol, 2002, 16(9): 627-631.
3
Zhang L, Zhou LY, Lin SR, et al. Reflux symptom questionnaire in the diagnosis of reflux oesophagitis[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2007, 120(23): 2146-2148.
4
Lee J, Anggiansah A, Anggiansah R, et al. Effects of age on the gastroesophageal junction, esophageal motility, and reflux disease[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2007, 5(12): 1392-1398.
5
Mori T, Atomi Y. Laparoscopic repair of esophageal hiatal hernia[J]. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi, 2003, 104(9): 587-592.
6
Dallemagne B, Weerts JM, Jehaes C, et al. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: Preliminary report[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991, 1(3): 138-143.
7
赵鹏，张国志，陈建立，等．腹腔镜微创手术治疗食管裂孔疝临床观察[J]．河北医药，2012，34(8)：1143-1145.
8
蔡秀军，郑雪咏．腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补、胃底折叠术的综合评价[J]．中华外科杂志，2006，44(1)：7-9.
9
Morrow EH, Oelschlager BK. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech[J]. 2013, 23(5): 446-448.
10
Morelli L, Guadagni S, Mariniello MD, et al. Robotic giant hiatal hernia repair: 3 year prospective evaluation and review of the literatureInt[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2015, 11(1): 1-7.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号

AI
小
编
AI小编
你好！我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编，有什么可以帮您的吗？