切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (02) : 52 -55. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2017.02.002

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

论著

腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术54例临床疗效分析
张振松1, 贺跃1, 张学军1, 吴秀华1, 李东印2,()   
  1. 1. 301700 天津市武清区人民医院胸外科
    2. 300192 天津市第一中心医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-16 出版日期:2017-05-15
  • 通信作者: 李东印
  • 基金资助:
    天津市武清区科技发展计划项目(WQKJ201434)

Experience of 54 cases of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and fundoplication

Zhensong Zhang1, Yue He1, Xuejun Zhang1, Xiuhua Wu1, Dongyin Li2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The People′s Hospital of Wuqing Tianjin, Tianjin 301700, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, Tianjin first Center Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China
  • Received:2017-02-16 Published:2017-05-15
  • Corresponding author: Dongyin Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Dongyin, Email:
引用本文:

张振松, 贺跃, 张学军, 吴秀华, 李东印. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术54例临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2017, 04(02): 52-55.

Zhensong Zhang, Yue He, Xuejun Zhang, Xiuhua Wu, Dongyin Li. Experience of 54 cases of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and fundoplication[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2017, 04(02): 52-55.

目的

探讨腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2012年1月至2016年1月,天津市第一中心医院普外科收治的胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术的54例患者临床资料,通过对其手术时间,术中出血量,术后住院天数及出现的术后并发症来评价腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术治疗效果。

结果

53例(98%)患者行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术治疗,1例(2%)因与脾脏粘连,分离困难,中转开腹;其中应用补片患者47例(87%),未用补片7例(13%);行Toupet、Nissen、Dor术的患者分别为32例(59.3%)、19例(35.2%)、3例(5.5%);手术时间95~355 min,平均手术时间(193.6±87.6)min,术中出血量为10~600 ml,平均出血量(72.5±21.3)ml;53例患者术后住院天数3~18 d,1例患者术后62 d出院,平均(8.1±7.4)d,术后3 d拔除胃管;术后并发症中,消化道瘘1例(Nissen术),经持续胃肠减压及腹腔引流10 d后好转,吞咽困难1例(Nissen术),恶心、反流2例(Toupet术),保守治疗1周后好转;随访3年,失访12例,余42例患者症状完全缓解。

结论

对于胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝患者,腹腔镜疝修补联合胃底折叠术是一种安全、有效的治疗方法。

Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair in combination of fundoplication in treating patients with reflux esophagitis and hiatal hernia.

Methods

Retrospective analysis ofthe clinical data of 54 patients with reflux esophagitis and hiatal hernia under laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair in combination of fundoplication admitted from January 2012 to January 2016.In aspects of the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization days and complications to evaluate the treatment effect of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair combined fundoplication.

Results

There were 53(98%)patients underwent the laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and fundoplication.One case converted tolaparotomy.47(87%)patients used mesh repair while others did not.The number of patients who did the operation of Toupet, Nissen, Dor(gastric folding degree were 270°, 360°, 180°respectively)were 32(59.3%), 19(35.2%)and 3(5.5%). Operation time was 95~355 minutes, average time(193.6±87.6)minutes.Intra-operative blood loss was 10~600 ml, average blood loss(72.5±21.3)ml; the average postoperative hospitalization stay was(8.1±7.4)days, 53 patients′postoperative hospitalization stay were 3~18 days, one was 62 days.The extubation time was 3 days after operation.The complication included: One case with digestive fistula(Nissen), who recovered in 10 days after the continuous gastrointestinal decompression and peritoneal drainage.One case had the symptom of difficulty swallowing and 2 cases(Toupet)with sickness and reflux, with conservative treatment, they recovered in 1 week.In 3 years following up, 12 patients lost access and 42 patients had complete remission.

Conclusion

For reflux esophagitis and hiatal hernia patients, laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and fundoplication is a safe and effective treatment method.

表1 本组患者一般资料
1
张逊.胃食管返流性病外科治疗的进展[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(22):1582-1584.
2
Valenzuela GA, Dickinson D.Prevalence of hiatal hernia in symptomatic GERD by high resolution manometry and endoscopy[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2010,71(5):AB268.
3
曾荣耀,刘静.Barrett食管的危险因素及治疗进展[J].中华消化外科杂志,2013,12(10):807-810.
4
俞德梁,刘小南,赵青川,等.食管裂孔疝的外科治疗进展[J].医学与哲学,2014,35(12):47-51.
5
胡志伟,汪忠镐,吴继敏,等.胃食管反流病:胃食管气道反流的多学科研究和实践[J/CD].中华胃食管反流病电子杂志,2015,2(3):165-170.
6
Niebisch S, Peters JH.Update on fundoplication for the treatment of GERD[J].Curr Gastroenterol Rep,2012,14(3):189-196.
7
Dallemagne B, PerrettaS.Twenty years of laparoscopic fundoplication for GRED[J].World J Surg,2011,35(7):1428-1435.
8
张成,克力木,汪忠镐.食管裂孔疝合并食管反流病的外科治疗[J].临床外科杂志,2014,22(9):644-646.
9
赵凯,李朝霞,黄涛,等.食管裂孔疝的腹腔镜治疗进展[J].世界华人消化杂志2016,24(14):2178-2183.
10
Richter JE.Gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment:side effects and complications of fundoplication[J].Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol,2013,11(5):465-471.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?