慢性咳嗽与胃食管反流病：双向两样本孟德尔随机化研究

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2023.02.001

目的

利用孟德尔随机化分析来探索胃食管反流病（GERD）是否与慢性咳嗽存在因果关系。

方法

从两个公开的全基因组关联研究数据库（GWAS）中提取了与慢性咳嗽强烈相关的工具变量，并从欧洲分子生物学实验室数据库中提取了与GERD强烈相关的工具变量。主要采用逆方差加权法来评估慢性咳嗽与GERD之间的因果关系。

结果

发现GERD会增加慢性咳嗽发生的风险，两者存在因果关系（OR=1.03, P=1.70×10⁻⁷；OR=1.03, P=2.42×10⁻⁵）；然而，慢性咳嗽与GERD发生风险无相关性（P>0.05）。并且未观察到显著的多效性和异质性。

结论

GERD会增加慢性咳嗽的发生风险。

关键词: 胃食管反流病, 慢性咳嗽, 孟德尔随机化

Objective

Mendelian randomization was used to explore whether there is a causal relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and chronic cough.

Methods

We extracted independent genetic variants strongly associated with chronic cough from two published genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and summary statistics for GERD from a GWAS analysis in the European Molecular Biology Laboratory. The causal relationship between chronic cough and GERD was assessed using inverse variance weighted (IVW) as main estimation.

Results

GERD was observed for causal association with increased risk for chronic cough for IVW analysis for applying two GWAS data (P=1.70×10⁻⁷ and P=2.42×10⁻⁵, respectively). However, there was no association of genetically predicted chronic cough with GERD (all P>0.05). None evidence of significant pleiotropy and heterogeneity was observed.

Conclusion

There was a causal relationship between GERD and increased risk of chronic cough.

Key words: Gastroesophageal reflux disease, Chronic cough, Mendelian randomization

图1 孟德尔随机化流程图注：GERD为胃食管反流病

表1 欧洲个体中GERD和慢性咳嗽之间关系的双样本孟德尔随机效应结果

暴露	结局	MR	SNP数	OR (95%CI)	P 值
胃食管反流病	慢性咳嗽	IVW	88 ^a	1.03 (1.02~1.04)	1.70×10^-7
		MR Egger	88^a	0.99 (0.93~1.06)	0.87
		Weighted median	88^a	1.03 (1.02~1.05)	2.42×10^-5
		Weighted mode	88^a	1.04 (1.00~1.07)	0.06
		Simple mode	88^a	1.04 (1.00~1.08)	0.07
		IVW	86^b	1.28 (1.13~1.44)	8.88×10^-5
		MR Egger	86^b	0.62 (0.30~1.28)	0.20
		Weighted median	86^b	1.29 (1.07~1.54)	7.28×10^-3
		Weighted mode	86^b	1.35 (0.87~2.07)	0.18
		Simple mode	86^b	1.42 (0.90~2.22)	0.13
慢性咳嗽	胃食管反流病	IVW	7^a	1.76 (0.70~4.43)	0.23
		MR Egger	7^a	0.42 (0.01~13.34)	0.64
		Weighted median	7^a	1.13 (0.60~2.13)	0.75
		Weighted mode	7^a	1.11 (0.54~2.27)	0.78
		Simple mode	7^a	1.14 (0.55~2.36)	0.74
		IVW	2^b	1.03 (0.96~1.11)	0.45

表1 欧洲个体中GERD和慢性咳嗽之间关系的双样本孟德尔随机效应结果

暴露	结局	MR	SNP数	OR (95%CI)	P 值
胃食管反流病	慢性咳嗽	IVW	88 ^a	1.03 (1.02~1.04)	1.70×10^-7
		MR Egger	88^a	0.99 (0.93~1.06)	0.87
		Weighted median	88^a	1.03 (1.02~1.05)	2.42×10^-5
		Weighted mode	88^a	1.04 (1.00~1.07)	0.06
		Simple mode	88^a	1.04 (1.00~1.08)	0.07
		IVW	86^b	1.28 (1.13~1.44)	8.88×10^-5
		MR Egger	86^b	0.62 (0.30~1.28)	0.20
		Weighted median	86^b	1.29 (1.07~1.54)	7.28×10^-3
		Weighted mode	86^b	1.35 (0.87~2.07)	0.18
		Simple mode	86^b	1.42 (0.90~2.22)	0.13
慢性咳嗽	胃食管反流病	IVW	7^a	1.76 (0.70~4.43)	0.23
		MR Egger	7^a	0.42 (0.01~13.34)	0.64
		Weighted median	7^a	1.13 (0.60~2.13)	0.75
		Weighted mode	7^a	1.11 (0.54~2.27)	0.78
		Simple mode	7^a	1.14 (0.55~2.36)	0.74
		IVW	2^b	1.03 (0.96~1.11)	0.45

图2 各数据库中GERD对慢性咳嗽效应的MR分析散点图注：X轴表示来自不同结果数据库与慢性咳嗽相关的工具变量，Y轴表示与GERD相关的工具变量。黑点表示工具变量对MR分析产生的效应。GERD为胃食管反流病；MR为孟德尔随机化；SNP为单核苷酸多态性

