切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华胃食管反流病电子杂志

中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 87 -89. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2022.02.002

论著

近端食管异位胃黏膜与胃食管反流关系的探讨
郝腾飞1, 石威文1, 李亮1,†()   
  1. 1. 518000　深圳，中山大学附属第七医院（深圳）消化医学中心
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-29 出版日期:2022-05-15
  • 通信作者: 李亮

Disscussion of the relation between the proximal esophgeal ectopic gastic mucosa and the gastroesophageal reflux

Tengfei Hao1, Weiwen Shi1, Liang Li1,†()   

  1. 1. The Digestive Medicine Center of The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518000, China
  • Received:2021-12-29 Published:2022-05-15
  • Corresponding author: Liang Li
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

郝腾飞, 石威文, 李亮. 近端食管异位胃黏膜与胃食管反流关系的探讨[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2022, 09(02): 87-89.

Tengfei Hao, Weiwen Shi, Liang Li. Disscussion of the relation between the proximal esophgeal ectopic gastic mucosa and the gastroesophageal reflux[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition), 2022, 09(02): 87-89.

目的

探讨近端食管异位胃粘膜黏膜与胃食管反流关系。

方法

选取2021年7月至2021年12月于中山大学附属第七医院（深圳）收治的成人胃镜检查资料，根据有无近端食管异位胃黏膜分为观察组和对照组，随机选取纳入病例，运用t检验或χ2对年龄、性别、是否具有胃食管反流病或胃食管反流的解剖学基础3个因素进行统计学分析。

结果

观察组和对照组各纳入患者215例，观察组年龄（43.4±10.7）岁，对照组年龄（42.8±11.7）岁，差异无统计学意义（P=0.211）；2组之间性别组成差异无统计学意义（P=0.845）；观察组49.8%（107/215）存在胃食管反流病或胃食管反流解剖学基础，而对照组39.5%（85/215）存在胃食管反流病或胃食管反流解剖学基础，差异有统计学意义（P=0.042）。

结论

近端食管异位胃黏膜可能为胃食管反流物的作用下化生的结果，近端食管异位胃黏膜提示存近端食管反流的可能。

关键词: 近端食管异位胃黏膜, 胃食管反流病, 胃食管结合部阀瓣, 反流性食管炎, 巴雷特食管
Methods

Selected the data of adult gastroscopy in our hospital from July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021, the patients were divided into observation group and control group according to the presence or absence of proximal ectopic gastric mucosa, Statistical analysis was conducted according to age, gender, presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and anatomical basis of gastroesophageal reflux, and P＜0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 215 patients were included in the observation group and the control group, with an average age of (43.4±10.7) years in the observation group and (42.8±11.7) years in the control group, and there was no significant difference in age between the two groups (P=0.211). There was no significant difference in gender composition between the two groups (P=0.845). In the observation group, 49.8% (107/215) had the gastroesophageal reflux disease or the anatomical basis of gastroesophageal, while 39.5% (85/215) of the control group had the gastroesophageal reflux disease or the anatomical basis of gastroesophageal, the difference was statistically significant (P=0.042).

Conclusion

Proximal esophageal ectopic gastric mucosa may be the result of metaplasia under the impact of gastroesophageal reflux, proximal esophageal ectopic gastric mucosa suggests the possibility of proximal esophageal reflux.

Obstract

To study the relationship between ectopic gastric mucosa of proximal esophagus and gastroesophageal reflux.

