切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (03) : 172 -176. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2020.03.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

胃食管反流相关性慢性咳嗽并咽喉反流患者的反流特征
阿里木·买买提1, 陶发明1, 祖里培亚·艾拜都拉2, 吴朝阳1, 克力木·阿不都热依木3,()   
  1. 1. 830001乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院急诊创伤外科
    2. 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院呼吸与危重症医学中心
    3. 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创,疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-07 出版日期:2020-08-15
  • 通信作者: 克力木·阿不都热依木
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(2018D01C134)

Analysis of reflux characteristics in patients with gastroesophageal reflux associated chronic cough and laryngopharyngeal reflux

Alimu·Maimaiti1, Faming Tao1, Zulipeiya·Aibaidoula2, Zhaoyang Wu1, Kelimu·Abudureyimu3,()   

  1. 1. Derartment of Emergency and TraumaticSurgery
    2. Department of Respiratory Medicine
    3. Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830001, China.
  • Received:2019-11-07 Published:2020-08-15
  • Corresponding author: Kelimu·Abudureyimu
引用本文:

阿里木·买买提, 陶发明, 祖里培亚·艾拜都拉, 吴朝阳, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 胃食管反流相关性慢性咳嗽并咽喉反流患者的反流特征[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2020, 07(03): 172-176.

Alimu·Maimaiti, Faming Tao, Zulipeiya·Aibaidoula, Zhaoyang Wu, Kelimu·Abudureyimu. Analysis of reflux characteristics in patients with gastroesophageal reflux associated chronic cough and laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2020, 07(03): 172-176.

目的

探讨胃食管反流相关性慢性咳嗽(GERC)并伴喉咽反流(LPR)患者的反流特征。

方法

选取2019年1月至2019年6月间在新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院住院收治的60例慢性咳嗽患者。对所有患者进行反流症状指数(RSI)问卷调查,分析咳嗽症状评分以及高分辨率食管测压和24 h pH监测。

结果

按照食管24 h pH监测反流次数、酸暴露时间百分比及DeMeester评分,对患者进一步分为非酸性GERC组(n=32)和酸性GERC组(n=28)。在非酸性GERC组中,RSI评分25.00(8.00)显著高于酸性GERC组16.00(6.50),且差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.105,P<0.05)。此外,非酸性GERC患者的“持续清嗓”和“呼吸困难或窒息发作”比酸性GERC患者更明显。

结论

LPR与GERC部分重叠,RSI评分较高的非酸性GERC患者可能表现出更多的非酸性反流和呼吸困难。

Objective

To investigate the characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux associated chronic cough (GERC) with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

Methods

According to the criteria of inclusion, exclusion and diagnosis, a total of 60 patients with chronic cough who were hospitalized in the people's Hospital from January 2019 to June 2019 were selected as the study group, and the refluxsymptom index (RSI) questionnaire survey, cough symptom score, high-resolution esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring were conducted to analyze reflux characteristics.

Results

After analysis of 24 h pH monitoring, the number of reflux, the percentage of acid exposure time and DeMeester score the patients were further divided into two groups: non acid GERC group (n=32) and acidic GERC group (n=28). In non acid GERC group, the RSI score was significantly higher than that of acid GERCgroup [25.00 (8.00) vs 16.00 (6.50); Z=-3.105, P=0.001]. In addition, the scores of "continuous voice clearing" and "dyspnea or asphyxia attack" in non acid GERC patients were more significant than those in acidicGERC patients.

Conclusion

The patients with LPR and GERC was partially overlapped, and the patients with higher RSI may show more non acid reflux and dyspnea.

