切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (03) : 131 -134. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2019.03.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

持续均匀性肠内营养支持对胃食管反流患者免疫功能及短期转归的影响
刘菁1, 范旻1, 王志2,()   
  1. 1. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院临床营养研究所
    2. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新维吾尔自治区人民医院微创、疝和壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-25 出版日期:2019-08-15
  • 通信作者: 王志

The effect of continuous homogeneity enteral nutrition support on immune function and short-term outcome in patients with gastroesophageal reflux

Liujing1, Wangzhi1, Fanmin.2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Research institute of clinical Nutriology, Xinjiang People's Hospital, Urmuqi 830001, China
    2. Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery & Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Xinjiang People's Hospital, Urmuqi 830001, China
  • Received:2018-12-25 Published:2019-08-15
  • Corresponding author: Fanmin.
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Zhi, Email:
引用本文:

刘菁, 范旻, 王志. 持续均匀性肠内营养支持对胃食管反流患者免疫功能及短期转归的影响[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2019, 06(03): 131-134.

Liujing, Wangzhi, Fanmin.. The effect of continuous homogeneity enteral nutrition support on immune function and short-term outcome in patients with gastroesophageal reflux[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2019, 06(03): 131-134.

目的

研究持续性肠内营养支持对胃食管反流病患者免疫功能和短期转归的影响。

方法

纳入90例胃食管反流病患者作为研究对象,随机抽签分为两组,每组各45例。两组均行奥美拉唑治疗,观察组行持续性泵入肠内营养液干预,对照组行常规鼻饲干预。比较两组患者免疫功能、营养状态及治疗后短期转归。

结果

观察组治疗后CD3<+和CD4<+显著高于对照组,CD8<+显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗前后CD4<+/CD8<+比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组治疗后反流次数、反流时间、pH<4时间、LESP及LESL水平均显著低于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组治疗后反流次数和反流时间显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组治疗后营养状态显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组食管反流发生率显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

持续均匀性肠内营养支持有助于改善胃食管反流病患者免疫功能,较传统定期鼻饲干预治疗效果更好。

Objective

To study the effect of continuous homogeneity enteral nutrition support on immune function and short-term outcome in patients with gastroesophageal reflux.

Methods

90 cases of gastroesophageal reflux disease were included in the study and were divided into two groups by random draw, 45 cases in each group.The two groups were treated with omepr3333azole,the observation group were received the intervention of continuous pumping enteral nutrient solution,the control group were received the routine nasal feeding intervention.The immune function, nutritional status and short-term outcome after treatment were compared between the two groups.

Results

The CD3<+ and CD4<+ in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group,the CD8<+ was significantly lower than that of the control group,the difference were statistically significant (P<0.05).There were no significant difference in the difference between the two groups of the CD4<+/CD8<+ before and after treatment (P>0.05).The reflux times, reflux numbers, pH<4 time, LESP and LESL levels of the two groups after treatment were significantly lower than those before treatment (P<0.05).The reflux times and reflux numbers after treatment in the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05).The nutritional status of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The rate of esophageal reflux in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The continuous homogeneity of enteral nutrition support can improve the immune function of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, and the effect is better than that of traditional regular nasal feeding.

