切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (04) : 185 -189. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2024.04.002

论著

抗反流黏膜消融术治疗反流高敏感患者八例
胡志伟1, 宋庆1, 陈冬1, 吴继敏1,()   
  1. 1. 100088 北京,火箭军特色医学中心胃食管外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-11 出版日期:2024-11-15
  • 通信作者: 吴继敏

Anti-reflux mucosal ablation for the treatment of reflux hypersensitivity: a report of 8 cases

Zhiwei Hu1, Dong Chen1, Qing Song1, Jimin Wu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroesophageal Surgery Department, Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center, Beijing 100088, China
  • Received:2024-09-11 Published:2024-11-15
  • Corresponding author: Jimin Wu
引用本文:

胡志伟, 宋庆, 陈冬, 吴继敏. 抗反流黏膜消融术治疗反流高敏感患者八例[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 185-189.

Zhiwei Hu, Dong Chen, Qing Song, Jimin Wu. Anti-reflux mucosal ablation for the treatment of reflux hypersensitivity: a report of 8 cases[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2024, 11(04): 185-189.

目的

初步探讨抗反流黏膜消融术(ARMA)治疗反流高敏感(RH)的疗效。

方法

回顾分析2022年8月至2023年8月于火箭军特色医学中心胃食管外科接受内镜下ARMA治疗的8例RH患者的疗效,比较治疗前后胃食管反流相关症状的主观缓解程度、抑酸药停药率、术后并发症、复发和再次治疗情况。

结果

本组RH患者男性3例,女性5例,平均年龄53岁。ARMA术后平均随访时间18个月,术后患者的反酸、烧心和胸/背痛症状的主观缓解度分别为72%(38,10)%、70%(50,95)%和70%(25,97)%,且症状评分较术前均有显著下降(P<0.05)。术后抑酸药停药率为87.5%(7/8),疗效满意率为75%(6/8)。术后吞咽疼痛不适2例、腹胀和上腹痛各有1例,均为轻度,均保守治疗1周内缓解,无术后吞咽困难病例。症状部分复发1例,无再次抗反流干预病例。

结论

ARMA可减轻大部分RH患者的GERD症状,有较高的疗效满意率和抑酸药停药率。术后并发症较少且轻微。然而ARMA更准确的安全性和疗效需进一步研究。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of anti-reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) in treating reflux hypersensitivity (RH).

Method

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the efficacy of 8 RH patients who received endoscopic ARMA treatment at Department of Gastroesophageal Surgery Department of Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center from August 2022 to August 2023. The subjective relief of gastroesophageal reflux related symptoms, discontinuation rate of acid suppressant, postoperative complications, recurrence, and re treatment were compared before and after ARMA.

Results

There were 3 males and 5 females in this group of RH patients, with a mean of 53 years. The mean follow-up time after ARMA was 18 months, and the subjective relief rates of acid reflux, heartburn, and chest/back pain symptoms in postoperative patients were 72%(38, 10)%, 70%(50, 95)%, and 70%(25, 97)%, respectively. And the symptom scores were significantly lower than before surgery (all P<0.05). The postoperative discontinuation rate of acid suppressing drug was 87.5% (7/8), and the satisfaction rate of therapeutic effect was 75% (6/8).There were 2 cases of postoperative swallowing pain discomfort, 1 case of abdominal distension, and 1 case of upper abdominal pain, all of which were mild and relieved within 1 week after conservative treatment.There were no cases of postoperative dysphagia. There was 1 case of partial recurrence of symptoms and no cases of anti-reflux reintervention.

Conclusion

ARMA can alleviate the GERD symptoms in most RH patients, with a high satisfaction rate of efficacy and acid suppressing drug discontinuation rate. Postoperative complications are rare and mild. However, further research is needed to determine the more accurate safety and efficacy of ARMA.

