切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (04) : 162 -166. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2016.04.006

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

腹腔镜Nissen和Toupet胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病的术后效果评价
徐群1, 杨福全1,(), 刘佳鑫1, 郭自成1, 徐琨1, 孟相真1   
  1. 1. 110004 沈阳,中国医科大学附属盛京医院结直肠疝外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-31 出版日期:2016-11-15
  • 通信作者: 杨福全
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁省自然基金资助项目(2014021026)

Evaluation of laparoscoopic Nissen and Toupet fundopication in the treatment of gastroesophageal hiatal hernia complicated with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Qun Xu1, Fuquan Yang1,(), Jiaxin Liu1, Zicheng Guo1, Kun Xu1, Xiangzhen Meng1   

  1. 1. Thecolorectal and Hernia Surgery, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China
  • Received:2016-10-31 Published:2016-11-15
  • Corresponding author: Fuquan Yang
  • About author:
    Correspondent: Yang Fuquan, Email:
引用本文:

徐群, 杨福全, 刘佳鑫, 郭自成, 徐琨, 孟相真. 腹腔镜Nissen和Toupet胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病的术后效果评价[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2016, 03(04): 162-166.

Qun Xu, Fuquan Yang, Jiaxin Liu, Zicheng Guo, Kun Xu, Xiangzhen Meng. Evaluation of laparoscoopic Nissen and Toupet fundopication in the treatment of gastroesophageal hiatal hernia complicated with gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2016, 03(04): 162-166.

目的

探讨腹腔镜Nissen和Toupet胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病的疗效和术后并发症。

方法

回顾性分析2014年7月至2016年7月,在中国医科大学附属盛京医院行腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术的57例食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病患者的临床资料,其中24例行Nissen胃底折叠术式(Nissen组),33例行Toupet胃底折叠术式(Toupet组)。观察并比较2组患者的术后抗反流效果及发生术后并发症情况。

结果

57例均顺利完成腹腔镜下手术,无中转开腹,手术时间68~115 min,平均手术时间(75.8±6.4)min;术中出血量15~30 ml,平均出血量(22±5)ml;2组患者均使用补片行食管裂孔疝修补术;术后24 h进流食,术后平均住院日(10.5±3)d。2组患者手术时间,出血量,住院日无明显差别。57例患者均得到随访,随访时间为6个月至2.5年,平均随访时间为18个月。术后均未出现反酸,烧心等胃食管反流病典型症状,无复发病例。Nissen组术后有2例(8.2%)患者出现吞咽困难,Toupet组术后有8例(24.2%)出现吞咽困难,Toupet组术后并发症发生率明显高于Nissen组。术前伴有胃食管反流病的患者行胃镜检查均有不同程度的食管炎症,所有患者术后均复查胃镜、食管测压及食管24 h pH值监测。复查结果显示,2组患者术后较术前食管下括约肌压力均有明显改善,食管下括约肌长度也均明显延长。

结论

腹腔镜下Nissen术式在术后出现吞咽困难发生率上少于Toupet术式,但2种术式抗反流效果无明显差异。

Objective

To discuss the effect and postoperative complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease with hiatus hernia after fundoplication treatment of laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet.

Methods

Review the 57patients with laparoscopic esophageal hiatal hernia complicated with gastroesophageal reflux disease which be treated with Nissen and Toupet fundoplication from July 2014 to July 2016 in Shengjing Hospital affiliated to China Medical University, 24 patients underwent Nissen surgery(group Nissen), 33 patients underwent Toupet operation(group Toupet). Observed and compare the anti reflux effect and postoperative complications of the two groups.

Results

57 cases were successfully completed laparoscopically, without laparotomy, the average operation time was (75.8±6.4)minutes(the total operation time was 68 minutes~115 minutes); the average amount of bleeding was (22±5)ml(the amount of bleeding was 15 to 30 ml); patch repair was used in the two methods; after 24 hours into the liquid, the mean postoperative hospitalization was (10.5±3)d.57cases were followed up for a period of 6 months to 2.5 years(mean, 18 months). None of the patients had regurgitation, heartburn and other typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease after the surgery.In group Nissen, dysphagia occurred in 2 patients(8.2%); In group Toupet, dysphagia occurred in 8 patients(24.2%). The incidence of postoperative complications in group Toupet was significantly higher than that in group Nissen.All patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease underwent gastroscopy before operation.They had different degrees of esophageal inflammation.All patients reexamined gastroscopy, esophageal manometry an esophageal 24 hours PH monitor.Review results showed: the pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter was significantly increased in the two groups after operation; the length of the lower esophageal sphincter was also significantly prolonged.