Key words: Proximal esophageal ectopic gastric mucosa, Gastroesophageal reflux disease, Gastroesophageal flap valve, Reflux esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus
1
Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG, et al. Diagnosis and management of Barrett's Esophagus: an updated ACG guideline [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2022, 117(4):559-587.
2
吐尔逊阿依·热夏提, 高峰. 食管上段异位胃黏膜临床病理特点及相关危险因素分析[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆医科大学, 2020:1-32.
3
Suzuki T, Seki Y, Matsumura T, et al. Reflux-related extraesophageal symptoms until proven otherwise: a direct measurement of abnormal proximal exposure based on hypopharyngeal multichannel intraluminal impedance as a reliable indicator for successful treatment outcomes [J]. J Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2022, 28(1):69-77.
4
Ciocalteu A, Popa P, Ionescu M, et al. Issues and controversies in esophageal inlet patch [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2019, 25(30):4061-4073.
5
Kuribayashi S, Hosaka H, Nakamura F, et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. DEN open, 2021, 2(1):e86.
6
Guo Z, Wu Y, Zhan Y, et al. Correlation between gastroesophageal flap valve abnormality and novel parameters in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms by the lyon consensus [J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1):15076.
7
Osman A, Albashir MM, Nandipati K, et al. Esophagogastric junction morphology on hill's classification predicts gastroesophageal reflux with good accuracy and consistency[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2021, 66(1):151-159.
8
Kim JY, Shin IS, Min YW, et al. Endoscopic prediction for acid reflux in patients without hiatus hernia [J]. Korean J Gastroenterol, 2020, 76(3):134-141.
9
Wu W, Li L, Qu C, et al. Reflux finding score is associated with gastroesophageal flap valve status in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a retrospective study [J]. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1):15744.
10
Kitasaki N, Hamai Y, Yoshikawa T, et al. Recurrent esophageal adenocarcinoma derived from ectopic gastric mucosa: a case report [J]. Thorac Cancer, 2022, 13(6):876-879.
[1] 贾卓奇, 周维茹, 张勇, 张广健, 付军科. 达·芬奇机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的对比研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 410-414.
[2] 李亮, 洪楚原, 李明哲, 郝腾飞, Chongkuo Zi. 胃食管结合部抗反流机制探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 6-8.
[3] 王擎, 王冠峰, 陈星. 胃食管阀瓣的Hill分级在胃食管反流病中的应用价值[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 125-130.
[4] 张继舜, 陈思旭, 钱洁, 尚占民, 郝建宇. 平均夜间基线阻抗对食管外症状胃食管反流病的临床诊断价值[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 97-102.
[5] 陆洪鹏, 袁芯, 郑树灏, 刘怡, 徐磊. 慢性咳嗽与胃食管反流病：双向两样本孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 59-64.
[6] 范勇, 张利昉, 杨美琳. 改良经口内镜下贲门缩窄术治疗胃食管反流病效果分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 65-68.
[7] 文明, 熊英, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 质子泵抑制剂治疗期间焦虑对胃食管反流病疗效的影响[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 90-95.
[8] 李鹏, 刘国祥, 李汝红. 经口内镜下贲门缩窄术治疗胃食管反流病的研究进展[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 96-99.
[9] 买买提·依斯热依力, 尹强, 尹海龙, 董雨微, 王永康, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 阿吉艾克拜尔·艾萨. 传统医药治疗胃食管反流病的研究进展[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 100-104.
[10] 闫晶, 蒋媛, 买买提·依斯热依力, 王俭, 王永康, 阿巴伯克力·乌斯曼, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 膈肌生物反馈训练对胃食管反流病的效果分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 50-55.
[11] 张高松, 杨美琳, 袁莉, 俞炎波, 石琳妮. 内镜下贲门缩窄术对改善胃食管反流病患者生活质量的观察[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 18-21.
[12] 王雯, 王志, 胡传国. 连朴饮加减与艾司奥美拉唑及莫沙必利联合治疗对反流性食管炎患者神经递质及血清CGRP、IL-1β、IL-17的影响[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 6-10.
[13] 张晓贝, 王伟刚, 李晓龙, 易风俊, 俞永江. 幽门螺旋杆菌感染与不同亚型胃食管反流病的相关性[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 1-5.
[14] 李赞林, 马建惠, 王志. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术对胃食管反流病疗效的系统评价与分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 22-30.
[15] 伍振鹏, 乔钰涵, 向林, 江云颂, 彭居正, 吴丽娜, 程吕佳, 关炳生, 庄子康, 杨景哥. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中胃窦切缘与幽门的距离对术后胃食管反流病及减重效果的影响[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 4-11.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号