切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (02) : 72 -80. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2016.02.006

所属专题: 文献

循证医学

经腹腔镜Nissen与Toupet胃底折叠术治疗GERD前瞻性随机对照研究的Meta分析
卡哈尔·吐尔孙1, 艾克拜尔·艾力2, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明3, 买买提吐尔逊·吐尔迪4, 克力木·阿不都热依木2,()   
  1. 1. 830000 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学研究生学院;844000 喀什,喀什地区第一人民医院普外二科;新疆自治区人民医院GERD研究中心
    2. 830000 乌鲁木齐,新疆自治区人民医院微创疝和腹壁外科;新疆自治区人民医院GERD研究中心
    3. 830000 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学研究生学院;830000 乌鲁木齐,新疆自治区人民医院微创疝和腹壁外科;新疆自治区人民医院GERD研究中心
    4. 844000 喀什,喀什地区第一人民医院普外二科
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-06 出版日期:2016-05-15
  • 通信作者: 克力木·阿不都热依木

Meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet Fundoplication in GERD therapy

Tuerxun Kahaer·1, Aili Aikebaier·2, Maimaitiming Maimaitiaili·3, Tuerdi Maimaitituerxun·4, Abudoureyimu Kelimu·2,()   

  1. 1. Postgraduate College of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, China; the Second Division of General Surgery, the First People′s Hospital of Kashi, Kashi 844000, China; Research Center of GERD, People′s Hospital of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830000, China
    2. Department of Minimally Invasive Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People′s Hospital of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830000, China; Research Center of GERD, People′s Hospital of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830000, China
    3. Postgraduate College of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, China; Department of Minimally Invasive Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People′s Hospital of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830000, China; Research Center of GERD, People′s Hospital of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830000, China
    4. the Second Division of General Surgery, the First People′s Hospital of Kashi, Kashi 844000, China
  • Received:2016-02-06 Published:2016-05-15
  • Corresponding author: Abudoureyimu Kelimu·
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Kelimu·Abudoureyimu, Email:
引用本文:

卡哈尔·吐尔孙, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 买买提吐尔逊·吐尔迪, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 经腹腔镜Nissen与Toupet胃底折叠术治疗GERD前瞻性随机对照研究的Meta分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2016, 03(02): 72-80.

Tuerxun Kahaer·, Aili Aikebaier·, Maimaitiming Maimaitiaili·, Tuerdi Maimaitituerxun·, Abudoureyimu Kelimu·. Meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet Fundoplication in GERD therapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2016, 03(02): 72-80.

目的

系统评价腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术(LNF)与腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术(LTF)治疗胃食管反流疾病(gastroesophageal reflux disease,GERD)的价值和意义。

方法

计算机检索Cochrane图书馆(2015年第二期);PubMed(1978~2016);Embase(1966.1~2016.5);CMB(1978.1~2016.5);VIP(1989.1~2016.5);CNKI(1989.1~2016.5);OVID(2006~2016.5)。查阅文章后所附的参考文献及手工检索相关杂志及会议论文集中未发表的文献。

结果

纳入10个随机对照试验,共1 468例患者,试验组(LNF)769例,对照组(LTF)701例。结果显示LNF与LTF治疗GERD的疗效,手术时间差异无统计学意义(P=0.09);术后6个月和1年吞咽困难、胃灼热、腹胀、胸痛发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后DeMeester评分差异有统计学意义(P=0.007);术后6个月和2年食管反流发生率差异无统计学意义(P=0.77)。

结论

现有有限证据表明如果把握好手术适应症,运用LNF较LTF治疗GERD并不缩短手术时间,术后6个月、1年吞咽困难、胃灼热、腹胀、胸痛发生率和2年食管反流病的复发率无明显差异。术后DeMeester评分LNF组明显低于LTF组,但反流症状无明显差异。

Objective

To evaluate the value and significance of laparoscopicnissen fundoplication(LNF)and laparoscopictoupetfundoplication(LTF)in thetreatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD).

Methods

This paper searched the Cochrane library(issue 2, 2015); PubMed(1978 to 2016); Embase(1966.1 to 2016.5); CMB(1978.1 to 2016.5); VIP(1989.1 to 2016.5); CNKI(1989.1 to 2016.5); OVID(2006 to 2016.5)as well as hand searched several related journals and conference proceedings for the randomized controlled trials involving the comparison of the efficacy of the LNF versus LTF in patients with GERD.

