切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (01) : 42 -45. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2021.01.008

综述

质子泵抑制剂治疗胃食管反流病的研究进展
李丹1, 聂占国2,()   
  1. 1. 832000 石河子大学医学院;830000 乌鲁木齐,新疆军区总医院消化内科
    2. 832000 石河子大学医学院
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-20 出版日期:2021-02-15
  • 通信作者: 聂占国

Research progress of proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Dan Li1, Zhanguo Nie2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Xinjiang Military Region Urumqi 830000, China; Department of Shihezi University School of Medicine 832003, China
    2. Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Xinjiang Military Region Urumqi 830000, China
  • Received:2020-09-20 Published:2021-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Zhanguo Nie
引用本文:

李丹, 聂占国. 质子泵抑制剂治疗胃食管反流病的研究进展[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2021, 08(01): 42-45.

Dan Li, Zhanguo Nie. Research progress of proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2021, 08(01): 42-45.

胃食管反流病(GERD)是消化系统最常见疾病之一,其发病机制及临床表现复杂多样,临床治愈率低、复发率高,严重影响患者生心健康,加重家庭经济负担及社会医疗资源的耗费,是消化系统疾病中较为顽固的治疗难题之一。GERD的治疗包括心理及生活方式干预、标准药物治疗、内镜和必要时的外科手术治疗等,但目前药物治疗仍是首选。质子泵抑制剂(PPI)是目前临床应用最广、疗效较好的一类强抑酸药,本文就PPI在GERD中的研究进展做一综述。

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common diseases of the digestive system. Its pathogenesis and clinical manifestations are complex and diverse, with a low clinical cure rate and a high recurrence rate, which seriously affect the quality of patients'health and increase family finances Burden and consumption of social medical resources are one of the more stubborn treatment problems in digestive system diseases. The treatment of GERD includes psychological and lifestyle intervention, standard medical treatment, endoscopy and surgical treatment if necessary, but drug treatment is still the first choice. Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPI) are currently the most widely used clinically effective class of strong acid inhibitors. This article reviews the research progress of PPI in GERD.

