切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (02) : 101 -105. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2019.02.012

所属专题: 文献

综述

综述食管pH-阻抗监测在临床中的应用
马志凤1, 杨杰2,()   
  1. 1. 550025 贵阳,贵州医科大学
    2. 550004 贵阳,贵州医科大学附属医院消化科
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-19 出版日期:2019-05-15
  • 通信作者: 杨杰

Clinical application of esophageal pH-impedance monitoring

Zhifeng Ma1, Jie Yang2,()   

  1. 1. Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550025, China
    2. Department of Digestive, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China
  • Received:2018-10-19 Published:2019-05-15
  • Corresponding author: Jie Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Jie, Email:
引用本文:

马志凤, 杨杰. 综述食管pH-阻抗监测在临床中的应用[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2019, 06(02): 101-105.

Zhifeng Ma, Jie Yang. Clinical application of esophageal pH-impedance monitoring[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2019, 06(02): 101-105.

食管pH-阻抗监测通过记录食管腔内食团通过所引起的阻抗变化反应食团的性质及运动情况。弥补了食管pH监测、无线pH胶囊检测不能检测到弱酸、非酸反流的弱点,从而提高了检测反流事件的灵敏度,增加了反流检测的价值。食管pH-阻抗监测在某些情况下允许不停用抑酸药的情况下进行监测。传统的指标,如酸暴露时间、DeMeester评分在诊断胃食管反流病(GERD),特别是以酸反流为主的胃食管反流病中是主要指标。但食管pH-阻抗监测提高了反流症状关联、反流事件的检出率,提高了GERD的检出灵敏度。新的基于阻抗的指标如:反流后吞咽诱导蠕动波指数和食管基线阻抗提高了pH-阻抗监测在难治性胃食管反流病、功能性胃灼热、反流高敏感和GERD相关食管外症状等的临床诊断价值。本文描述了食管pH-阻抗监测在临床中应用,以期更好的利用食管pH-阻抗监测辅助诊断食管疾病。

Esophageal pH-resistance monitoring reflects the nature and movement of the bolus by recording the impedance changes caused by the passage of the bolus in the esophageal lumen. It compensates for the weak point of weak acid and non-acid reflux caused by esophageal pH monitoring and wireless pH capsule detection, which improves the sensitivity of detecting reflux events and increases the value of reflux detection. Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring can be monitored without deactivating proton pump inhibitors in some cases. Traditional indicators such as acid exposure time and DeMeester score are the main indicators in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), especially in gastroesophageal reflux disease with acid reflux. However, esophageal pH-impedance monitoring improves the detection rate of reflux-related symptoms and reflux events, and improves the detection sensitivity of GERD. New impedance-based indicators such as: postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave and esophageal baseline impedance improve pH-impedance monitoring in refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease, functional heartburn, reflux high sensitivity, and GERD-related extra-esophageal symptoms Clinical diagnostic value, This article describes the clinical application of esophageal pH-impedance monitoring in order to better use esophageal pH-impedance monitoring to assist in the diagnosis of esophageal diseases.