表1 两组患者免疫功能比较
表2 两组营养状态比较 [n(%)]
表3 两组患者相关临床指标比较
1
程亚平.胃食管反流病患者营养状况调查及护理体会[J]. 临床消化病杂志, 2014, 26(5): 305-306.
2
Toporowskakowalska E, G&Eogonborakowalska B, Fendler W, et al. Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux and anti-reflux procedures among polish children with gastrostomies: a 10-year nationwide analysis[J]. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2013, 67(11): 1169-74.
3
Corvaglia L, Martini S, Aceti A, et al. Cardiorespiratory events with bolus versus continuous enteral feeding in healthy preterm infants[J]. Journal of Pediatrics, 2014, 165(6): 1255-7.
4
欧阳斐, 许涛, 万敏, 等.重症患者行肠内营养致食管梗阻原因分析及防范措施[J]. 中国急救医学, 2015, 35(s2): 185-186.
5
中华医学会消化病学分会. 2014年中国胃食管反流病专家共识意见[J]. 胃肠病学, 2015, 34(3): 155-168.
6
吴晓娜, 黄承钰, 邓波.应用微型营养评价精法评价老年住院病人的营养状况[J]. 肠外与肠内营养, 2015, 22(6): 359-361.
7
克力木·阿不都热依木, 张成, 汪忠镐.胃食管反流病与食管裂孔疝外科临床研究现状与争议[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2014, 1(1): 4-6.
8
吕孟菊, 王艳冬.胃食管反流病人无创性肠内营养护理进展[J]. 全科护理, 2017, 15(21): 2591-2593.
9
Gale S C, Shanker B A, Coyle S M, et al. Continuous enteral and parenteral feeding each reduce heart rate variability but differentially influence monocyte gene expression in humans[J]. Shock, 2012, 38(3): 255-261.
10
潘宇, 吴伦清, 陆光成.谷氨酰胺膳食纤维和低聚果糖在老年机械通气患者肠内营养中的应用[J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2016, 35(1): 42-45.
11
李薇薇, 归淑华, 叶红波, 等.经鼻肠管置管行肠内营养在预防呼吸机相关性肺炎中的作用[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2015, 9(3): 615-617.
12
Lubbers T, Kox M, de Haan J J, et al. Continuous administration of enteral lipid- and protein-rich nutrition limits inflammation in a human endotoxemia model. [J]. Critical Care Medicine, 2013, 41(5): 1258-65.
13
李小好, 尚桂莲, 周志斌, 等.早期免疫肠内营养支持对重症脑卒中患者营养状况和免疫功能以及预后的影响[J]. 中国全科医学, 2012, 15(26): 3006-3008.
[1] 杜彦斌, 黄涛, 寇天阔, 石英. 双镜联合根治术与腹腔镜根治术在早期结肠癌患者中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 275-278.
[2] 邢益民, 张天飞, 戴慧勇. 胃肠充盈超声造影检查在反酸、嗳气患者临床诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 303-306.
[3] 李海云, 赵敏娴, 申英末, 杨慧琪. 胃底折叠术预防食管裂孔疝术后并发症的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 485-490.
[4] 玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.
[5] 任传富, 杨志, 徐恩, 何梓芸, 罗板鑫, 陈新, 夏雪峰. 腹腔镜疝修补术联合胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病40 例临床分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 507-511.
[6] 胡志伟, 吴继敏, 汪忠镐, 张美光. 胃食管反流病食管外症状抗反流手术适应证及术前评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 241-246.
[7] 刘春军, 严方方, 王宝锋, 常婷婷, 郭红红, 李志强. 替加环素联合人免疫球蛋白治疗XDRAB致VAP 的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 797-800.
[8] 胡志伟, 吴继敏, 邓昌荣, 战秀岚, 纪涛, 王峰, 田书瑞, 陈冬, 张玉, 刘健男, 宋庆. 抗反流黏膜套扎治疗顽固性胃食管反流病[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 227-233.
[9] 龚财芳, 赵俊宇, 游川. 围手术期肠内营养在肝癌肝切除患者中有效性及安全性的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 551-556.
[10] 宋燕秋, 戚桂艳, 杨双双, 周萍. 重症急性胰腺炎肠道菌群特征及早期肠内营养联合微生态制剂治疗的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 442-447.
[11] 唐小久, 胡曼, 许必君, 肖亚. 肥胖合并胃食管反流病患者严重程度与其焦虑抑郁及营养状态的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 360-364.
[12] 张静, 白亦冰, 来要良, 刘永, 和媛媛, 苏敏. 不同体位对胃食管反流病患者食管高分辨率测压的影响[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 115-120.
[13] 张靖, 柏君, 陈玉盟, 张鹏, 侯芳芳, 王军芳, 孙静, 赵士博, 杨喆, 张玥, 张瑞芳, 朱宏斌. 抗反流黏膜消融术治疗胃食管反流病患者的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 121-125.
[14] 华丽, 仲卫冬, 胡根, 张丽英, 邵国益. 手术治疗胃食管反流病对患者生活质量和心理状态影响的研究[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 126-129.
[15] 文明, 张丽, 谢芳, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 构建胃食管反流病患者发生心房颤动的临床预测模型[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 130-136.
阅读次数
全文


摘要