Results

10 studies involving 1 468 patients were identified studies(LNF: 769, LTF: 701). When comparing LNF with LTF for thetreatment of GERD, LNF versus LTF showed no statistical difference in operation time(P=0.09). No statistical difference in 6-month and 1-year postoperative dysphagia, heartburn, abdominal distention, and thoracrodynia(P>0.05). It showed astatistical difference in postoperative DeMeester score(P=0.007). There was no statistical difference in 6-month and 2-year postoperative regurgitation(P=0.77).

Conclusion

The limited evidence suggested that if indications of surgery were graspedwell, the operation time was not shortenedby using LNF compared with LTF for the treatment of GERD.There was no significant difference after LNF or LTF in 6-month or 1-yearincidence of dysphagia, heartburn, abdominal distention, thoracodynia, and 2-year incidence of GERD recurrence rate.DeMeester score was significantly lower than that of LTF patients, but there was no significant difference in reflux symptoms.

表1 纳入研究的特征(例)
表2 纳入研究的质量评价
图1 LNF与LTF治疗GERD手术时间的Meta分析(min)
图2 LNF与LTF治疗GERD术后6个月、1年吞咽困难发生情况的Meta分析
图3 LNF与LTF治疗GERD术后6个月、1年胃灼热发生情况的Meta分析
图4 LNF与LTF治疗GERD术后6个月、1年腹胀发生情况的Meta分析
图5 LNF与LTF治疗GERD术后6个月、1年胸骨后疼痛发生情况的Meta分析
图6 LNF与LTF治疗GERD术后食管24-h pH值监测DeMeester的Meta分析
图7 LNF与LTF治疗GERD术后6个月、2年食管反流发生情况的Meta分析
1
E-serag HB, Sweet S, Winchester CC,etal.date on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease:a systematic review[J].Gut,2014,63(6):871-880.
2
屈坤鹏,成晓舟,我国部分地区GERD患病率的Meta分析[J/CD].中华胃食管反流病电子杂志,2015,2(1):34-44.
3
Hunter JG, Swanstrom L, Waring JP.Dysphagia after laparoscopic antirefluxsurgery.The impact of operative technique[J].AnnSurg,1996,224(1):51-57.
4
Owers C.Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatus hernia:overview and authors′ perspective[J].J Surg,2013,1(4):51-58.
5
Worrell SG, Greene CL, Demeester TR.Thestate of surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease after five decades[J].J Am Coll Surg,2014,219(4):819-830.
6
吴泰相,刘关键.隐藏分组(分配隐藏)和盲法的概念,实施与报告[J].中国实用外科杂志,2001,21(8):494-495.
7
HigginisJPT, Green S,editors.Cohrane Handbook for systimatic Review Intervention4.2.6[M/OL].Chichester,UK:John Wiley&Sons.Ltd,2006.
8
Alderson P, Green S, Higginis JPT.CohraneReviewS′Handbook 4.2.1[M/OL].Chichester,UK:John Wiley&Sons.Ltd,2004.
9
Mickevičius A, Endzinas Z, Kiudelis M,et al.Influence of wrap length on the effectiveness of Nissen and Toupetfundoplications:5-year results of prospective,randomized study[J].Surg Endosc,2013,27(3):986-991.
10
Fibbe C, Layer P, Keller J,et al.Esophageal motility in reflux disease before and after fundoplication:a prospective,randomized,clinical,andmanometric study[J].Gastroenterology,2001,121(121):5-14.
11
Mickevi A, Endzinas I, Kiudelis M,et al.Influence of wrap length on the effectiveness of Nissen and Toupet fundoplication:a prospective randomized study[J].Surg Endosc,2008,22(10):2269-2276.
12
Strate U, Emmermann A, Fibbe C,et al.Laparoscopic fundoplication:Nissen versus Toupet two-year outcome of a prospective randomized study of 200 patients regarding preoperative esophageal motility[J].Surg Endosc,2008,22(1):21-30.
13
Koch OO, Kaindlstorfer A, Antoniou SA,et al.Comparison of results from a randomized trial 1 year after laparoscopic Nissen and Toupetfundoplications[J].Surg Endosc,2013,27(7):2383-2390.
14
Laws HL, Clements RH, Swillie CM.A randomized,prospective comparison of the Nissen fundoplication versus the Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease[J].Ann Surg,1997,225(6):647-653.
15
Zornig C, Strate U, Fibbe C,et al.Nissenvstoupet laparoscopic fundoplication:A prospective randomized study of 200 patients with and without preoperative esophageal motility disorders[J].Surg Endosc,2002,16(5):758-766.
16
Shaw JM, Bornman PC, Callanan MD,et al.Long-term outcome of laparoscopic Nissen and laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease:a prospective,randomized trial[J].Surg Endosc,2010,24(4):924-932.
17