1
Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, et al. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2006, 101(8): 1900-1920; quiz 1943.
2
中华医学会病理学分会消化疾病学组筹备组.胃食管反流病、Barrett食管和食管胃交界腺癌病理诊断共识[J].中华病理学杂志, 2017, 46(2): 79-83.
3
Frazzoni M, Manta R, Mirante VG, et al. Esophageal chemical clearance is impaired in gastro-esophageal reflux disease--a 24-h impedance-pH monitoring assessment [J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2013, 25(5): 399-406, e295.
4
Patel A, Sayuk GS, Gyawali CP. Parameters on esophageal pH- impedance monitoring that predict outcomes of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2015, 13(5): 884-891.
5
Roman S, Gyawali CP, Savarino E, et al. Ambulatory reflux monitoring for diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: Update of the Porto consensus and recommendations from an international consensus group [J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2017, 29(10): 1-15.
6
Zerbib F, Roman S, Ropert A, et al. Esophageal pH-Impedance monitoring and symptom analysis in GERD: A study in patients off and on therapy [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2006, 101(9): 1956-1963.
7
Savarino E, Marabotto E, Zentilin P, et al. The added value of impedance-pH monitoring to rome III criteria in distinguishing functional heartburn from non-erosive reflux disease [J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2011, 43(7): 542-547.
8
Shafik A, El-Sibai O, Shafik AA, et al. Effect of topical esophageal acidification on salivary secretion: identification of the mechanism of action [J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 200, 20(12): 1935-1939.
9
Martinucci I, De BN, Savarino E, et al. Esophageal baseline impedance levels in patients with pathophysiological characteristics of functional heartburn [J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2014, 26(4): 546-555.
10
Frazzoni M, Savarino E, Bortoli ND, et al. Analyses of the post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index and nocturnal baseline impedance parameters increase the diagnostic yield of patients with reflux disease [J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, 14(1): 40-46.
11
Frazzoni M, Bertani H, Conigliaro R, et al. Neoplastic progression in short-segment Barrett's oesophagus is associated with impairment of chemical clearance, but not inadequate acid suppression by proton pump inhibitor therapy [J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2014, 40(7): 835-842.
12
Frazzoni M, De BN, Frazzoni L, et al. The added diagnostic value of postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index and nocturnal baseline impedance in refractory reflux disease studied with on-therapy impedance-pH monitoring [J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2017. 29(3). doi: 10.1111/nmo.12947. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
13
Kandulski A, Weigt J, Caro C, et al. Esophageal intraluminal baseline impedance differentiates gastroesophageal reflux disease from functional heartburn [J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2015, 13(6): 1075-1081.
14
Kessing BF,Bredenoord AJ, Weijenborg PW, et al. Esophageal acid exposure decreases intraluminal baseline impedance levels [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2011, 106(12): 2093-2097.
15
Zhong C, Duan L, Wang K, et al. Esophageal intraluminal baseline impedance is associated with severity of acid reflux and epithelial structural abnormalities in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. J Gastroenterol, 2013, 48(5): 601-610.
16
Patel A, Wang D, Sainani N, et al. Distal mean nocturnal baseline impedance on pH-impedance monitoring predicts reflux burden and symptomatic outcome in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease [J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2016, 44(8): 890-898.
17
Xie C, Sifrim D, Li Y, et al. Esophageal Baseline Impedance Reflects Mucosal Integrity and Predicts Symptomatic Outcome With Proton Pump Inhibitor Treatment [J]. J Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2018, 24(1): 43-50.
18
Rinsma NF, Farré R, Bouvy ND, et al. The effect of endoscopic fundoplication and proton pump inhibitors on baseline impedance and heartburn severity in GERD patients [J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2015, 27(2): 220-228.
19
Ye BX, Jiang LQ, Lin L, et al. Reflux episodes and esophageal impedance levels in patients with typical and atypical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. Medicine (Abingdon), 2017, 96(37): e7978.
20
Cho YK, Lee JS, Lee TH, et al. The Relationship of the Post-reflux Swallow-induced Peristaltic Wave Index and Esophageal Baseline Impedance with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms [J]. J Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2017, 23(2): 237-244.
21
陈旻湖,侯晓华,肖英莲,等. 2014年中国胃食管反流病专家共识意见[J].胃肠病学,2015, (3): 155-168.
22
中国胃食管反流病共识意见专家组.中国胃食管反流病共识意见(2006·10三亚) [J].中华内科杂志, 2007, 46(2): 170-173.
23
