The influences of family-centered nursing mode on children with bronchial asthma and gastroesophageal reflux disease

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2019.02.008

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To explore the effect of family-centered nursing mode on children with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and bronchial asthma.

Methods

A total of fifty eight children with GERD combined with bronchial asthma in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People's Hospital from April 2016 to May 2017 were selected. All cases were randomly divided into experimental group (29 cases) and control group (29 cases). The control group was given a routine nursing mode, while the experimental group carried out a family-centered nursing mode. Then, the effect of that two different mode were compared.

Results

The day of disappearance of symptoms such as wheezing, cough and asthma and the day of discharge in the experimental group were significantly shorter than control group [(3.6 ± 1.5) d vs (5.8±2.2) d, t=4.579, P<0.001; (3.4±1.7) d vs (5.0±2.8) d, t=2.670, P=0.010; (4.0±0.9) vs (6.1±2.1) d, t=5.102, P<0.001; (5.0±2.2) d vs (9.0±3.5) d, t=5.226, P<0.001]. The satisfaction with nursing mode in experimental group was significantly higher than control group [93.1%(27/29) vs 72.4%(21/29), χ²=4.350, P=0.037]. Quality of life score of the experimental group in 1, 3, and 6 months after discharge were significantly higher than control group [(70.3 ± 5.5) scores vs (60.1 ± 4.8) scores, (82.1 ± 4.9) scores vs (71.3 ± 3.8) scores, (90.1 ± 3.7) scores vs (79.8 ± 4.2) scores; t=7.563, 9.457, 9.814, all P<0.001] respectively.

Conclusion

The family-centered nursing mode can significantly improves the treating efficacy in children who suffering GERD and bronchial asthma, by shortening the symptom disappear time and improving the quality of life.

Key words: Family, Center, Bronchial asthma, Gastroesophageal reflux disease

Yunxian Cheng, Wusiman Amina, Lihong Zhu. The influences of family-centered nursing mode on children with bronchial asthma and gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2019, 06(02): 82-86.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhwsgflbdzzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2019.02.008

https://zhwsgflbdzzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2019/V06/I02/82

Figures/Tables 4

References 14

1	刘教春，郑林，詹志刚，等. 24 h动态pH监测在支气管哮喘合并胃食管反流病的临床研究[J]．临床肺科杂志, 2016, 21(9): 1642-1646.
2	Fujimoto Y, Hasegawa S, Matsushige T, et al. Pulmonary inflammation and cytokine dynamics of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from a mouse model of bronchial asthma during A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza infection [J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 9128.
3	Valero-Moreno S, Pérez-Marín M, Montoya-Castilla I, et al. Emotional distress in family caregivers of adolescents with bronchial asthma: analysis of its predictors [J]. Arch Argent Pediatr, 2018, 116(2): e234-e240.
4	袁媛，卜平．胃食管反流病中医治疗与护理的研究进展[J]．中华现代护理杂志, 2016, 22(13): 1915-1917.
5	Lalu JS, Rakesh PS, Leelamoni K. Prevalence of bronchial asthma and factors associated with it among higher secondary school children in Ernakulam district, Kerala, Southern India [J]. J Family Med Prim Care, 2017, 6(2): 311-315.
6	Devault KR, Ocastell D，蔡联英，等．胃食管反流病诊断和治疗的最新指南[J]．广西医学, 2005, 27(8): 1297-1298.
7	Jing X, Zhu YT, Wang GZ, et al. The PPARγ agonist, rosiglitazone, attenuates airway inflammation and remodeling via heme oxygenase-1 in murine model of asthma [J]. Acta Pharmacol Sin, 2015, 36(2): 171-178.
8	Nath A, Khan A, Hashim Z, et al. Prevalence of Aspergillus hypersensitivity and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in patients with bronchial asthma at a tertiary care center in North India [J]. Lung India, 2017, 34(2): 150-154.
9	钟月英．全程护理干预在支气管哮喘儿童雾化吸入治疗中的应用[J]．实用临床医药杂志, 2016, 20(6): 123-125.
10	Starczewska-Dymek L, Bozek A, Jakalski M. The Usefulness of the Forced Oscillation Technique in the Diagnosis of Bronchial Asthma in Children [J]. Can Respir J, 2018: 7519592.
11	Hamawandi AMH, Ali KM, Naji AZ. Assessment of Asthma Control and Severity among Children According to Global Initiative for Asthma Guidelines in Sulaimani City-Iraq [J]. Plasma Sci Technol, 2016, 14(5): 375-378.
12	Wu SH, Chen XQ, Kong X, et al. Characteristics of respiratory syncytial virus-induced bronchiolitis co-infection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and add-on therapy with montelukast [J]. World J Pediatr, 2016, 12(1): 88-95.
13	Tajti G, Papp C, Kardos L, et al. Positive correlation of airway resistance and serum asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) in bronchial asthma patients lacking evidence for systemic inflammation [J]. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol, 2018, 14(1): 2.
14	曾鹂，孔晓丽，向晶，等．胃食管反流病患者应用个体化护理干预的临床效果及对生命质量的影响[J]．现代消化及介入诊疗, 2016, 21(2): 249-251.

组别	例数	年龄（岁，±s）	性别（例，男性/女性）	身高（cm，±s）	体质量（kg，±s）
研究组	29	7.9±1.6	15/14	120.3±2.5	25.2±2.5
对照组	29	8.0±1.7	16/13	119.8±3.0	24.7±2.7
检验值	?	t=0.282	χ²=0.069	t=0.704	t=0.724
P值	?	0.779	0.792	0.484	0.472

组别	例数	年龄（岁，±s）	性别（例，男性/女性）	身高（cm，±s）	体质量（kg，±s）
研究组	29	7.9±1.6	15/14	120.3±2.5	25.2±2.5
对照组	29	8.0±1.7	16/13	119.8±3.0	24.7±2.7
检验值	?	t=0.282	χ²=0.069	t=0.704	t=0.724
P值	?	0.779	0.792	0.484	0.472

组别	例数	满意（例）	基本满意（例）	不满意（例）	总满意率［%（例/例）］
研究组	29	20	7	2	93.1（27/29）
对照组	29	10	11	8	72.4（21/29）
χ²值	?	?	?	?	4.350
P值	?	?	?	?	0.037

组别	例数	满意（例）	基本满意（例）	不满意（例）	总满意率［%（例/例）］
研究组	29	20	7	2	93.1（27/29）
对照组	29	10	11	8	72.4（21/29）
χ²值	?	?	?	?	4.350
P值	?	?	?	?	0.037

组别	例数	出院后1个月	出院后3个月	出院后6个月
研究组	29	70.3±5.5	82.1±4.9	90.1±3.7
对照组	29	60.1±4.8	71.3±3.8	79.8±4.2
t值	?	7.563	9.457	9.814
P值	?	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export