1	Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, et al. The montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2006, 101(8): 1900-1920.
2	Niimi A. Cough associated with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD): Japanese experience[J]. Pulm Pharmacol Ther, 2017, 47: 59-65.
3	Ding H, Xu X, Wen S, et al. Changing etiological frequency of chronic cough in a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(8): 3482-3489.
4	El-Serag H, Hill C, Jones R. Systematic review: the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care, using the UK General Practice Research Database[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2009, 29(5): 470-480.
5	Kahrilas PJ, Smith JA, Dicpinigaitis PV. A causal relationship between cough and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been established: a pro/con debate[J]. Lung, 2014, 192(1): 39-46.
6	Griffiths TL, Nassar M, Soubani AO. Pulmonary manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Expert Rev Respir Med, 2020, 14(8): 767-775.
7	Landt EM, Çolak Y, Nordestgaard BG, et al. Risk and impact of chronic cough in obese individuals from the general population[J]. Thorax, 2022, 77(3): 223-230.
8	Theodoropoulos DS, Pecoraro DL, Efstratiadis SE. The association of gastroesophageal reflux disease with asthma and chronic cough in the adult[J]. Am J Respir Med, 2002, 1(2): 133-146.
9	Ribolsi M, de Carlo G, Balestrieri P, et al. Understanding the relationship between esophageal motor disorders and reflux disease[J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 14(10): 933-940.
10	Özdemir P, Erdinç M, Vardar R, et al. The role of microaspiration in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux-related chronic cough[J]. J Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2017, 23(1): 41-48.
11	Li X, Lin S, Wang Z, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and chronic cough: a possible mechanism elucidated by ambulatory pH-impedance-pressure monitoring[J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2019, 31(12): e13707.
12	Javorkova N, Varechova S, Pecova R, et al. Acidification of the oesophagus acutely increases the cough sensitivity in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux and chronic cough[J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2008, 20(2): 119-124.
13	Qiu Z, Yu L, Xu S, et al. Cough reflex sensitivity and airway inflammation in patients with chronic cough due to non-acid gastro-oesophageal reflux[J]. Respirology, 2011, 16(4): 645-652.
14	Aben-Athar CG, Dantas RO. Primary and secondary esophageal contractions in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Braz J Med Biol Res, 2006, 39(8): 1027-1031.
15	Becher A, El-Serag H. Systematic review: the association between symptomatic response to proton pump inhibitors and health-related quality of life in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2011, 34(6): 618-627.

[1]	陈跃圻, 罗睿, 向涵, 余泳妍, 余挺. 骨质疏松症与牙周炎的因果关系：一项两样本孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 292-298.
[2]	贾卓奇, 周维茹, 张勇, 张广健, 付军科. 达·芬奇机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的对比研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 410-414.
[3]	毛宁, 徐文婷, 朱勇. 孟德尔随机化探索雄性激素水平与肛周脓肿的关系[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 490-494.
[4]	王宁, 刘彦哲, 吴紫莺, 曾超, 雷光华, 沙婷婷, 王伊伦. 基于孟德尔随机化研究探讨肠道菌群与肌少症表型的因果关联[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 333-342.
[5]	王擎, 王冠峰, 陈星. 胃食管阀瓣的Hill分级在胃食管反流病中的应用价值[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 125-130.
[6]	张继舜, 陈思旭, 钱洁, 尚占民, 郝建宇. 平均夜间基线阻抗对食管外症状胃食管反流病的临床诊断价值[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 97-102.
[7]	范勇, 张利昉, 杨美琳. 改良经口内镜下贲门缩窄术治疗胃食管反流病效果分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 65-68.
[8]	文明, 熊英, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 质子泵抑制剂治疗期间焦虑对胃食管反流病疗效的影响[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 90-95.
[9]	李鹏, 刘国祥, 李汝红. 经口内镜下贲门缩窄术治疗胃食管反流病的研究进展[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 96-99.
[10]	买买提·依斯热依力, 尹强, 尹海龙, 董雨微, 王永康, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 阿吉艾克拜尔·艾萨. 传统医药治疗胃食管反流病的研究进展[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 100-104.
[11]	李赞林, 马建惠, 王志. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术对胃食管反流病疗效的系统评价与分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 22-30.
[12]	张高松, 杨美琳, 袁莉, 俞炎波, 石琳妮. 内镜下贲门缩窄术对改善胃食管反流病患者生活质量的观察[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 18-21.
[13]	张晓贝, 王伟刚, 李晓龙, 易风俊, 俞永江. 幽门螺旋杆菌感染与不同亚型胃食管反流病的相关性[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 1-5.
[14]	闫晶, 蒋媛, 买买提·依斯热依力, 王俭, 王永康, 阿巴伯克力·乌斯曼, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 膈肌生物反馈训练对胃食管反流病的效果分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 50-55.
[15]	伍振鹏, 乔钰涵, 向林, 江云颂, 彭居正, 吴丽娜, 程吕佳, 关炳生, 庄子康, 杨景哥. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中胃窦切缘与幽门的距离对术后胃食管反流病及减重效果的影响[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 4-11.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Chronic cough and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Chronic cough and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study