Gao F, Gao Y, Chen X, et al. Comparison of esophageal function tests in chinese patients with functional heartburn and reflux hypersensitivity [J]. Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2017, 2017(6): 3596148.
24
Aziz Q, Fass R, Gyawali CP, et al. Functional esophageal disorders [J]. Gastroenterology, 2016, 130(5): 1459-1465.
25
Yamasaki T, Fass R. Reflux hypersensitivity: A new functional esophageal disorder [J]. J Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2017, 23(4): 495-503.
26
Tack J, Drossman DA. What's new in Rome IV? [J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2017, 29(9). doi: 10.1111/nmo.13053. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
27
Frazzoni L, Frazzoni M, De BN, et al. Critical appraisal of Rome IV criteria: hypersensitive esophagus does belong to gastroesophageal reflux disease spectrum [J]. Ann Gastroenterol, 2018, 31(1): 1-7.
28
Schmulson MJ, Drossman DA. What is new in Rome IV [J]. J Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2017, 23(2): 151-163.
29
Frazzoni M, Conigliaro R, Melotti G. Weakly acidic refluxes have a major role in the pathogenesis of proton pump inhibitor-resistant reflux oesophagitis [J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2011, 33(5): 601-606.
30
Kohata Y, Fujiwara Y, Yamagami H, et al. Usefulness of baseline impedance in patients with proton pump inhibitor-refractory nonerosive reflux disease [J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2015. 30(S1): 36-40.
31
Jiang L, Ye B, Lin L, et al. Role of altered esophageal intraluminal baseline impedance levels in patients with gatroesophageal reflux disease refractory to proton pump inhibitors [J]. Medicine (Abingdon), 2016, 95(33): e4351.
32
Ribolsi M, Savarino E, Bortoli ND, et al. Reflux pattern and role of impedance-pH variables in predicting PPI response in patients with suspected GERD-related chronic cough [J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2014, 40(8): 966-973.
33
Zentilin P, Savarino V, Marabotto E, et al. Esophageal baseline impedance levels allow the identification of esophageal involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis [J]. Semin Arthritis Rheum, 2017, 47(4): 569.
34
Tenca A, Bortoli ND, Mauro A, et al. Esophageal chemical clearance and baseline impedance values in patients with chronic autoimmune atrophic gastritis and gastro-esophageal reflux disease [J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2017, 49(9): 978-983
35
Fukahori S, Yagi M, Ishii S, et al. A baseline impedance analysis in neurologically impaired children: A potent parameter for estimating the condition of the esophageal mucosa [J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2017, 29(6). doi: 10.1111/nmo.13012. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
36
Matsumura T, Arai M, Ishigami H, et al. Evaluation of esophageal mucosal integrity in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. Digestion, 2018, 97(1): 31-37.
[1] 贾卓奇, 周维茹, 张勇, 张广健, 付军科. 达·芬奇机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的对比研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 410-414.
[2] 李亮, 洪楚原, 李明哲, 郝腾飞, Chongkuo Zi. 胃食管结合部抗反流机制探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 6-8.
[3] 杜兴, 罗颖, 高颖, 董庆申, 刘殿刚, 汪忠镐, 郑煜琳. 腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠联合His角重建术治疗胃食管反流病的短期疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 510-515.
[4] 王擎, 王冠峰, 陈星. 胃食管阀瓣的Hill分级在胃食管反流病中的应用价值[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 125-130.
[5] 张继舜, 陈思旭, 钱洁, 尚占民, 郝建宇. 平均夜间基线阻抗对食管外症状胃食管反流病的临床诊断价值[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 97-102.
[6] 文明, 熊英, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 质子泵抑制剂治疗期间焦虑对胃食管反流病疗效的影响[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 90-95.
[7] 范勇, 张利昉, 杨美琳. 改良经口内镜下贲门缩窄术治疗胃食管反流病效果分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 65-68.
[8] 陆洪鹏, 袁芯, 郑树灏, 刘怡, 徐磊. 慢性咳嗽与胃食管反流病:双向两样本孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 59-64.
[9] 李鹏, 刘国祥, 李汝红. 经口内镜下贲门缩窄术治疗胃食管反流病的研究进展[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 96-99.
[10] 买买提·依斯热依力, 尹强, 尹海龙, 董雨微, 王永康, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 阿吉艾克拜尔·艾萨. 传统医药治疗胃食管反流病的研究进展[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 100-104.
[11] 李赞林, 马建惠, 王志. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术对胃食管反流病疗效的系统评价与分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 22-30.
[12] 张高松, 杨美琳, 袁莉, 俞炎波, 石琳妮. 内镜下贲门缩窄术对改善胃食管反流病患者生活质量的观察[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 18-21.
[13] 张晓贝, 王伟刚, 李晓龙, 易风俊, 俞永江. 幽门螺旋杆菌感染与不同亚型胃食管反流病的相关性[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 1-5.
[14] 闫晶, 蒋媛, 买买提·依斯热依力, 王俭, 王永康, 阿巴伯克力·乌斯曼, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 膈肌生物反馈训练对胃食管反流病的效果分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 50-55.
[15] 伍振鹏, 乔钰涵, 向林, 江云颂, 彭居正, 吴丽娜, 程吕佳, 关炳生, 庄子康, 杨景哥. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中胃窦切缘与幽门的距离对术后胃食管反流病及减重效果的影响[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 4-11.
阅读次数
全文


摘要