图1 胃镜下抗反流黏膜消融术 注:1A~C胃镜检查评估患者胃食管阀瓣形态,APC标记贲门部位黏膜预消融区域;1D~F在标记范围内对齿状线下胃小弯侧胃黏膜进行APC消融(形成马蹄形消融面);1G~I对齿状线上食管黏膜进行消融,纵向长度约2 cm,横向约1/2环周黏膜。APC为氩离子凝固术
表1 术前食管高分辨率测压和pH-阻抗监测结果[MQ1Q3)]
表2 治疗前后症状评分的比较和主观缓解程度 [MQ1Q3)]
1
胡志伟, 吴继敏, 汪忠镐. 中国胃食管反流病多学科诊疗共识2022[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2022, 9(2-3): 51-88, 112-146
2
Savarino V, Marabotto E, Zentilin P, et al. Esophageal reflux hypersensitivity: non-GERD or still GERD?[J]. Dig Liver Dis,2020,52(12):1413-1420.
3
Hernandez Mondragon OV, Zamarripa Mottu RA, Garcia Contreras LF, et al. Clinical feasibility of a new antireflux ablation therapy on gastroesophageal reflux disease (with video)[J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2020,92(6):1190-1201.
4
Rodriguez de Santiago E, Sanchez-Vegazo CT, Penas B, et al.Antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and antireflux mucosal ablation(ARMA) for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Endosc Int Open, 2021,9(11):E1740-E1751.
5
胡志伟, 邓昌荣, 纪涛, 等. 射频治疗顽固性胃食管反流病的疗效分析:429例报告[J/OL]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版). 2020,12(10):89-94.
6
Yeh JH, Lee CT, Hsu MH, et al. Antireflux mucosal intervention(ARMI) procedures for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Therap Adv Gastroenterol,2022,15:17562848221094959.
7
中国医疗保健国际交流促进会胃食管反流病学分会胃食管反流病射频治疗专家协作组. 中国胃食管反流病射频治疗专家建议[J].中华消化杂志, 2024,44(7):453-460.
8
Shimamura Y, Inoue H, Tanabe M, et al. Clinical outcomes of antireflux mucosal ablation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: an international bi-institutional study[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2024,39(1):149-156.
9
鲍云, 乔伟光, 黄思霖. 抗反流黏膜消融术治疗难治性胃食管反流病1例[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2023,28(6):677-678.
10
徐佳昕, 蔡明琰, 刘斌, 等. 氩离子凝固术在消化内镜治疗中的应用[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2017,34(8):602-606.
11
Sumi K, Inoue H, Ando R, et al. Long-term efficacy of antireflux mucosectomy in patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Dig Endosc, 2024, 36(3): 305-313.
12
Li ZT, Ji F, Han XW, et al. Endoscopic cardial constriction with band ligation in the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease:a preliminary feasibility study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(7):4035-4041.
13
Klimczak T, Strzelczyk J. Endoscopic anti-reflux mucosectomy(ARMS) and endoscopic anti-reflux ablation (ARMA) as a potential treatment for gastroesophageal reflux - preliminary report[J]. Pol Przegl Chir, 2023,96(0):1-5.
14
Jiang YX, Dong ZY, Wang JW, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for treatment of reflux hypersensitivity:a study based on romeⅣ criteria[J]. Gastroenterol Res Pract,2022,2022: 4145810.
15
Liu S, Chai N, Zhai Y, et al. New treatment method for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): C-BLART (clip band ligation anti-reflux therapy)-a short-term study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020,34(10): 4516-4524.
16
Zhu X, Shen J. Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Eur J Med Res, 2024,29(1):185.
[1] 邢益民, 张天飞, 戴慧勇. 胃肠充盈超声造影检查在反酸、嗳气患者临床诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 303-306.
[2] 邱雨豪, 黄金向, 朱小轩, 罗峰, 黄河, 姚晖, 汪雪. 多学科诊疗联合加速康复外科模式在食管裂孔疝诊疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-62.
[3] 李海云, 赵敏娴, 申英末, 杨慧琪. 胃底折叠术预防食管裂孔疝术后并发症的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 485-490.
[4] 玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.
[5] 任传富, 杨志, 徐恩, 何梓芸, 罗板鑫, 陈新, 夏雪峰. 腹腔镜疝修补术联合胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病40 例临床分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 507-511.
[6] 胡志伟, 吴继敏, 汪忠镐, 张美光. 胃食管反流病食管外症状抗反流手术适应证及术前评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 241-246.
[7] 胡志伟, 吴继敏, 邓昌荣, 战秀岚, 纪涛, 王峰, 田书瑞, 陈冬, 张玉, 刘健男, 宋庆. 抗反流黏膜套扎治疗顽固性胃食管反流病[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 227-233.
[8] 唐小久, 胡曼, 许必君, 肖亚. 肥胖合并胃食管反流病患者严重程度与其焦虑抑郁及营养状态的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 360-364.
[9] 张静, 白亦冰, 来要良, 刘永, 和媛媛, 苏敏. 不同体位对胃食管反流病患者食管高分辨率测压的影响[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 115-120.
[10] 张靖, 柏君, 陈玉盟, 张鹏, 侯芳芳, 王军芳, 孙静, 赵士博, 杨喆, 张玥, 张瑞芳, 朱宏斌. 抗反流黏膜消融术治疗胃食管反流病患者的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 121-125.
[11] 华丽, 仲卫冬, 胡根, 张丽英, 邵国益. 手术治疗胃食管反流病对患者生活质量和心理状态影响的研究[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 126-129.
[12] 文明, 张丽, 谢芳, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 构建胃食管反流病患者发生心房颤动的临床预测模型[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 130-136.
[13] 高训锋, 许晓露, 张金辉, 蔡理全, 张恒, 邰沁文. 胃食管反流病与肝胆胰系统疾病的因果关系:一项孟德尔随机化研究[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 143-152.
[14] 刘虎, 任振, 韦笑韩, 潘晨, 吴立胜. 胃食管反流伴食管运动障碍的诊疗进展[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 153-158.
[15] 中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和代谢病外科专家工作组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会胃食管反流疾病诊疗外科专家工作组, 日本肥胖治疗学会, 韩国减重与代谢外科学会. 袖状胃切除术患者胃食管反流病诊治专家共识(2024版)[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 145-162.
阅读次数
全文


摘要