表1 反流症状指数量表
表2 慢性咳嗽患者的一般临床特点
表3 慢性咳嗽患者酸反流分析结果
表4 两组患者食管动力学指标比较(
xˉ
±s
表5 酸性和非酸性GERC患者RSI评分的比较
1
克力木·阿不都热依木,张成,汪忠镐. 胃食管反流病与食管裂孔疝外科临床研究现状与争议[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志,2014,1(1):4-6.
2
Özdemir P, Erdinç M, Vardar R, et al. The Role of Microaspiration in the Pathogenesis of Gastroesophageal Reflux-related Chronic Cough[J]. Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility, 2017, 23(1 ):41-48.
3
Yu Y, Wen S, Wang S, et al. Reflux characteristics in patients with gastroesophageal reflux-related chronic cough complicated by laryngopharyngeal reflux[J].Ann Transl Med, 2019, 7(20):529.
4
Kahrilas PJ, Altman KW, Chang AB, et al. Chronic Cough Due to Gastroesophageal Reflux in Adults: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report[J]. Chest, 2016, 150:1341-1360.
5
李进让. 咽喉反流性疾病规范化诊断和治疗[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2015,51(9):435-437.
6
Lai K, Chen R, Lin J, et al. A prospective, multicenter survey on causes of chronic cough in China[J]. Chest, 2013, 143:613-620.
7
王巍,孙艳玲,邢丽芬,等. 酸反流与异常非酸反流性胃食管反流性咳嗽症状与诊断的临床比较[J]. 世界华人消化杂志,2014,22(18):2583-2587.
8
Brauer DL, Tse KY, Lin JC, et al. The Utility of the Reflux Symptom Index for Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in an Allergy Patient Population[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 2018, 6:132-138.
9
Yang J, Dehom S, Sanders S, et al. Treating laryngopharyngeal reflux: Evaluation of an antireflux program with comparison to medications[J]. Am J Otolaryngol, 2018, 39:50-55.
10
Spyridoulias A, Lillie S, Vyas A, et al. Detecting laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with upper airways symptoms: Symptoms, signs or salivary pepsin? [J].Respir Med, 2015, 109:963-939.
11
汤玉茗,黄佳,朱颖,等. 唾液胃蛋白酶检测无症状人群胃食管反流的应用价值[J]. 内科理论与实践,2019,13(4):235-238.
12
Dy F, Amirault J, Mitchell PD, et al. Salivary Pepsin Lacks Sensitivity as a Diagnostic Tool to Evaluate Extraesophageal Reflux Disease[J]. J Pediatr, 2016, 177:53-58.
13
Wang J, Zhao Y, Ren J, et al. Pepsin in saliva as a diagnostic biomarker in laryngopharyngeal reflux: a metaanalysis[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2018, 275:671-678.
14
Shilpa C, Sandeep S, Chandresh S,et al. Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and GERD: Correlation Between Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux Finding Score[J]. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2019, 71(Suppl 1): 684-688.
15
赵倩倩,尚占民,刘子雨,等. 无效食管动力及非酸反流与胃食管反流性咳嗽的关系[J]. 临床消化病杂志,2018,30(4):205-209.
16
王嘉森,李进让,吴慕坤. 胃蛋白酶试纸条检测诊断咽喉反流性疾病的可行性分析[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2019,54(7):501-505.
17
Johnston N, Yan JC, Hoekzema CR, et al. Pepsin promotes proliferation of laryngeal and pharyngeal epithelial cells[J]. Laryngoscope, 2012, 122:1317-1325.
18
Johnston N , Dettmar PW , Ondrey FG, et al. Pepsin: biomarker, mediator, and therapeutic target for reflux and aspiration[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2018, 1434(1): 282-289.
[1] 李艳, 刘蓉, 余静, 谢丽, 邓琳凡, 董金蓉. 绵阳地区儿童慢性咳嗽的病因构成特点[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2014, 10(01): 94-96.
[2] 余静, 李艳, 刘蓉, 谢坚. 人工支气管激发试验可靠性的研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2012, 08(05): 600-602.
[3] 李艳, 余静, 刘蓉, 谢坚. 人工支气管激发试验在儿童慢性咳嗽诊断中的应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2012, 08(04): 474-475.
[4] 杨飏, 沈俊. 491例儿童慢性咳嗽病因及其临床特征分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 542-544.
[5] 李江华, 李力, 何勇. 呼出气一氧化氮的研究进展[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(01): 119-122.
[6] 赖克方, 易芳, 向科衡. 慢性咳嗽临床诊断及治疗的新理念[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(06): 705-710.
[7] 李春华, 龚先明, 关向阳, 彭永燕. 潮气呼出气一氧化氮检测婴幼儿慢性咳嗽及喘息性疾病诊断中的临床意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(01): 68-70.
[8] 夏建珍. 慢性咳嗽经验性治疗在社区医院的疗效观察[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(12): 926-929.
[9] 陆洪鹏, 袁芯, 郑树灏, 刘怡, 徐磊. 慢性咳嗽与胃食管反流病:双向两样本孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 59-64.
[10] 史冬梅, 陈程. 唾液胃蛋白酶测定对于咽喉反流疾病的临床意义[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2021, 08(02): 61-64.
阅读次数
全文


摘要