切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (01) : 35 -39. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2017.01.009

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜Toupet和Dor胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病的疗效对比分析
王志1, 郑坚江2, 克力木1,(), 苏福增1, 李义亮1, 张成1, 祝志开1, 李松1   
  1. 1. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创、疝和腹壁外科;830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创研究所
    2. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院胰腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-06 出版日期:2017-02-15
  • 通信作者: 克力木

A clinical comparison between the operating methods of Laparoscopic Toupet and Dor fundoplication for treating the hiatal hernia combined with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Zhi Wang1, Jianjiang Zheng2, Le-mu KE1,(), Fuzeng Su1, Yiliang Li1, Cheng Zhang1, Zhikai Zhu1, Song Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernia and abdominal wall Surgery, Xinjiang Provincial People Hospital, Urumuqi 830001, China; Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernia and abdominal wall Surgery, Xinjiang Provincial People Hospital, Urumuqi 830001, China
    2. Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernia and abdominal wall Surgery, Xinjiang Provincial People Hospital, Urumuqi 830001, China
  • Received:2016-12-06 Published:2017-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Le-mu KE
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: KE Le-mu, Email:
引用本文:

王志, 郑坚江, 克力木, 苏福增, 李义亮, 张成, 祝志开, 李松. 腹腔镜Toupet和Dor胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病的疗效对比分析[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2017, 04(01): 35-39.

Zhi Wang, Jianjiang Zheng, Le-mu KE, Fuzeng Su, Yiliang Li, Cheng Zhang, Zhikai Zhu, Song Li. A clinical comparison between the operating methods of Laparoscopic Toupet and Dor fundoplication for treating the hiatal hernia combined with gastroesophageal reflux disease[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2017, 04(01): 35-39.

目的

探讨腹腔镜下Toupet和Dor胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝(HH)合并胃食管反流病(GERD)的临床疗效及其优缺点。

方法

回顾性分析2014年12月~2017年1月,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院收治的127例食管裂孔疝(HH)合并胃食管反流病(GERD)患者的病案资料,比较两组患者术前及术后6个月24 h食管pH监测、食管测压、GERD Q量表评分数据及术中术后恢复情况等。

结果

2组患者术后反流症状均明显改善(均P<0.05),但Dor组在减少反流次数和抑制长反流上均优于Toupet组,差异有统计学意义[反流次数:(14.36±10.58)次vs.(29.83±19.71)次,t=7.382,P=0.007;长反流次数:(0.64±0.21)次vs.(6.20±3.48)次,t=10.816,P=0.001]。2组术后食管下括约肌压力、残余压均明显升高,松弛率明显降低,Gerd Q量表评分明显降低,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),Dor组在食管下括约肌压力(静息呼吸平均值)的恢复上优于Toupet组[(20.69±13.95)mmHg vs.(12.91±6.89)mmHg,t=4.586,P=0.031],但Toupet组术后无效吞咽较术前有所增加,且高于Dor组,差异有统计学意义[(9.15±6.44)%比(11.25±2.04)%,t=4.104,P=0.033]。2组手术时间、术中出血量、住院天数比较均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。术后随访时间6~18个月(中位数12个月),Toupet组有1例(2.4%)复发,Dor组有1例(1.2%)复发,术后并发症比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=4.362,P=0.359)。

结论

2种胃底折叠术治疗HH合并GERD均安全、有效,但腹腔镜下Dor胃底折叠术在减少反流次数、抑制长反流、提高食管下括约肌压力(静息呼吸平均值)方面均优于Toupet胃底折叠术,但Toupet胃底折叠术较Dor胃底折叠术更易发生术后吞咽困难。

Objective

To comparison the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic Toupet and Dor fundoplication in the treatment of hiatal hernia combined with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Methods

Statistics Analysis 127 patients of GERD in our hospital from December 2014 to January 2017, 41 underwent laparoscopic laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication(Toupet Group).86patients underwent laparoscopic laparoscopic Dor fundoplication(Dor Group). Comparing the GerdQ rating scale scores, intraoperative and postoperative recovery and so on the between patients with esophageal reflux conditions, esophageal manometry in three groups.

Results

Two groups of patients were improved significantly compared with preoperative in reflux conditions(P<0.05). Dor group was better than Toupet group in reducing the number of reflux episodes and suppressed the long-reflux, the difference was statistically significant[the number of reflux episodes: (14.36±10.58)vs.(29.83±19.71), t=7.382, P=0.007, the long-reflux: (0.64±0.21)vs.(6.20±3.48), t=10.816, P=0.001]. The postoperative esophageal sphincter pressure and residual pressure increased significantly, the rate of relaxation and GerdQ Q scores reducted significantly compared with preoperative, the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05, for all). Dor group was better than Toupet group in recovery lower esophageal sphincter pressure(mean resting breathing)[(20.69±13.95)mmHg vs.(12.91±6.89)mmHg, t=4.586, P=0.031]. But, the ineffective swallowing was increase in Toupet group compared with the preoperative, the difference was statistically significant[(9.15±6.44)%: (11.25±2.04)%, t=4.104, P=0.033]. There was no significant difference in operative time, blood loss, hospital stay and complications(P>0.05). We followed up these patients for 6~18 months(median 12 months). 6~18 months(median 12 months). There was no significant difference in recurrence[Toupet group: 1case(2.44%), Dor group: 1case(1.12%), χ2=0.292, P=0.589]. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications(χ2=4.362, P=0.359).

Conclusion

It was safe and feasible for this two fundoplications treating HH combined with GERD.But laparoscopicDor fundoplication was better than Toupet fundoplication in reducing the number of reflux episodes and suppressed the long-reflux and increase LES pressure(mean resting respiration)and the incidence of postoperative dysphagia.

