切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 87 -89. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2022.02.002

论著

近端食管异位胃黏膜与胃食管反流关系的探讨
郝腾飞1, 石威文1, 李亮1,()   
  1. 1. 518000 深圳,中山大学附属第七医院(深圳)消化医学中心
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-29 出版日期:2022-05-15
  • 通信作者: 李亮

Disscussion of the relation between the proximal esophgeal ectopic gastic mucosa and the gastroesophageal reflux

Tengfei Hao1, Weiwen Shi1, Liang Li1,()   

  1. 1. The Digestive Medicine Center of The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518000, China
  • Received:2021-12-29 Published:2022-05-15
  • Corresponding author: Liang Li
引用本文:

郝腾飞, 石威文, 李亮. 近端食管异位胃黏膜与胃食管反流关系的探讨[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2022, 09(02): 87-89.

Tengfei Hao, Weiwen Shi, Liang Li. Disscussion of the relation between the proximal esophgeal ectopic gastic mucosa and the gastroesophageal reflux[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2022, 09(02): 87-89.

目的

探讨近端食管异位胃粘膜黏膜与胃食管反流关系。

方法

选取2021年7月至2021年12月于中山大学附属第七医院(深圳)收治的成人胃镜检查资料,根据有无近端食管异位胃黏膜分为观察组和对照组,随机选取纳入病例,运用t检验或χ2对年龄、性别、是否具有胃食管反流病或胃食管反流的解剖学基础3个因素进行统计学分析。

结果

观察组和对照组各纳入患者215例,观察组年龄(43.4±10.7)岁,对照组年龄(42.8±11.7)岁,差异无统计学意义(P=0.211);2组之间性别组成差异无统计学意义(P=0.845);观察组49.8%(107/215)存在胃食管反流病或胃食管反流解剖学基础,而对照组39.5%(85/215)存在胃食管反流病或胃食管反流解剖学基础,差异有统计学意义(P=0.042)。

结论

近端食管异位胃黏膜可能为胃食管反流物的作用下化生的结果,近端食管异位胃黏膜提示存近端食管反流的可能。

Methods

Selected the data of adult gastroscopy in our hospital from July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021, the patients were divided into observation group and control group according to the presence or absence of proximal ectopic gastric mucosa, Statistical analysis was conducted according to age, gender, presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and anatomical basis of gastroesophageal reflux, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 215 patients were included in the observation group and the control group, with an average age of (43.4±10.7) years in the observation group and (42.8±11.7) years in the control group, and there was no significant difference in age between the two groups (P=0.211). There was no significant difference in gender composition between the two groups (P=0.845). In the observation group, 49.8% (107/215) had the gastroesophageal reflux disease or the anatomical basis of gastroesophageal, while 39.5% (85/215) of the control group had the gastroesophageal reflux disease or the anatomical basis of gastroesophageal, the difference was statistically significant (P=0.042).

Conclusion

Proximal esophageal ectopic gastric mucosa may be the result of metaplasia under the impact of gastroesophageal reflux, proximal esophageal ectopic gastric mucosa suggests the possibility of proximal esophageal reflux.

Obstract

To study the relationship between ectopic gastric mucosa of proximal esophagus and gastroesophageal reflux.

1
Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG, et al. Diagnosis and management of Barrett's Esophagus: an updated ACG guideline [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2022, 117(4):559-587.
2
吐尔逊阿依·热夏提, 高峰. 食管上段异位胃黏膜临床病理特点及相关危险因素分析[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆医科大学, 2020:1-32.
3
Suzuki T, Seki Y, Matsumura T, et al. Reflux-related extraesophageal symptoms until proven otherwise: a direct measurement of abnormal proximal exposure based on hypopharyngeal multichannel intraluminal impedance as a reliable indicator for successful treatment outcomes [J]. J Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2022, 28(1):69-77.
4
Ciocalteu A, Popa P, Ionescu M, et al. Issues and controversies in esophageal inlet patch [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2019, 25(30):4061-4073.
5
Kuribayashi S, Hosaka H, Nakamura F, et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. DEN open, 2021, 2(1):e86.
6
Guo Z, Wu Y, Zhan Y, et al. Correlation between gastroesophageal flap valve abnormality and novel parameters in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms by the lyon consensus [J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1):15076.
7
Osman A, Albashir MM, Nandipati K, et al. Esophagogastric junction morphology on hill's classification predicts gastroesophageal reflux with good accuracy and consistency[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2021, 66(1):151-159.
8
Kim JY, Shin IS, Min YW, et al. Endoscopic prediction for acid reflux in patients without hiatus hernia [J]. Korean J Gastroenterol, 2020, 76(3):134-141.
9
Wu W, Li L, Qu C, et al. Reflux finding score is associated with gastroesophageal flap valve status in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a retrospective study [J]. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1):15744.
10
Kitasaki N, Hamai Y, Yoshikawa T, et al. Recurrent esophageal adenocarcinoma derived from ectopic gastric mucosa: a case report [J]. Thorac Cancer, 2022, 13(6):876-879.
[1] 邢益民, 张天飞, 戴慧勇. 胃肠充盈超声造影检查在反酸、嗳气患者临床诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 303-306.
[2] 李海云, 赵敏娴, 申英末, 杨慧琪. 胃底折叠术预防食管裂孔疝术后并发症的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 485-490.
[3] 玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.
[4] 任传富, 杨志, 徐恩, 何梓芸, 罗板鑫, 陈新, 夏雪峰. 腹腔镜疝修补术联合胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病40 例临床分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 507-511.
[5] 胡志伟, 吴继敏, 汪忠镐, 张美光. 胃食管反流病食管外症状抗反流手术适应证及术前评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 241-246.
[6] 胡志伟, 吴继敏, 邓昌荣, 战秀岚, 纪涛, 王峰, 田书瑞, 陈冬, 张玉, 刘健男, 宋庆. 抗反流黏膜套扎治疗顽固性胃食管反流病[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 227-233.
[7] 唐小久, 胡曼, 许必君, 肖亚. 肥胖合并胃食管反流病患者严重程度与其焦虑抑郁及营养状态的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 360-364.
[8] 文明, 张丽, 谢芳, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 构建胃食管反流病患者发生心房颤动的临床预测模型[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 130-136.
[9] 华丽, 仲卫冬, 胡根, 张丽英, 邵国益. 手术治疗胃食管反流病对患者生活质量和心理状态影响的研究[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 126-129.
[10] 张靖, 柏君, 陈玉盟, 张鹏, 侯芳芳, 王军芳, 孙静, 赵士博, 杨喆, 张玥, 张瑞芳, 朱宏斌. 抗反流黏膜消融术治疗胃食管反流病患者的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 121-125.
[11] 张静, 白亦冰, 来要良, 刘永, 和媛媛, 苏敏. 不同体位对胃食管反流病患者食管高分辨率测压的影响[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 115-120.
[12] 高训锋, 许晓露, 张金辉, 蔡理全, 张恒, 邰沁文. 胃食管反流病与肝胆胰系统疾病的因果关系:一项孟德尔随机化研究[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 143-152.
[13] 刘虎, 任振, 韦笑韩, 潘晨, 吴立胜. 胃食管反流伴食管运动障碍的诊疗进展[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 153-158.
[14] 庄茜钧, 江典轩, 肖英莲. 中国胃食管反流病的诊疗进展[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 75-80.
[15] 中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和代谢病外科专家工作组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会胃食管反流疾病诊疗外科专家工作组, 日本肥胖治疗学会, 韩国减重与代谢外科学会. 袖状胃切除术患者胃食管反流病诊治专家共识(2024版)[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 145-162.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?