Guérin E, Bétroune K, Closset J,et al.Nissen versus Toupet fundoplication:Results of a randomized and multicenter trial[J].SurgEndosc,2007,21(11):1985-1990.
18
Chrysos E, Tsiaoussis J, Zoras OJ,et al.Laparoscopic surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with impaired esophageal peristalsis:total or partial fundoplication?[J].J Am Coll Surg,2003,197(1):8-15.
19
Mucio M, Rojano M, Herrera JJ,et al.Novel surgical concept in antireflux surgery:Long-term outcomes comparing 3 different laparoscopic approaches[J].Surgery,2012,151(151):84-93.
20
Booth MI, Stratford J, Jones L,et al.Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic total(Nissen)versus posterior partial(Toupet)fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease based on preoperative oesophagealmanometry[J].Br J Surg,2008,95(1):57-63.
21
Qin M, Ding G, Yang H.A clinical comparison of laparoscopic nissen and toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease[J].J LaparoendoscAdvSurg Tech A,2013,23(7):601-604.
22
Koch OO, Kaindlstorfer A, Antoniou SA,et al.LaparoscopicNissen versus Toupet fundoplication:objective and subjective results of a prospective randomized trial[J].Surg Endosc,2012,26(26):413-422.
23
Wang B, Zhang W, Liu S,et al.A Chinese randomized prospective trial of floppy nissen and toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal disease[J].Int J Surg,2015,23(Pt A):35-40.
24
Tian Z C, Wang B, Shan C X,et al.Ameta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare long-term outcomes of nissen and toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease[J].Plos One,2014,10(6):e0127627.
25
Shan CX, Zhang W, Zheng XM,et al.Evidence-based appraisal in laparoscopic Nissen and Toupetfundoplications for gastroesophageal reflux disease[J].World J Gastroenterol,2010,16(24):3063-3071.
26
Tan G, Yang Z, Wang Z.Meta-analysis of laparoscopic total(Nissen)versus posterior(Toupet)fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease based on randomized clinical trials[J].Anz J Surg,2011,81(4):246-252.
27
Rantanen TK, Salo JA, Salminen JT,et al.Functional outcome after laparoscopic or open Nissen fundoplication:a follow-up study[J].Arch Surg,1999,134(3):240-244.
[1] 杨薇, 郝霞, 朱冬振, 张劲柏, 田雪飞, 姚斌. 中医药治疗烧烫伤患者临床效果的荟萃分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 419-426.
[2] 杨广宇, 王璐, 王宇, 张驰, 曾俊, 江华, 孙明伟. 静脉补充Omega-3多不饱和脂肪酸对脓毒症患者临床结局影响的系统评价与荟萃分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(02): 148-156.
[3] 李世红, 侯康. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝补片修补术联合胃底折叠术(Nissen)[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 365-365.
[4] 王鸿彬, 何晓, 吴菁宙. 腹腔镜近端胃切除术中背驮式间置空肠单通道重建术在AEG手术的安全性及抗反流效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 526-529.
[5] 赵国栋, 施喆, 孙树刚, 薛亮, 王晓辉, 杨勇. 两种消化道重建方案的腹腔镜近端胃切除术后患者胃内压变化的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 292-295.
[6] 贾卓奇, 周维茹, 张勇, 张广健, 付军科. 达·芬奇机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的对比研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 410-414.
[7] 王秀, 王义国. 乌司奴单抗治疗克罗恩病肛周瘘管的有效性和安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 514-519.
[8] 张继舜, 陈思旭, 钱洁, 尚占民, 郝建宇. 平均夜间基线阻抗对食管外症状胃食管反流病的临床诊断价值[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 97-102.
[9] 吕昆明, 王沙沙, 万军, 令狐恩强. 胃食管反流病与特发性肺纤维化关系的研究进展[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 121-124.
[10] 王擎, 王冠峰, 陈星. 胃食管阀瓣的Hill分级在胃食管反流病中的应用价值[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 125-130.
[11] 陆洪鹏, 袁芯, 郑树灏, 刘怡, 徐磊. 慢性咳嗽与胃食管反流病:双向两样本孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 59-64.
[12] 范勇, 张利昉, 杨美琳. 改良经口内镜下贲门缩窄术治疗胃食管反流病效果分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 65-68.
[13] 文明, 熊英, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 质子泵抑制剂治疗期间焦虑对胃食管反流病疗效的影响[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 90-95.
[14] 李鹏, 刘国祥, 李汝红. 经口内镜下贲门缩窄术治疗胃食管反流病的研究进展[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 96-99.
[15] 闫文貌, 孙海涛, 白日星. 胃袖状切除相关术式中应重视胃窦部解剖与生理功能[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 161-164.
阅读次数
全文


摘要