表1 2组患者基线资料比较
图2 Dor式胃底折叠术
表2 2组患者术前及术后6个月24 h食管pH监测结果比较
表3 2组患者术前及术后6个月食管测压及Gerd Q量表评分比较
表4 住院天数、手术时间、术中出血量及术后并发症比较
1
Roman C,Bruley des Varannes S,Muresan L.Atrial fibrillation in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease:a comprehensive review[J].World J Gastroenterol,2014,20(28):9592-9596.
2
Kavic SM,Segan RD,George IM.Classification of hiatal hernias using dynamic three-dimensional reconstruction[J].Surgical innovation,2006,13(1):49-52.
3
Hutter MM,Rattner DW.Paraesophageal and other complex diaphragmatic hernias.[M]∥Yeo CJ(ed)Shackelford′s Surgery of the Alimentary Tract Saunders Elsevier,Philadelphia Saunders,2007:549-562.
4
张成,李俊生,克力木,等.2013年美国胃肠内镜外科医师协会食管裂孔疝诊疗指南解读(一)[J/CD].中华胃食管反流病电子杂志,2015,2(1):6-9.
5
张泰昌.食管裂孔疝的内镜诊断[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2004,21(5):293-296.
6
高红雷,孙作成,徐文广,等.混合型食管裂孔疝的诊断与外科治疗[J/CD].中华胃食管反流病电子杂志,2014,1(1):58-60.
7
季锋,汪忠镐,李震,等.高分辨率食管测压法在食管裂孔疝诊断中的意义[J].中华普通外科杂志,2013,18(6):427-430.
8
Mello M,Gyawali CP.Esophageal manometry in gastroesophageal reflux disease [J].Gastroenterol Clin North Am,2014,43(1):69-87.
9
克力木,张成,牛伟亚.腹腔镜下Toupet胃底折叠术治疗食道裂孔疝的临床应用[J].国际外科学杂志,2009,36(9):594-597.
10
张成,克力木,汪忠镐.食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病的外科治疗[J].临床外科杂志,2014,(9):644-646.
11
Kim GH.How to interpret Ambulatory 24hr Esophageal PH Monitoring[J].J Neurogastroenterol Motil,2010,16(2):207-210.
12
Barrett NR.Hiatus hernia:a review of some controversial points[J].Br J Surg,1954,42(173):231-243.
13
Nissen R.Gastropexy as the lone procedure in the surgical repair of hiatus hernia[J].Am J Surg,1956,92(3):389-392.
14
Dallemagne,Weerts JM,Jehaes C.Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication:preliminary report[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc,1991,1(3):138-143.
15
克力木,张成,汪忠镐,等.胃食管反流病与食管裂孔疝外科临床研究现状与争议[J/CD].中华胃食管反流病电子杂志,2014,1(1)4-6.
16
杨玉兵,王耿泽,张海洋,等.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝[J].中国普通外科杂志,2014,23(12):1730-1732.
17
郑朝旭,袁凯涛,陈流华,等.腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病安全性的Meta分析[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献:电子版,2009,3(5):434-437.
18
张成,克力木,牛伟亚,等.腹腔镜下胃底Nissen折叠术式治疗的食道裂孔疝临床应用[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2010,4(1):53-56.
19
王志,苏福增,张成,等.腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病的疗效分析[J].中国医师杂志,2016,18(8):1172-1175.
20
Hoshino M,Omura N,Yano F,et al.Backflow prevention mechanism of laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication using high-resolution manometry[J].Surg Endosc. 2016,30(7):2703-2710.
21
苏福增,张成,克力木,等.腹腔镜Nissen、Toupet和Dor胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病的疗效对比分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2016,19(9):1014-1020.
[1] 王雅楠, 刘丹, 曹正浓, 贾慧敏. 儿童迟发性先天性膈疝患儿的临床诊治特点分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 410-419.
[2] 李海云, 赵敏娴, 申英末, 杨慧琪. 胃底折叠术预防食管裂孔疝术后并发症的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 485-490.
[3] 仝聪, 周哲琦, 阎立昆. 食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病治疗现状及与胃食管结合部肿瘤的关系[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 491-493.
[4] 王浩, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 李义亮, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 不同检查方法对巨大食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病的诊断价值及各检查指标间的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 494-500.
[5] 玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.
[6] 任传富, 杨志, 徐恩, 何梓芸, 罗板鑫, 陈新, 夏雪峰. 腹腔镜疝修补术联合胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病40 例临床分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 507-511.
[7] 李义亮, 苏拉依曼·牙库甫, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合Nissen 胃底折叠术短期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 512-517.
[8] 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 王浩, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 短食管型食管裂孔疝临床特点及疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 518-522.
[9] 杜晨阳, 王勇, 段鑫, 柯文杰, 石念, 武英翔, 罗文. 腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术后吞咽困难的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 523-527.
[10] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[11] 姜然, 张海泳. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术患者围手术期手术配合的精细化管理与应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 584-587.
[12] 刘明昊, 李晨, 王冰, 万政, 田文. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术对比研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 376-382.
[13] 胡志伟, 吴继敏, 汪忠镐, 张美光. 胃食管反流病食管外症状抗反流手术适应证及术前评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 241-246.
[14] 胡志伟, 吴继敏, 邓昌荣, 战秀岚, 纪涛, 王峰, 田书瑞, 陈冬, 张玉, 刘健男, 宋庆. 抗反流黏膜套扎治疗顽固性胃食管反流病[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 227-233.
[15] 唐小久, 胡曼, 许必君, 肖亚. 肥胖合并胃食管反流病患者严重程度与其焦虑抑郁及营养状态的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 360-364.
阅读次数
全文


摘要