Conclusion

laparoscopic Nissen surgery in the postoperative incidence of choke is better than the Toupet operation.But there was no significant difference between them.

表1 Nissen组与Toupet组术前症状分布情况[例(%)]
表2 Nissen组与Toupet组手术前后GERD-Q评分比较(±s)
表3 Nissen组与Toupet组手术前后食管测压指标对比(±s)
表4 Nissen组与Toupet组手术前后DeMeester评分比较(±s)
图1 Ⅲ型HH示意图
图3 Toupet
1
吴凯锴,杨福全.食管裂孔疝诊疗进展[J].中国实用外科杂志,2012,32(6):496-498.
2
张成,李俊生,克力木,等.2013年美国胃肠内镜外科医师协会食管裂孔病诊疗指南解读(一)[J/CD].中华胃食管反流病电子杂志,2015,2(1):6-9.
3
陈旻湖,侯晓华,肖英莲,等.中国胃食管反流病专家共识意见[J].中华消化杂志,2014(10):155-168.
4
张成,克力木,牛伟亚,等.腹腔镜下胃底Nissen折叠术式治疗的食管裂孔疝临床应用[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2010,4(1):53-56.
5
杨慧琪,秦明放.腹腔镜Nissen与Toupet胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流性疾病的临床分析[J].中国实用外科杂志,2006,26(9):673-675.
6
张成,克力木,汪忠镐.食管裂孔病合并胃食管反流病的外科治疗[J].临床外科杂志,2014(9):644-646.
7
王春赛尔,谢鹏雁.食管裂孔疝的发病机制及诊断方法[J].中国医刊,2015(1):26-31.
8
吕宾.胃食管反流病发病机制的研究进展[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2008,13(1):27-30.
9
Du X, Hu Z, Yan C,et al.A meta-analysis of long follow-up outcomes of laparoscopic Nissen(total)versusToupet(270°)fundoplication for gastro-esophageal reflux disease based on randomized controlled trials in adults[J].BMC Gastroenterol,2016,16(1):88.
10
Mello MD, Shriver AR, Li Y,et al.Ineffective esophageal motility phenotypes following fundoplication in gastroesophageal reflux disease[J].Neurogastroenterol Motil.2016,28(2):292-298.
11
Limpert PA, Naunheim KS.Partial versus complete fundoplication:is there a correct answer?[J].Surg Clin North Am,2005,85(3):399-410.
12
Erenoğlu C, Miller A, Schirmer B.Laparoscopic Toupet versus Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J].Int Surg,2003,88(4):219-225.
[1] 夏效泳, 王立超, 朱治国, 丛云海, 史宗新. 深度塌陷性胫骨平台骨折的形态特点和治疗策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 625-632.
[2] 李世红, 侯康. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝补片修补术联合胃底折叠术(Nissen)[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 365-365.
[3] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[4] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[5] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[6] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[7] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[8] 宋钰, 赵阳, 王惠君, 廖新华. 术前BMI与可切除胃癌患者术后远期生存的关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 530-533.
[9] 汪毅, 许思哲, 任章霞. 胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 542-545.
[10] 陈俊宇, 崔宇. TAPP治疗腹股沟嵌顿疝的临床分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 546-549.
[11] 赵新亮, 荆克杰, 樊红艳, 王妮, 葸根. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片与腹腔内补片治疗两侧下腹壁切口疝的临床对比观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 554-557.
[12] 惠立良, 王成果, 段东峰, 王健. 腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术治疗胰体尾部良性肿瘤及部分交界性肿瘤的临床效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 558-561.
[13] 李雪, 刘文婷, 窦丽婷, 刘叶红. 联合护理在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 750-754.
[14] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[15] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
阅读次数
全文


摘要