1
Vakil N, Van Zanten S, Kahrilas P, et al. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus [J]. The American journal of gastroenterology, 2006, 101(8): 1900-1920; quiz 43.
2
屈坤鹏,成晓舟. 我国部分地区胃食管反流病患病率的 Meta 分析 [J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2015, 2(1):34-44.
3
Fock K, Talley N, Goh K, et al. Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: an update focusing on refractory reflux disease and Barretts oesophagus [J]. Gut, 2016, 65(9): 1402-1415.
4
Hagymási K, Müllner K, Herszényi L, et al. Update on the pharmacogenomics of proton pump inhibitors [J]. Pharmacogenomics, 2011, 12(6): 873-88.
5
孙玮,何彩霞. CYP2C19基因型与奥美拉唑治疗消化道溃疡疗效的相关性 [J]. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志, 2019, 22(7):198.
6
吕秋菊,蒲强红. CYP2C19基因多态性对质子泵抑制剂治疗胃食管反流病疗效影响的Meta分析 [J]. 基层医学论坛, 2016, 20(28):3918-3920.
7
Uno T, Niioka T, Hayakari M, et al. Absolute bioavailability and metabolism of omeprazole in relation to CYP2C19 genotypes following single intravenous and oral administrations [J]. European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2007, 63(2): 143-149.
8
周陈西,刘孟娟. 奥美拉唑的合理应用 [J]. 中国药房,2011(8):762-763.
9
秦怡男. 质子泵抑制药治疗胃食管反流病患者的研究进展 [J]. 医疗装备, 2019(14): 186-187.
10
徐涛. 国内常见质子泵抑制剂的简单对比分析 [J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2015(12): 257-258.
11
鄢小华,林常誉,林文英. 质子泵抑制剂在治疗胃食管反流中的临床效果观察 [J]. 临床合理用药杂志, 2018(4):88-90.
12
Kinoshita Y, Ishimura N, Ishihara S. Management of GERD: Are Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers Superior to Proton Pump Inhibitors? [J]. The American journal of gastroenterology, 2018, 113(10): 1417-1419.
13
Graham D, Dore M. Update on the Use of Vonoprazan: A Competitive Acid Blocker [J]. Gastroenterology, 2018, 154(3): 462-466.
14
Li W, Yang Y, Tian Y, et al. Preparation and in vitro/in vivo evaluation of revaprazan hydrochloride nanosuspension [J]. International journal of pharmaceutics, 2011(408):157-162.
15
陆慧, 陈祥峰. 胃酸相关疾病治疗新药富马酸沃拉赞 [J]. 药学与临床研究, 2016, (5):395-398.
16
Xiao Y, Zhang S, Dai N, et al. Phase Ⅲ, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan compared with lansoprazole in Asian patients with erosive oesophagitis [J]. Gut, 2020, 69(2): 224-230.
17
Miyazaki H, Igarashi A, Takeuchi T, et al. Vonoprazan versus proton-pump inhibitors for healing gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review [J]. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2019, 34(8): 1316-1328.
18
Miwa H, Igarashi A, Teng L, et al. Systematic review with network meta-analysis: indirect comparison of the efficacy of vonoprazan and proton-pump inhibitors for maintenance treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. Journal of gastroenterology, 2019, 54(8): 718-729.
19
Echizen H. The First-in-Class Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker, Vonoprazan Fumarate: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations [J]. Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2016, 55(4): 409-418.
20
黄群刚, 朱启华, 徐云根. 可逆型质子泵抑制剂新研究进 [J]. 药学进展, 2016(6):445-452.
21
马莉娜. 常用质子泵抑制剂的临床应用及不良反应 [J]. 养生保健指南, 2019(36):70.
22
中华医学会,中华医学会杂志社,中华医学会消化病学分会,等. 胃食管反流病基层诊疗指南(2019年) [J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2019(7):635-641.
23
Iwakiri K, Kinoshita Y, Habu Y, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2015 [J]. Journal of gastroenterology, 2016, 51(8): 751-767.
24
Kinoshita Y, Kato M, Fujishiro M, et al. Efficacy and safety of twice-daily rabeprazole maintenance therapy for patients with reflux esophagitis refractory to standard once-daily proton pump inhibitor: the Japan-based EXTEND study [J]. Journal of gastroenterology, 2018, 53(7): 834-844.
25
Johnson D, Katz P, Armstrong D, et al. The Safety of Appropriate Use of Over-the-Counter Proton Pump Inhibitors: An Evidence-Based Review and Delphi Consensus [J]. Drugs, 2017, 77(5): 547-561.
26
Haastrup P, Thompson W, Søndergaard J, et al. Side Effects of Long-Term Proton Pump Inhibitor Use: A Review [J]. Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2018, 123(2): 114-121.
27
冯军安. 不同疗程奥美拉唑治疗胃食管反流病的临床疗效比较 [J]. 中国民康医学, 2018(6):59-60.
28
苏德云. 胃食管反流病给予不同疗程奥美拉唑治疗的对比分析 [J]. 中外医疗, 2019(15):131-133.
29
徐晓军, 江雅峰. 奥美拉唑不同疗程治疗胃食管反流病的疗效观察 [J]. 中国药房, 2014(20):1870-1872.
30
吴雄健, 毛忠懿, 刘洪荣. 不同疗程的质子泵抑制剂对胃食管反流病的疗效分析 [J]. 中国医药科学, 2012(23):82+84.
31
Hsu P, Lu C, Wu D, et al. Eight weeks of esomeprazole therapy reduces symptom relapse, compared with 4 weeks, in patients with Los Angeles grade A or B erosive esophagitis [J]. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2015, 13(5): 859-866.
[1] 黄泽, 张梓榆, 杨青宇, 赖声清, 李海燕. 乳腺腔镜手术临床应用现状及训练路径[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 122-125.
[2] 叶啟发. 生物人工肝血液净化材料研究现状[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 0-.
[3] 贾卓奇, 周维茹, 张勇, 张广健, 付军科. 达·芬奇机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的对比研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 410-414.
[4] 李亮, 洪楚原, 李明哲, 郝腾飞, Chongkuo Zi. 胃食管结合部抗反流机制探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 6-8.
[5] 袁久莉, 刘丹, 李林藜, 刘晋宇. 毛囊间充质干细胞的基础研究及临床应用[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 189-192.
[6] 佘重阳, 卢弘. Janus激酶抑制剂在幼年特发性关节炎相关葡萄膜炎治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 104-108.
[7] 吴绍伟. 迷走神经电刺激术治疗神经系统疾病的应用进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 180-184.
[8] 张继舜, 陈思旭, 钱洁, 尚占民, 郝建宇. 平均夜间基线阻抗对食管外症状胃食管反流病的临床诊断价值[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 97-102.
[9] 王擎, 王冠峰, 陈星. 胃食管阀瓣的Hill分级在胃食管反流病中的应用价值[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 125-130.
[10] 陆洪鹏, 袁芯, 郑树灏, 刘怡, 徐磊. 慢性咳嗽与胃食管反流病:双向两样本孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 59-64.
[11] 范勇, 张利昉, 杨美琳. 改良经口内镜下贲门缩窄术治疗胃食管反流病效果分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 65-68.
[12] 文明, 熊英, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 质子泵抑制剂治疗期间焦虑对胃食管反流病疗效的影响[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 90-95.
[13] 李鹏, 刘国祥, 李汝红. 经口内镜下贲门缩窄术治疗胃食管反流病的研究进展[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 96-99.
[14] 买买提·依斯热依力, 尹强, 尹海龙, 董雨微, 王永康, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 阿吉艾克拜尔·艾萨. 传统医药治疗胃食管反流病的研究进展[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 100-104.
[15] 张晓贝, 王伟刚, 李晓龙, 易风俊, 俞永江. 幽门螺旋杆菌感染与不同亚型胃食管反流病的相关性[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 1-5.
阅读次数
全文


摘要